Beauty of Fractals: Images of Complex Dynamical Systems (Hardcover)

~ (Author)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"..a rare and extraordinary book...anyone who has ever explored the intricate folds of the Mandelbrot set will want this book and will be delighted by it...above all, a celebration of fractal forms and as such it works superbly...buy this book and enjoy it" Personal Computer World"A literally wonder-ful book!" Physikalische Blätter --This text refers to an alternate Hardcover edition.

Product Description

The authors present an unusual attempt to publicize the field of Complex Dynamics, an exciting mathematical discipline of respectable tradition that recently sprang into new life under the impact of modern computer graphics. Where previous generations of scientists had to develop their own inner eye to perceive the abstract aesthetics of their work, the astonding pictures assembled here invite the reader to share in a new mathematical experience, to revel in the charm of fractal frontiers. 184 illustrations in 211 parts, 88 in color.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 211 pages
• Publisher: Springer; 1 edition (August 1986)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0387158510
• ISBN-13: 978-0387158518
• Product Dimensions: 11.1 x 8.6 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2.4 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #107,056 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #2 in	Books > Computers & Internet > Programming > Algorithms > Fractals
  #40 in	Books > Science > Mathematics > Logic
  #40 in	Books > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Mathematics > Pure Mathematics > Logic

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars The Essence of Beauty, May 21, 2002

By	J.C. Hall "j2o" (Burnaby, B. C. Canada) - See all my reviews

I spent all last evening reading snippets of The Beauty of Fractals (those few paragraphs that a layman could understand) and admiring the sheer beauty of the diagrams/maps. I had not realised there was an aesthetic component to mathematics, and I certainly did not know that aspects of what is generally thought of as a dry science can be so visually appealing, not to say stunning.

I cannot understand why some people would argue the intrinsic artistic merit of something computer-generated and 'unnatural', when the results speak for themselves.

Beauty, true, is perceived, and lies in the eye of the beholder. It can be very subjective. But there are certain aspects of visual appeal that go beyond that. One would think that a symmetry of form, the complementary use of colours, the balance of shape and form, light and shade, arcs and curves--all these combine to give an objective, irrefutable fact of beauty that transcends thought and emotions, if not the senses.

In a couple of the chapters, it was said, and here I paraphrase:

The two modes of analysis and intuition as human means of understanding the natual world--need they be considered at opposite poles? Do they not complement one another? Are the thinker and the dreamer not one?

I find that very intriguing, just as I find the idea of chaos and order existing together in natural, dynamic processes being actually TYPICAL of Nature.

The word 'Chaos' has such negative connotations, implying confusion and destruction, but if I were to replace it with the word 'Disorder', then things begin to fall into place.

There can be no Order if there were no Disorder, for how then would we know the difference? In fact, one of the writers go so far as to say that it is the very existence of Disorder within Order that confers the essence of beauty found in Nature.
That is so true. It is the very non-linear aspect of Nature, that which mathematics, up till Mandelbrot, have been unable to map, that is so appealing in the visual sense.

In Nature, which, apart from abhorring vacuums, also has no place for a straight line (oh, how the poor, innocent straight line is maligned in the preface), beauty is inarguable, irrefutable, and only after that does it have history and context, different to and for each beholder.

So both Chaos/Disorder and Order co-exist in Nature, hand in hand. Order alone, rigidly disciplined, artificially-imposed, seems to require Disorder to breathe life into it.

Taking this a step further, our perception of beauty in all things is affected by Nature.

In yet another chapter, someone quoted someone else and here I go
paraphrasing again.

Beauty in science is the same as beauty in other disciplines-art, music,literature, what have you. 'A fog of events, and suddenly you see a connection. It expresses a complex of human concerns that goes deeply to you, that connects things that were always in you that were never put together before.'

The thinker and the dreamer co-exist within each person, just as the analytical and intuitive modes of thought co-exist, not at opposite poles,but complementing one another.

Intuition and analysis complement, rather than confound (or they should, gods-willing).

The artist and the scientist complement each other, i.e. Art and Science are not the opposing polarites of disciplines as some would have us think.

The thinker and the dreamer ARE one.

And this book has shown that the essence of beauty lies in the marriage of Art and Science.

(Disclaimer: Mere thoughts from a layman.)

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Swirly, March 14, 2001

By	Mr. A. Pomeroy (Wiltshire, England) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Although one of the earliest titles to bring fractals into the mainstream, 'The Beauty of Fractals' isn't as visually exciting as the follow-up, 'Chaos and Fractals', and it's a very dry read - in 1986 complex dynamics were an esoteric field of mathematics that had yet to transfer to student posters and rave videos. At this price it's restricted to people who absolutely need it, although along with 'Godel, Escher, Bach' it's one of the seminal hackish coffee-table books.

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Time goes by... the pictures fade, July 29, 2001

By	R. Bagula "Roger L. Bagula" (Lakeside, Ca United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Amazon dot com gives no credit for my earlier reviews.... I wrote the first review without thinking or spell checking, fast. There are still parts of this book I can't duplicate! And parts that are just written so bad no one can understand them, but most of it stands the test of time, like Mandelbrot's article. This will probably be a classic in the future! I think the free Fractint documentation is probably better for a beginner or Hans Lauwerier's " Fractals".