Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not worth your money..., August 28, 2006
Reading the summary on the back of the book, one would think that the author was going to present the case AGAINST Darlie....instead, it seems as though the author got a little too friendly with Darlie's family.
The acknowledgements page in the beginning of the book is pretty much a good indicator of what is to come: the author thanks Darlie's family for letting him into their 'inner circle' and even calls Darlie's mother by her nickname. That pretty much put up the red light for me....and I was correct in my trepidation. Throughout the book the author continuously points out the mistakes the detectives make and how poor Darlie puts on a brave face. The author even comments on how the evil prison guards made poor, innocent Darlie clean her own jail cell. Hello! It's called prison! They don't hire Rent-A-Maid for the inmates!
And then during the trial the author makes sure to mention practically every word that the defense says and details all the 'points' that the defense 'scores' yet doesn't even take the time to write about what the prosecution says! It's like the author completely tuned out everything the prosecution said!
Oh! And the whole thing about the husband wanting to hire some guy to burglarize the house? Complete bull...The husband went on and on about how he'd give up everything to prove his wife's innocence yet how ironic is it that he decides to 'confess' this bit of information AFTER Darlie's case goes downhill.
This is not a good book to read if you want to know what REALLY happened in the Routier case. I would not reccomend this book. Of course, I'm all for an author presenting BOTH sides of the story...but this book is completely one-sided. In fact, I was so disgusted that I couldn't even finish it. A waste of money.
And as for Darlie's guilt....as disturbing a thought as it is, the evidence (even when presented in such a biased fashion by the author) punches so many holes in Darlie's story that a 'stranger' attack is inconceivable.
|
|
|
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
AUTHOR HAS NO VIABLE CONCLUSION; ERGO, THE BOOK, August 15, 2004
doesn't ring true. Too wishy-washy. In my opinion, she is guilty as hell. What no one ever mentions is, she could hear the baby two floors up, yet, a mysterious intruder enters and stabs/slashes her two boys to death and she doesn't hear a thing until it''s too late? HUH? Do you have any idea how loud two little boys would scream when they were being stabbed? Also, I think the police should take a closer look at hubby...he not only did nothing, apparently he slept through it all, then defends his wife...yet, he was "going to hire an intruder" to steal so he could get insurance money???? Ah, don't think so...he is, even now, remarkably devoid of emotion. He is either a complete anencephalic or complicit in the crime. Darlie deserves the death penalty and every bit of pain and discomfort she gets; as does her husband. One thing no one mentions is, MOTIVE. The motive, obviously, is GREED. They simply decided the two boys were too expensive to keep...so they get rid of them, permanently. What "intruder" enters a house, stabs two little boys to death,. TAKES NOTHING, leaves the mother ALIVE and runs away...it flies in the face of common sense and credibility...and again, WHAT IS THE MOTIVE? There has never been a murder committed without one.
|
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the Most Interesting----, February 27, 2000
true crime books I have ever read. I was riveted and could not put the book down. This book is one of the only true crime books I have ever read where I came away wondering if the person accused, tried and sentenced to death really committed these horrific crimes. The cover basically says she did it but when you read the book you realize this is not an open and shut case. I hope Darlie gets another trial. There were so many things to question in this trial; the secret taping of the so called party at the burial site, the bungling of the investigation of some of the police investigators, their failure to take notes; it is interesting to compare this situation to the Ramsey's whree the Ramsey's didn't cooperate with the investigation and got "lawyered up" immediately. While I don't agree with that, look what happens when you try and cooperate. It is possible she did it but this trial didn't prove it to me and I don't know how she wound up getting the death penalty except for the fact that she took the witness stand and the jurors hated her and punished her. Let's hope justice prevails in this case one way or the other in another trial for at this point I would have to say I feel she may be innocent- only Darlie knows for sure
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|