From The New England Journal of Medicine
Jonathan Edlow's book, Bull's-Eye: Unraveling the Medical Mystery of Lyme Disease, was published at a particularly fitting time. This year marks the 20th anniversary of the discovery by Burgdorfer, Benach, and Barbour of the causative agent of Lyme disease, a spirochete we now know as Borrelia burgdorferi. That discovery pulled together many of the diverse scientific and historic aspects of Lyme disease and set the stage for further research into this spirochete and the diseases it causes. Edlow's book allows the reader to develop a better understanding of this complex illness. However, his book is not just about Lyme disease, and it is not a medical textbook; rather, it is the story of an emerging infection and its history. To quote the author, "This is a tale about scientific inquiry, as it exists in a cultural context." The title is somewhat misleading, however, because the book, which is beautifully written, is not just about the discovery of Lyme disease, its cause, and the controversies surrounding it. The book is also an exploration of how medical mysteries are solved and of how many observations and discoveries are connected and finally pieced together to yield solutions. The book is written in a clear, readable style that should appeal to both medical professionals and members of the general public. It offers insights into the way medical science actually works. Edlow discusses not only the parts played by Burgdorfer, Steere, Benach, Malawista, and others in the story of Lyme disease, but also the critical parts played by lesser-known persons. The story of Lyme disease would be very different without the work of European physicians in the 19th and early 20th centuries; two mothers from Lyme, Connecticut, Polly Murray and Judith Mensch; two Navy physicians, William Mast and William Burrows; and an officer from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, David Snydman, who worked with the Connecticut Department of Public Health. (See Figure.) It is important to mention that, especially in regard to its depiction of highly specialized physicians, this book is a cautionary tale. In chapter 9, "The Blind Men and the Elephant," the author contrasts the views of the Navy physicians, Mast and Burrows, with those of the Yale Rheumatology Group. The two Navy doctors were right: Lyme disease is a systemic infectious disease that responds to treatment with antibiotics, not a new form of arthritis that does not respond to antibiotics. Ultimately, the book clearly points out that modern medical discoveries are not the work of one person. Science and medicine are the work of many people, a series of small discoveries and observations and of connections that lead to new insights. Edlow details how patients, their family members, and scientists and physicians contributed to the knowledge of the illness we now call Lyme disease. The author also delves into the controversy surrounding Lyme disease. He describes the contrasting views and the failure of academic physicians to be open-minded. I believe that the one flaw in this book is that it does not clearly delineate the risks unconventional approaches pose to patients. Be that as it may, anyone who is curious about Lyme disease or medical discovery in general will find this book interesting reading.
Raymond Dattwyler, M.D.Copyright © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS.
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
From Booklist
Mark Twain wrote that the difference between fact and fiction is that fiction has to make sense. Edlow, an author of medical detective stories and a Harvard professor of medicine, indulges the luxury facts allow while chronicling the evolution of Lyme disease, and with its blind alleys and plot twists, the story of this puzzling illness validates Twain's statement. Almost nothing about Lyme disease makes sense. From its "discovery" in a rural New England town in the mid-1970s--after it was believed that modern antibiotics had all but eradicated infectious disease--to the ongoing debate over its duration, prevention, treatment, and even diagnosis, it has remained a topic of considerable controversy. As the title, which refers to the concentric, red-ringed lesion resulting from the bite of an infected tick, suggests, this well-documented book is about a newly targeted infectious disease, and it is as important for the light it sheds on the nature of scientific inquiry within the contemporary social and political context as it is for its information about Lyme disease.
Donna ChavezCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
See all Editorial Reviews
by Polly Murray
by Karen P. Yerges
