Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy) (Paperback)

~ Robert Audi (Author) "As I look at the green field before me, I might believe not only that there is a green field there but also that I..." (more)
Key Phrases: imaging blue waters, epistemic chains, imaging cool blue waters, New York, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"No less than one would expect from a first-rate epistemologist who is also a master expositor....A superb introduction." -- Ernest Sosa, Brown University

Epistemology is simply the best textbook in epistemology that I know of.
–Thomas Vinci, Dalhousie University, Canada

Praise for the first edition A state-of-the-art introduction to epistemology by one of the leading figures in the field.
–William Alston, Syracuse University

No less than one would expect from a first-rate epistemologist who is also a master expositor....A superb introduction.
–Ernest Sosa, Brown University

Product Description

Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, is concerned with how we know what we do, what justifies us in believing what we do, and what standards of evidence we should use in seeking truths about the world and human experience. This comprehensive book introduces the concepts and theories central for understanding knowledge.

The revised edition of this hugely successful book builds on the topics covered in the first edition and includes new material on subjects such as virtue epistemology, feminist epistemology and social epistemology. The chapter on moral, scientific and religious knowledge has also been expanded and revised. Robert Audi's style is exceptionally clear and highly accessible for anyone coming to the subject for the first time.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 384 pages
• Publisher: Routledge; 2 edition (December 23, 2002)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0415281091
• ISBN-13: 978-0415281096
• Product Dimensions: 8 x 6 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #336,640 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars An eye-opening examination of knowledge, belief, and justification, November 22, 2006

By	Daniel R. Greenfield "Dan" (Wisconsin, United States) - See all my reviews

I read this book very carefully, covering only about four pages per day. Admittedly I learned a lot from struggling through it. For example, what is called prima facie knowledge: that is knowledge that can be defeated; it is not infallible. Almost all our knowledge is of this quality. There is also an excellent discussion of the difference between a posteriori and a priori, between analytic and synthetic. Also dealt with in detail is the subject of inference, and the difference between a deductive inference and an inductive one. The topic of justification and justified belief is also considered in great detail, and the careful reader will gain a thorough understanding of what justification means. The penultimate chapter on scientific, moral, and spiritual knowledge is first rate. The book is geared toward the current state of the art of this subject, and there is relatively little historical perspective. Audi actually is doing philosophy here, and not writing ABOUT it. That is the book's strength, and also its weakness.

The other reviewers' criticism that there is virtually no discussion of the historical evolution of this branch of philosophy is a valid critique. There is in fact little mention of any philosophers at all, except for a very few contemporary ones, such as Plantinga, Quine, Davidson, mentioned not in the main text but in the footnotes. There is a lot of hair-splitting analysis going on in this text as you might expect. Many paragraphs are spent examining all the minute wrinkles of a particular argument, only to cast it aside several pages later. While it is instructive to see a first-rate philosopher at work, I do really wish Audi had injected a little more historical background into this work. I have subtracted one star for this deficiency. However, it is a minor flaw in an otherwise great book.

Audi's writing is mostly a pleasure to read; he is thorough, elegant, precise. He does not repeat himself, or belabor a point repetitiously. He is an excellent teacher. As far as the book itself is concerned, there are very few typos (I counted two), the typography is excellent, the binding only OK (referring to the paperback version). The book is marketed as a Contemporary Introduction to Epistemology, but it is more a book for those who are already conversant in the subject from an earlier course or book. On the whole, it is a commendable work for those needing no historical background. Graduate students in philosophy or the sciences should greatly benefit from this book. For undergrads who tackle this book hoping to gain some perspective on the entire subject and its illustrious history, it will probably be a disappointment. However, anyone who reads the book carefully will learn a lot. In fact, it may even change some of your beliefs. It is a book which stimulates the mind, and even opens up new possibilities.

13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Mediocre, December 8, 2006

By	Calion (Murphysboro, IL United States) - See all my reviews

Audi has a reputation as one of the best epistemologists working today, and this book is nothing if not thorough. If there is an angle to view, if there is a slice to be made, Audi views it or makes it. Also, I approve of his approach: He stakes out a claim and tries to support it while meticulously showing competing viewpoints and their rationales. This is superior to the agnostic or relativist position some other philosophy primers take, where the author's attempt at an unbiased approach leaves the reader unsure as to what the right answer might be, or whether there is a right answer at all. Audi's approach allows the reader to agree or disagree with his stand, and helps the reader to develop and confirm his own viewpoint.

So much for the positive.

Audi is very difficult to read. His writing style is at the same time effusive and dense; he makes intricate (I might even say unnecessary) distinctions on every topic and subtopic, and does so in a way that you have to pay very close attention to the precise wording he uses to have a chance of understanding the divisions he makes. He either needs to make fewer categorical distinctions, or take the time to explain them more clearly. I'm an undergraduate senior in Philosophy, and if I had been reading this book on my own instead of for a class with a professor to help interpret it for me, I would have had no chance of understanding much of it without outside reading--which a primer such as this is not supposed to need. There were times even my professor wasn't quite sure what Audi was trying to say.

I also disagree with the way he attacks the subject matter. He deals with skepticism last, for one, which I think needs to be addressed (at least to some extent) first. More importantly, he goes through the book trying to analyze knowledge by appealing to a kind of common-sense generic understanding of it, and only toward the end actually tackles a definition of knowledge. Never does he even address the question of what is the ~nature~ of knowledge, whether it is something independent of us, or merely an internal concept. Perhaps other people's brains work this way, but I need to start by asking what a thing is, and trying to find a definition of it, and only then trying to analyze what it does and how it works. Audi takes the exact reverse approach.

I recommend this book to someone already versed in Epistemology that wishes to expand their understanding of the field, but I do ~not~ recommend it to a beginner (even an intelligent and well-educated beginner) as an introduction to Epistemology.

26 of 38 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Good account of epistemology, but without science, October 29, 2004

By	Todd I. Stark "Cellular Wetware plus Books" (Philadelphia, Pa USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This book is an excellent and relatively unpartisan account of the classical views of knowledge, where it comes from, and how it is justified. It is also very strong on explaining the reasoning behind these views.

It is also extremely frustrating if you come to this subject from a cognitive neuroscience or psychology background hoping to sort out the relationship of scientific theories of brain and mind and the classic epistemological question. I come to this book not as a philosophy student but as an interested outsider who is accustomed to interdisciplinary accounts relying on science to some extent to help address philosophical questions, and vice versa. With that expectation, this book just does not do a very good job clarifying things in terms of modern science, or even discussing the relationship of classical epistemology with science.

Much better books on modern epistemology that at discuss the relationship of classical epistemological questions and testable scientific theories include: "Inquiry and Evidence" by Susan Haack, and Alvin Goldman's work. Unfortunately, those don't serve as well as an introduction to the reasoning behind the epistemological questions, and they require some background in the basics to appreciate. Michael Williams' "Problems of Knowledge" is another good introduction that some will find a little more accessible that Audi.

If you're willing to dig in and deal with learning the foundations of epistemology independently of science, this book seems to be particularly good. However if you want a good broad overview of what we know about the mind and knowledge right now covering all disciplines, this will definitely dissappoint.