Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Timeless (no pun intended), January 24, 2001
These stories have not lost a step in the 100+ years since they were written, and they capture the imagination as well as anything since captured on film or in print. The invisible man is a great villain- evil enough to disdain, complex and tortured enough to make you wonder if you should pity him as well. The Time Machine is brilliant all the way through, from its inception in the study of the Time Traveler's home to the end, when he travels millions of years in the future to scurry back to his machine at sight of a huge amorphous form in the distance. Wells' depiction of the distant future seems no less accurate- and is no less exciting- than any since described anywhere.
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Classic tales from a pioneer of american Science-Fiction., January 29, 1997
By A Customer
H. G. Wells is one of the earliest pioneers of Science-Fiction writings. In this book, two of his most classic stories are told. It makes one wonder how a man of the late 1800's could come up with ingenius ideas as time travel and invisibility. The Time Machine and The Invisible Man portray the imaginary strengths of H.G. Wells
The Time Machine is a story told by a time traveller to a group of local dignitaries. He tells about his trip to the year 802,701 A.D. and how the world has degressed slowly technologically and how humans evolve to two seperate species. One species is peaceful and kind earth-dwelling vegetarians, while the other species are nocturnal cave dwellers who happen to be cannibals. The time machine is stolen from the time traveller and he must find it to get back to his own world.
The Invisible Man accounts of a personal story of a man who comes upon the means to become invisible. After becoming invisible, he finds out that living in the world was going to be different. Read about how he finds shelter, clothing, and food. The Invisible Man goes into a mad-panic and starts murdering innocent people. Now the townspeople must fight back--if they can find him
|
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
This edition is comical; avoid., February 15, 2008
1 star for the edition, 5 stars for the stories = 3 stars.
Imagine that you are the typical Barnes and Noble customer. You like to walk in, grab a coffee, roam around for awhile, and look for good books and good deals. You wander up to the Barnes and Noble Classics section, and spot `The Time Machine' and `The Invisible Man', both by H.G. Wells, in one book for 5 bucks. "I've always wanted to read H.G. Wells," you think to yourself. You pay for it and head to a chair with your still warm coffee to sit down and do a little fun science fiction reading. As with all Barnes and Noble Classics, this one has an introduction by some supposed literary expert, so you start with that. This one is written by Alfred Adam, a comparative literature professor.
Soon you learn from Mr. Adam that his book is not science fiction, but instead is dark social commentary. Before you realize it, you're plunged into an analysis of Marxian thought tied up with Hegelian history and Well's own experiences in the late 19th century. Worse, before having even read either of the stories you know (for example, in The Time Machine) the central characters, the races of the future and how they relate to Well's view of the "loss of human consciousness," vital plot points no `introduction' should include, and an analysis of the ending! And the same occurs with his description of `The Invisible Man.' For example; on the last page of the introduction is an exact description of what happens to the invisible man at the end of the story. Before you even get to the stories, you find yourself already depressed at what Mr. Adams takes as Well's vision of the world, as well as having read plot spoilers and the endings to each story. Somehow un-fazed, you drive on.
So you begin to read the story. However, before you even get past the first sentence you begin to encounter bizarre footnotes. The same person who already ruined the stories for you has followed you into the stories themselves! And for whatever reason (my guess is that he is a little elitist), he seems to feel the need to translate words he doesn't think you'd understand. Vastly difficult words like `unhinged' and `saddle,' which he helpfully tells you mean `upset' and `bicycle seat.' You can't help but chuckle to yourself as you read these footnotes, yet you find yourself irritated at the fact that you were interrupted in order to find out the meaning of the verb `to dress' (`put on an evening dress, or tuxedo, for dinner.')
But the fun doesn't end there. There are endnotes as well! These mostly lack the comical nature of the footnotes (mostly; note 7 of chapter 1 of `The Time Machine' informs you that when the narrator spoke, and describes the sentence with "said I", that this is the narrator speaking and is therefore an objective viewpoint.)
You do manage to make it through `The Time Machine," as it is fairly short, though not without struggle. You fight off the urge to go put the book you bought back on the shelf, or better yet in the garbage, or better yet to go put all the remaining copies in the `humor' section. Instead, you cut your losses and walk out the door. As you do, you think to yourself, "Well, this edition took all the joy out of reading what should be an enjoyable story..."
In all seriousness, do not buy this edition. Yes, you get two H.G. Wells' stories in a compact book for $5, but there are much better editions out there for not much more. Or read it online. When I read older `classics,' I already have a good idea of what the book will be like, or about. Then I just want a cheap edition in which to read it. I very much enjoyed both `The Time Machine' and `The Invisible Man.' But the edition should allow me to read the stories without distraction, and the intro should be a little background on the author and the period in which it was written. This introduction was completely misplaced, and the footnotes were comical. Avoid this book; buy a different edition.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|