See buying choices for this item to see if it's one of the millions that are eligible for Amazon Prime.

25 used & new from $4.10

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust Holocaust And The David Irving Trial
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get yours here.
 
  

Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust Holocaust And The David Irving Trial (Hardcover)

by Richard J. Evans (Author) "What is historical objectivity?..." (more)
Key Phrases: gassing facilities, second defendant, objective historian, Second World War, David Irving, Third Reich (more...)
3.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (46 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


5 new from $15.00 20 used from $4.10
Also Available in: List Price: Our Price: Other Offers:
Paperback $17.50 $15.75 48 used & new from $6.15

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory

Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory

by Deborah E. Lipstadt
3.7 out of 5 stars (41)  $11.56
History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (P.S.)

History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (P.S.)

by Deborah E. Lipstadt
3.9 out of 5 stars (35)  $12.71
The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial

The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial

by Robert Jan van Pelt
4.3 out of 5 stars (6)  $30.89
Holocaust Denial: The David Irving Trial and International Revisionism

Holocaust Denial: The David Irving Trial and International Revisionism

by Kate Taylor
The Holocaust on Trial

The Holocaust on Trial

by D. D. Guttenplan
3.5 out of 5 stars (17)  $10.85
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal
As an expert witness for the defense in last year's Irving-Lipstadt trial, Evans (history, Cambridge Univ.) was charged with determining whether David Irving was, as Deborah Lipstadt asserted, a Holocaust denier. Evans spent two years researching Irving's work, tracing his sources, and then evaluating his publications and public speeches. Moving easily from analysis of Irving's abuse of primary documents to a discussion of what constitutes legitimate historical methodology, Evans presents compelling proof that Irving is a Holocaust denier and why he should not be considered a legitimate member of the historical profession. Evans's depiction of the trial and of Irving's behavior in court is followed by an assessment of the implications of the judgment in Lipstadt's favor. Evans's point that some commentators seemed to forget that it was Irving who was attempting to silence Lipstadt, rather than academic historians and "Jewish interest groups" attempting to stifle free speech, is well worth remembering. Evans eloquently argues that what was really on trial was history itself. Fortunately, history won. Ironically, Evans's carefully documented book has not yet been published in the U.K., as Irving's threats to bring a libel suit have already caused one company to drop publication. Highly recommended. Frederic Krome, Jacob Rader Marcus Ctr. of the American Jewish Archives, Cincinnati
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Booklist
When Deborah Lipstadt's Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (1993), a groundbreaking book about the disturbing movement to refute the reality of the Holocaust, was published, one of the writers identified as a Holocaust denier, the Englishman David Irving, sued Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin, for libel. Although Irving never earned a degree, he has written nearly 30 books about Hitler and other related subjects. His contention, therefore, was that Lipstadt had denigrated his work as a historian by accusing him of distorting the historical record to support his extreme anti-Semitic politics. The defense had to prove that Irving, in fact, had deliberately misrepresented the contents of relevant documents to conform to his sympathetic view of Hitler and his belief that nothing on the order of genocide occurred under Nazi rule. Evans, a Cambridge-based historian who specializes in modern German history, was retained by the defense as an expert witness, and he chronicles his arduous research effort with impressive lucidity. At question was the very bedrock of history: Is there such a thing as historical objectivity? Or, as Evans writes, "How do we know when a historian is telling the truth? . . . Wasn't it all a matter of interpretation?" Sensitive to these conundrums and the high emotional valence attached to the Holocaust, Evans was scrupulous in his examination of thousands of pages of documents, assiduously evaluating Irving's interpretation of such primary sources as Goebbels' diaries, always on the lookout for evidence of inaccuracies and bias. He found plenty, and he describes his discoveries with quiet and contagious excitement. By sharing his vast insider's knowledge and recounting his surreal experiences on the stand as Irving, who represented himself, conducted his chaotic cross-examinations, Evans enables readers to fully appreciate the significance of both Lipstadt's victory and Irving's exposure as exactly what he claimed not to be. There is such a thing as truth, and history, responsibly practiced, will reveal it. Donna Seaman
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books (March 6, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465021522
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465021529
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.2 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (46 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #923,973 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.



Books on Related Topics (learn more)
 
The Third Reich by Dr. Michael Burleigh
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust Holocaust And The David Irving Trial
57% buy the item featured on this page:
Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust Holocaust And The David Irving Trial 3.7 out of 5 stars (46)
The Third Reich in Power
13% buy
The Third Reich in Power 4.6 out of 5 stars (32)
$13.60
The Coming of the Third Reich
12% buy
The Coming of the Third Reich 4.5 out of 5 stars (64)
$12.24
The Third Reich at War
12% buy
The Third Reich at War 4.2 out of 5 stars (32)
$26.40

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
Check the boxes next to the tags you consider relevant or enter your own tags in the field below.

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
Help others find this product — tag it for Amazon search
No one has tagged this product for Amazon search yet. Why not be the first to suggest a search for which it should appear?

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

 

Customer Reviews

46 Reviews
5 star:
 (19)
4 star:
 (13)
3 star:
 (5)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (8)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.7 out of 5 stars (46 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
77 of 106 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Valuable and Necessary Book, July 3, 2002
This book is an outcome of the libel trial brought by David Irving against Penguin Books (in general) and Deborah Lipstadt (specifically). A historian and modern social commentator, Deborah Lipstadt had referred to Irving as a Holocaust denier (and a poor historian) three or four times in a nearly 600-page book. Irving took exception and sued her for libel. He waited to sue her in England where the burden of proof is on the defendant, not the Plaintiff. Evans was one of the many historians asked, by the defense, to prove that Lipstadt was not committing libel when she called Irving a Holocaust denier.

Evans has consequently built up a massive body of evidence to show that Irving continually, and with knowledge, suppressed historical facts and documents to support his position. Evans presents both the process of his investigation and the conclusions that he reached. Evans makes a formidable case. He points successfully to incident after incident where Irving knew that information was incorrect and still used it. Evans also points out that Irving's "mistakes" were all in one direction, not chaotic as one might expect from a researcher that didn't have enough time on his hands or was uncertain about his material.

Lying About Hitler clarifies a number of issues, the first being that Irving was not the defendant (I thought so when I first heard about the case). Irving was suing Lipstadt, not the other way around. It was Lipstadt's freedom of speech (and Penguin Books') that was under attack. If Irving had won, he and others like him would have been able to stop (or attempt to stop) anyone who called them liars or disagreed with their position.

Another issue Evans deals with is the "but history is so hard to interpret" argument. Evans points out, again and again, that this trial was not about the interpretation of historical facts but the misuse of historical documentation (either invented or avoided). Evans' chapter on Irving's research of the bombing of Dresden is fascinating in this regard.

This kind of book confirms the importance of historical research for its own sake. History is so easily (and so often) manipulated for political purposes (on both sides of the fence). It is so much more important to figure out what happened and why as objectively as possible than to "prove" political agendas.

Recommendation: Buy it in paperback or hardcover. If you don't have the cash, take it out of the library. It is definitely worth a read.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
39 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Let's think about this for a moment, July 2, 2004
As far as I can tell, most of the negative reviews could easily have been writted by people who simply objected to a summary description of the book, even if that isn't the case. They all bemoan the silencing of someone who would "dare" to reexamine the official version of historical events. It seems that these people keep missing a rather obvious point. Irving was the PLAINTIFF in the trial, NOT THE DEFENDANT. No one put Irving on trial; rather, Irving was trying to destroy the career of a person who had dared to doubt HIS version of Holocaust events. So all of those reviews complaining that this book is yet another attempt to silence an historian who breaks from the official line are totally missing the point: it was Irving who was attempting to silence academic discourse. Which makes most of the defenses of him shown in these reviews completely moot. Had Irving respected the right of others to disagree with him, even to very vocally and bitterly disagree with him, his career would be intact and this book would never have been written. And to the reviewer who claimed that Evans only wrote the book to make money: How, exactly, do you think academics earn their living?
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
55 of 78 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars This book should be translated into Japanese, July 19, 2001
After I started reading Richard J. Evans’ LYING ABOUT HITLER, I couldn’t put it down. This is a well-organized, thoroughly researched account, intellectually stimulating and yet entertaining. Based on his “expert report” as one of the expert witnesses for the defense in the Irving vs. Penguin Books/Lipstadt case, the Cambridge historian Prof. Evans meticulously shows how the British author David Irving has falsified, distorted, misinterpreted, and misrepresented historical evidence to fit it with his special agendas. Proved as a problematic “historian,” a racist, and a Holocaust denier in the British High Court, Irving lost the libel case in which HE had sued the American scholar Deborah Lipstadt (and her publisher), who had accused him of being an abuser of history and a “denier” in her 1993 book. LYING ABOUT HITLER not only explains how the author proved Irving’s intentional distortion of historical evidence, but also interweaves the reactions to the trial among the media and professional historians.[....]

This book includes seven chapters and detailed notes (good historians always use notes). Chapter 1 discusses the reputations of Irving’s works among professional historians and journalists, while explaining how Evans got involved in the case as an expert whose job was to prove Irving’s abuse of historical record. The chapter shows that although some historians have already pointed out the problems in Irving’s methodology, there are other scholars and journalists who have praised Irving’s works.

In Chapters 2, 3, and 5, Evans proves how Irving has deliberately falsified and distorted historical evidence. In order to support his favorite themes (e.g. Hitler tried to stop violence against the Jews), Irving intentionally manipulated primary sources. His methods include: claiming something that the source did not say; ignoring unfavorable parts within a document; using untrustworthy witnesses (e.g. Hitler’s sympathizers); doubting the authenticity of a document that did not support his thesis; and even using forged documentation. It was a challenging and painstaking job to examine Irving’s works (about 30 books) along with thousands of pages of documents and many other materials. Yet, Evans succeeded his task in court and in this book.

Chapter 4, “Irving and Holocaust Denial,” first defines what the Holocaust deniers (they call themselves “revisionists”) are trying to prove in order to minimize or smash the significance of the Holocaust. Then, mainly by examining Irving’s public speeches, Evans verifies Irving’s association with deniers, especially a group in California, the “revisionist” center of the US. Evans informs us that the group started with Holocaust-bashing agendas, backed by extreme right-wing figures and organizations, and has maintained itself so since.

Chapter 6, “In the Witness Box,” is quite entertaining. It includes how Evans presented his findings in court and how Irving responded in cross-examination (he represented himself). Irving’s harassing and insulting manners constantly irritated the defense witnesses and lawyers as well as the judge. As the proceeding went on, however, it became apparent that Irving was losing self-control and falling apart. On one occasion, Irving, in a slip of the tongue, addressed the judge as “Mein Fuhrer.” Everybody in court laughed. How embarrassing! That clearly showed what sort of audience Irving usually had.

Chapter 7, “Judgment Day,” includes the court decision, vindicating Lipstadt’s claim. It also shows how Irving attempted to disgrace the judgment via the media after the trial. There were some journalists who were skeptical about the trial, fearing that freedom of speech was in danger. Evans, however, points out that these journalists tended to forget who had brought the case in the first place. Irving was the one who tried to jeopardize freedom of speech by suppressing Lipstadt’s book. Evans also shows that those historians who still believed that Irving was legitimate missed the point.

What did the trial teach us? For historians, as Evans puts, “It vindicated our capacity to know what happened after the survivors are no longer around to tell the tale.” For the public, as a journalist remarked, the case “reminded people of what happened there, and educated those who did not know about it.”

Reading this book and examining the recent Holocaust “revisionism” arguments, I discovered that some issues (e.g. “Holocaust myth” and doubt of the existence of gas chambers) that a Japanese friend thought legitimate have been used as propaganda for extreme right-wing/neo-fascist/neo-Nazi/racist groups! How scary! Perhaps, people in Japan can be susceptible to the misleading arguments by the “revisionists” because: (1) NOT all the recent works on the Holocaust and its “revisionism” are available in Japanese; (2) Updates on the recent Holocaust “revisionism” disputes (e.g. the Irving trial) are NOT always known well in Japan. I hope books like LYING ABOUT HITLER will be translated into Japanese soon.

Overall, Richard J. Evans’ LYING ABOUT HITLER presents an informative source, successfully integrating today’s hot issues and historical arguments. I would also recommend this book for historical methodology courses at college.

Comment Comment (1) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Irving never stood a chance.
Everybody loves to play the role of iconoclast. Dispelling popular myths and dashing cherished beliefs is sexy. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Benson Shays

3.0 out of 5 stars Verdict: Irving lied
I have been a big admirer of David Irving's for a long time, and still believe that he is head and shoulders above all other WWII historians when it comes to his writing skills... Read more
Published 3 months ago by J. Michael

5.0 out of 5 stars Unmasking a Phony, a Fake and a Fraud
This masterfully researched and well written book is the refutation to the King of the Holocaust Deniers, the brilliant researcher and Gold Medal con artist, Hitler-worshiping,... Read more
Published 17 months ago by George Haber

3.0 out of 5 stars A Tiny Bit of Perspective

Many of the comments about this book appear to have been written by people who have never read a David Irving book and have little (if any) interest in military history (or... Read more
Published 18 months ago by Only-A-Child

5.0 out of 5 stars Exposes a propagandist and liar
I have read several books on the Irving trial but I have not prior to this work read a book that so thoroughly discredits Irving. Read more
Published 18 months ago by I. Tysoe

5.0 out of 5 stars Forceful case against David Irving
As an American, I did not follow this libel trial when it was taking place in London. It was not widely covered here, and that is unfortunate. Read more
Published 21 months ago by Benjamin C. Gaumond

5.0 out of 5 stars A Great Book
This is a fascinating book on the Irving v. Lipstadt trial in the U.K. Evans, then "only" a top-notch historian, was the chief expert for Lipstadt. He analyzed Irving's work. Read more
Published 24 months ago by Skip Klauber

1.0 out of 5 stars Watse of Time
This is just one more Hilter book that quotes the lies of earlier Hitler books. Hitler was no prince and the Nazis were not the boy scouts, but if you take a balanced look at... Read more
Published on December 12, 2006 by Swan

5.0 out of 5 stars A Well-thought out and researched novel
In response to the review from 'Eric Rachut "Government doc"', I think that it is very important to point out that while people do need to read both sides of any story and decide... Read more
Published on May 2, 2006 by Tygrestick

1.0 out of 5 stars This book is a pack of lies!!!
David Irving, for those who read his books and read the Trial Transcripts, makes it quite clear that

1. The Jews were killed by the Nazis

2. Read more
Published on April 25, 2006 by Tom

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

 Beta (What's this?)
New! See all customer communities, and bookmark your communities to keep track of them.
This product's forum (0 discussions)
  Discussion Replies Latest Post
  No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]


   


Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)



Look for Similar Items by Category


$10 Instant Savings

Beauty Blender
Get a $10 instant rebate with orders of $100 or more on beauty products sold by Amazon.com. See details. Promo code: IOBeauty.

Shop all eligible items now

 

Best Books of 2008

Best of 2008
Find our top 100 editors' picks as well as customers' favorites in dozens of categories in our Best Books of 2008 Store.
 

Summer Reading for Kids & Teens

Summer Reading for Kids and Teens
Discover everything from beach reads and board books to teen romance and action-adventure series in Summer Reading for Kids & Teens. And, check off the kids' required reading lists in our Summer School Reading Store.
 

Rake In the Leaves

Shop for Rakes
There are as many types of rakes as there are landscapes. Browse through a wide selection of rakes in the Home Improvement Store.
 

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Where's My Stuff?

Shipping & Returns

Need Help?

Your Recent History

  (What's this?)
You have no recently viewed items or searches.

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Look to the right column to find helpful suggestions for your shopping session.

Continue shopping: Top Sellers
Glenn Beck's Common Sense
Glenn Beck's Common Sense
Darkfever
Darkfever by Karen Marie Moning
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan, Sir, 1859-1930 Doyle

Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates