|
|
134 of 137 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
In a world of crash diets, a plan that works for life., October 15, 2003
This review is from: The New Sugar Busters (Hardcover)
I happened upon the original incarnation of this title in mid 1998, when looking for a healthful alternative to the fast-food lifestyle I'd been living in my early-mid 20s. At 6'2" and 190 pounds, I was not searching to lose weight. Rather I was concerned about what toll eating on-the-run had taken on my body. I had tried the typically recommended low-fat way of eating for several years while in college and knew it did not work for me; I'd had several odd health problems related to the sheer lack of fat in my diet. After reading a quick and (rare) dispassionate review of SugarBusters! (SB), I decided to give it a go.Almost instantly, I noticed I had more energy and stamina, which was important, working and being in school both full-time. Add to this I was eating more - and more frequently - than I had been, possibly ever. The range of what I was eating was diverse and delicious. What I was not prepared for was the weight loss. In less than 3 months, I had dropped 27 pounds and several inches off my waist, settling at 163 pounds and a 33" waistline. And though I weighed a full 20 pounds more than I did when running cross-country in high school, I had a far lower bodyfat percentage. Simply eating correctly (for me, I will admit) allowed me to possess the best health and physique of my life. I stayed with the SB way for several years, but eventually allowed the saboteurs (bagels, white rice, pasta, sugars, potatoes, and other of what i call "crappy carbs") to gain entry again into my life. I suffered the consequences, adding pounds over the years. So why did I stop eating the SB way? Stupidity, in a nutshell. In the interim, I'd tried variations on Atkins, seeking to eliminate most carbohydrate from my diet, regardless of the quality of that carbohydrate. I'd lose and I'd gain. For me, it was simply too difficult to restrict carbohydrate simply on the total level of consumption, treating all carbs the same. Then I remembered SB - and that a central tenet of the SB way is that "not all carbohydrate is created equal." There truly are "bad" carbs - those which cause wild spikes in serum insulin levels - and these must be avoided. However, better choices in carbohydrate consumption CAN be made... and should be for long-term success. This was the piece of the puzzle I was missing. The book itself reads quite easily and is a subtle improvement on the original. The central message, the truth, itself is not very complex, which is I believe why some are disappointed with the level of sophistication of the book. If you're looking for the same relative message, with more scientific analysis, you might enjoy "Protein Power" or possibly "The Zone", although I believe the latter is rigid, unnecessarily so. One of the greatest strengths of the SB way is its flexibility. And if any way of eating is going to succeed in our world today, it's going to have to be flexible. Oh - where am I today? I've dropped about 10 pounds in a month and am on my way back down... for good.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|