|
|
48 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
I think we need a new book on this subject., July 2, 1999
By A Customer
This much quoted (and somewhat overrated) book aims at a thorough exposition of the Viennese Classical era, mainly for the lay fan. The goal is obviously laudable, and there are no other similar volumes around, which perhaps partially explains the book's fame. (Rosen's framework does owe a major debt to Tovey's writing, now hard to find.) The book discusses the elements of classical forms and their partial history, and the prevailing cultural climate, but downplays the influence of other composers, and oversimplifies in its distillation of the essence of the style. Due to the ambitious breadth of material, the book's contents - with a few notable exceptions - remain shallow, at least in the view of someone fairly familiar with both the music and the basic theory as presented in this book. Rosen does sprinkle perceptive remarks throughout, but also too often engages in the typical ramblings of a fan (okay, of an exceptionally well educated fan): Rosen makes pronouncements rather than substantiates his points. Many are pretty much unsubtantiable or bafflingly meaningless anyway - e.g. "Mozart's music is the most sinful music ever composed." (An objective quantitative measure for tuneful sinfulness will hopefully never become anyone's thesis topic.) Since Rosen hardly ever offers serious evidence for his rather sweeping generalizations, a newcomer to the music may not be able to distinguish between more universally accepted assessments and those strongly based on the author's individual taste. (Hint: all the many superlatives in the book are in the latter category!) In addition, there are some dubious technical points, and Rosen engages in a certain amount of standard mythologizing about the composers. So actually, on closer inspection, there's a surprising amount of sloppy thinking in this book. The basic point of view is that of a unifying classicist's. Rosen ends up more or less equating classical style with 'music with a certain dramatic logic', a huge generalization. Rosen sounds perhaps superficially quite impressive, for instance in discussing the tension created by structural key changes in sonata form. But the book never progresses beyond these basics, readily obtainable from any decent course on the subject. So the reader is left with only a vague understanding of the real techniques used by these composers to produce their effects - whether dramatic in aim or not. (A plain tonic-dominant change in itself doesn't make for a particularly interesting composition.) Rosen also dismisses music not convenient for his definitions, thus somewhat shortchanging Haydn and Beethoven, compulsive innovators both. For example, Beethoven's early period, which contains a wide variety of original, characteristic, often humorous works, and includes some true masterpieces, is ignored as "classicizing" or purely imitative - a strangely tin-eared (and hackneyed) viewpoint. To me by far the finest sections are the relatively few pages devoted to extended analyses, notably late Beethoven piano sonatas. Here, Rosen avoids generalizations and gets deeper into the music, and these analyses can be quite valuable. (For example, Rosen discusses the true culmination point of the first movement of Op. 106, noticeably missed even by some great pianists.) This book can be read as an introduction to an era, though the limitations of its presentation make it an iffy choice for those who want a more complete picture. (I would also supplement the initial basic concepts sections.) A better version of this book, with fewer vague statements and opinions, and a steadier concentration on truly explaining the music, would be a great achievement.
|