The Increment: A Novel (Hardcover)

~ (Author)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Bestseller Ignatius (Body of Lies) explores America's escalating cold war with Iran in a thriller sure to draw comparisons to le Carré's The Spy Who Came In from the Cold. When Harry Pappas, the new CIA chief of the Iran Operations Division, receives an unsolicited e-mail from an alleged Tehran scientist who calls himself Dr. Ali that implies Iran has in fact continued with its nuclear weapons program and is an imminent threat to global peace, he shares the information with his superiors only to find an administration bent on warmongering. Having vowed never again to play a role in a senseless conflict that could potentially kill thousands of innocents, Pappas, whose only son was killed while serving in the second Iraq War, must somehow identify Dr. Ali, get him out of Iran and mine his knowledge before the U.S. blunders into another unnecessary war. While the realistic story lines build to a somewhat predictable ending, this remains a page-turner of the highest order. (May)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From The Washington Post

From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by Art Taylor Like undercover agents suddenly discovering rival operatives on the same mission, two new spy thrillers seem to have stumbled into each other's path in recent weeks. Both "Banquo's Ghosts" and "The Increment" propose that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program and focus attention on a scientist at the heart of the research. Both novels involve a rogue CIA operation that departs from agency protocol. And both books boast a noted journalist at the helm: Rich Lowry is editor of the National Review (his co-author here is a literary agent), and David Ignatius is a columnist for The Washington Post. Yet despite all these similarities, the two novels couldn't be more different in their attitudes and approaches. The title character of "Banquo's Ghosts" is an old-school spook, operating just off the CIA's radar -- a sort of desk-jockey Jack Bauer tasked to "execute unspoken decisions and deniable intentions." He and his team protect the United States not just from its enemies but from its own weakened bureaucracy and its sorry dependence on frail U.N. resolutions. As far back as a stint in 1980s Beirut, Banquo saw how politics compromised security, and he doesn't intend to let it happen again with this new threat from the Middle East. His latest recruit is Peter Johnson, a bourbon-sotted, left-leaning journalist who's been relentlessly hard on American policies. Johnson is trusted by the Iranians, making him the only one who might get close enough to prove the WMDs are real and then to assassinate the chief architect of the atomic program. All Banquo needs to do is set Johnson on the right path. In "The Increment," on the other hand, it's not the United States that takes the initiative but the Iranian scientist himself. Dr. Ali contacts the CIA through encrypted channels and posts secret information about weapons-grade uranium enrichment. Harry Pappas, chief of the Agency's Iran Operations Division, assembles a team to determine the validity of the information and perhaps recruit Dr. Ali as an agent for the home cause. But as Pappas considers how best to capitalize on this unexpected resource, a trigger-happy U.S. government rushes toward military action. "Bomb, bomb, bomb. Let's bomb Iran," mimics Pappas, who lost his son in Iraq, a student who quit college after Sept. 11 to join the war effort. Pappas can't forgive himself for failing to tell his son that any connection between Sept. 11 and Saddam Hussein was bogus. Even in synopses, the novels' opposing political leanings are apparent, and "Banquo's Ghosts" in particular wears its party affiliation on its sleeve. Lowry and Korman make an example of the journalist sent to Iran, using his disenchantment with misguided liberalism as a life lesson about morality and patriotism and being a real man. As the plot ratchets to a frenzy, "Banquo's Ghost" lampoons the left-wing media and decries a society more interested in hosting "sexual harassment and racial sensitivity seminars" than in eradicating the real evils of the world. Who is that real enemy? The phrase "Muslim Diabolical Genius: Islamo-Nazi-Girl" is used at one point. And what should we do about her? By the time waterboarding rears its ugly, gasping-for-breath head, the book has long since assured us that the ends justify "any means necessary," openly challenging readers to consider the consequences of hesitation, inaction and even diplomacy. Banquo orders torture without flinching, but he's left shaken by the suggestion that the United States might simply talk to Iran: " 'Dialogue . . . ' Banquo whispered, aghast but totally controlled. He wanted to yell now. He'd heard that word before. Always before something terrible happened." In "The Increment," by contrast, we're given lots of conversation, much of it potentially plodding for readers who signed up for cloak-and-dagger and instead got pulled into closed-door policy meetings. E-mails between the CIA and Dr. Ali seek to build relationships and cement understanding. Pappas's internal dialogue reflects on the similarities between his personal loss and Iran's own historic sense of suffering. Dr. Ali ruminates on his father's bitterness toward the shah and his own disillusionment with the Revolution. We're halfway through the novel before the covert ops group known as the Increment is even called to duty. So which is more successful? Hard-hitting action or discreet diplomacy? Readers looking for sheer suspense will be better served by picking up "Banquo's Ghosts." But for others, myself included, a novel's merit might well be judged less by the swiftness of its plot than by the breadth and generosity of its perspective. While "Banquo's Ghosts" subordinates character to thesis and frequently demonizes those Iranian baddies, "The Increment" seeks to paint a full portrait of its young scientist -- charting his hopes and fears, plumbing the motivations behind his shifting allegiances and dangerous betrayals. Where "Banquo's Ghosts" races toward panic in the streets, a more richly emotional climax takes place in "The Increment." It may lack fireworks, but it bears the hard weight of both political and personal history and recognizes the seriousness of what might come next.
Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 400 pages
• Publisher: W.W. Norton & Co.; 1st American Edition edition (May 18, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0393065049
• ISBN-13: 978-0393065046
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (67 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #66,509 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

33 of 36 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Compelling: strikes a good balance between naivety and cynicism, March 29, 2009

By	G. M. Arnold "Geoff, that is" (Palo Alto, CA USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

(What's this?)

My initial encounter with The Increment was unpromising: an omniscient narrator remarking about the actions of the central characters in Tehran and Washington. Fortunately, the narrator's voice was soon muted, and we were embroiled in a beautifully contrived tale of espionage, betrayal, and geopolitics. On one hand, the idealists; on the other, the cynical opportunists; caught in the middle, those who are revolted by both extremes.

I won't provide any spoilers, because you really should experience the twists and turns of this narrative for yourself. Ignatius gets extra points for the compelling picture he conjures up of contemporary Tehran (and the rest of Iran). However he loses a star for the gung-ho use of technology, and for a couple of lazily stereotyped characters. Taken together, these factors made a couple of his plot twists wholly implausible. But never mind: it's a most enjoyable read.

14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Solid Anti-War Spy Thriller, May 2, 2009

By	Douglas S. Wood "Vicarious Life" (Monona, WI) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)

WAPO foreign affairs columnist David Ignatius has turned out an anti-war spy thriller for liberals - and anyone else who likes heart-pounding adventure with a side of smarts. An Iranian nuclear scientist does a virtual walk-in and reports Iran is working on the nuclear trigger. Career CIA officer Harry Pappas soon is in a race against White House war fever to find out what this "Dr. Ali" is really saying. The Iranians are trying to build the bomb, but progress is oddly evasive.

Suffering deep guilt for not having warned off his now dead Marine son about the stupidity of the Iraq effort, Pappas uses a back-channel to hook up with the Brits for access to their agents inside Iran. Or rather he hooks up with a particular Brit who Pappas worked with in the past. Pappas soon finds himself in the inevitable hall of mirrors where the question of who is doing what for whom always has two or three plausible answers.

The Brits mobilize a special unit called The Increment to arrange a face-to-face meeting with Dr. Ali - by penetrating Iran with a 3-person team. The members of the Increment have the `00' license-to-kill and they need it. Besides Iranian security, they are also up against an opponent who lives and kills in the shadows.

Ignatius also plays out a large part of the book inside Iran, which is interesting in its own right due to the relative lack of information in the US about life in Iran. However, the motivations of the Iranian scientist could be more fully and plausibly developed.

Ignatius strains credulity at times, but one suspects he intends to do so. The Increment backmatter touts echoes of Graham Greene and John Le Carre`, I would add Ian Fleming to that list. A satisfying read for fans of the spy thriller genre.

25 of 30 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars A few demerits but a readable spy thriller, May 2, 2009

By	A. Dent "Aragorn" (Minas Anor, GD) - See all my reviews (TOP 10 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

(What's this?)

A young Iranian scientist, working on his country's own Manhattan project decides, more or less out of the blue, that he'd rather be a traitor than continue with his life as a privileged and respected scientist. It's easy for Iranians to pass the CIA some of the most classified Iranian documents - they simply log into CIA's Web site and upload them. Or so this story goes. The evidence is exactly what some of the more bellicose US presidential advisers are looking for - the pretext to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" as one of the more humor-gifted US presidential candidates used to joke - and, following the glorious freedom-spreading successes in Iraq, the US is poised to whack Iran into liberty, democracy and unrestricted rock & roll.

This is where Pappas, the head of the Iranian desk at the CIA comes to shine. He goes beyond his call of duty to prevent the upcoming war. It's not easy but Pappas is resourceful and determined and his British friends seem to be on his side even when they are really implementing someone else's private agenda.

A lot of the book is atmosphere as the author seems to attempt to inject a large dose of Euro-Middle Eastern sophistication and ambiguity into his work - and he makes sure that we are made aware of it. The Iran of this book, as the author himself admits, is a product of his imagination aided by some readings from sources such as 'The Lonely Planet' and the author's own 2-week recent stay in Tehran. It's the well-meaning CIA vs. the crazy warmongers prodding the president toward a new war and sometimes it feels like we are re-reading the newspaper and magazine articles of a few years ago. It's the British secret service, corrupt and corrupting. It's hundreds of pages of competently written prose where not much is happening but the stage is being set for a possible final confruntation which, consistent to the 'shades of gray' and Euro-Middle Eastern sophistication theme never really takes place. The Iranian traitor is afraid but he cries himself into staying a likable traitor and further helping the CIA to help the US destroy his country. The CIA chief has personal issues but he manages to stay clean even though he sometimes succumbs to the world stage ambiguities and he finds himself shaking hands with 'the terrorist'. The Brit agent is rotten to the core but he can be a good friend, the Arab businessman is sophisticated and nuanced beyond comprehension with more penumbras than Rembrandt could have ever dreamed, the Iranians other than the youthful traitor are all the simplistic cliches we read about in America's monthlies.

In the end, the story is unconvincing on more than one level. The Iranian traitor's motivation is way too thin to persuade. Since the author insists in portraying him as a 'good guy' who does it all out of high principles it's hard to understand the principles behind him offering his country's enemy a pretext to kill thousands of his fellow Iranians. The shadowy Arab puppet master, holding the MI5 in one pocket and the Iranian leadership in another is even less believable. The technology and the gadgets are laughable. Not replying to an email received on a Blackberry does NOT prevent the CIA or the NSA or even the phone company from knowing that the Blackberry was physically in London when the email was delivered. Satellites, even the secret ones, can NOT monitor an entire country continuously, allowing the CIA bosses to watch videos of past events anywhere - it would be a long explanation but the bottom line is that the CIA can't bypass the laws of physics. A device that can 'reprogram' microprocessors from a distance is not possible with today's technology and it's unlikely to be possible in 100 years. Oh, and the plugs for Fareed Zacharia's and Thomas Friedman's books are somewhat bizarre - the author's friends, I suppose - and they appear to be forced into the narration.

As far as spook thrillers go, the Increment does raise to the level of a passable airport book. The exotic locales and the author's apparent familiarity with the local topography and customs did keep me interested and did motivate me to finish the book, hoping for some unexpected and climactic finale. But, here I am, having read the last page and the author's afterword and... no climax.

It's three stars for the sometimes good research - gadgetry and technologies excluded - and for the author managing to produce a largely readable tome. I have little doubt that Mr. Ignatius is capable of much, much better. He should try harder.