Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One man's view of the future, December 27, 1999
Written in the late 50's /early 60's,FrederickPohl's short novel foretells the universal use of the "Joybringer" - a portable object which serves as telephone, credit card and entertainment device in a highly automated world. To own this device is to be a part of day-to-day life in the Age of the Pussyfoot. But if you are without one, you are disenfranchised.Anyone who recognises the similarity between this vision of the future and the consolidation of digital technology into the ever more powerful mobile phone is well advised to ask for this disturbing book,written 40 years ago,to be brought back into print
|
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Full circle, December 17, 2003
I last read Age of the Pussyfoot in Bipohl in 1985, so I didn't "get" it. While cleaning out the attic, found it again and read it. Flash forward to 2003: PDA's, pagers, cell phones, the Internet, DVD players and home theater, Designer Drugs, and senseless violence on the streets. I now "get" it, especially how a society that can, in theory, live forever may find unusual ways to vent off, like taking out a license for murder! What I still don't "get" is how Frederik Pohl could have imagined such a future in the early 60's, when this wasn't even in Science Fiction. Reading it again in 2003 gave me a creepy feeling and a new respect for Pohl
|
|
|
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Weird view of the future, September 23, 2003
The basic plot is that a man dies, is frozen for 500 years and is eventually revived to find... Contrary to the previous review, the joymaker (not joybringer) is an incidental part of the story, just a gadget that lets you communicate with the master computer (among other things). The real story is about the effect on society of a combination of affluence and "death reversal" technology (making them bold in some ways and wimps in other ways). It kept my attention, but was really odd.One unusual part of the book is that it includes an afterward by the author to convince us of the soundness of his proposed future (the book was written in 1968). He justifies all kinds of details, including aliens, but leaves out any mention of what to me was the most ill-conceived part of the book, the future attitude towards murder.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
