|
45 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Interested in the New Cosmology? Keep looking..., January 14, 2001
In 1998 it was observed that the expansion of the Universe, known since 1913, is in fact accelerating. Not too long ago mainstream cosomology had believed that the expansion of the Universe was slowing down, and the only question was whether the attractive force of gravity would be enough to halt or perhaps even reverse the expansion. The 1998 observations thus set cosmology back on its haunches... engendering much new (speculative) thought.If you want an update on the new cosmology, this book is probably not what you want, for it turns out that Livio's main theme is Scientific Beauty. By that he means that in order to be valid a scientific theory must be beatiful, must be: 1. Simple 2. Symmetric 3. Copernician Although he recognises that to some extent his definition is arbitrary he hopes to persuade us that his definition is reasonable. He even goes so far as to offer his grand definition gussied up as THE COSMOLOGICAL AESTHETIC PRINCIPLE. I had two problems with this book: 1. Livio does not distinguish between beauty and truth. Aristotle found the symmetry of circles to be beautiful and invented a model of the universe in which planetary orbits were perfect circles. It was beautiful, but turned out to be unrelated to reality. Livio spends a good deal of his book discussing what he (and others) want to see in the Universe. Cosmologies are evaluated based on beauty - and it is easy to lose sight that we also want to know whether they represent reality. A theory may be beautiful and wrong. 2. Livio's discussion of various cosmologic theories is disjointed and fragmented. He says one thing on one page, and contradicts himself 50 pages later. This necessitates a great deal of flipping back and forth. Sometimes it then dawns on the reader that Livio is talking about a slightly different definitions. At other times we are just left wondering. Example: Livio tells us that inflation theory and observations strongly suggest that Omega is close to or exactly unity. Elsewhere he explains that this means the Universe is flat. Yet the 1998 observations of the accelerating expansion would seem to mean that the Universe is open, the geometry is negative. Perhaps all of the above seeming contradictory statements can be true at the same time, but Livio does not elaborate. I understand Livio's desire to avoid the dread mathematical equation for the lay public. There are, however, professionals in other fields who desire to become familiar with the latest is cosmology. Some concepts are made more clear by an equation or two. This would have been a much stronger book if he would have included, perhaps as optional explanatory notes, explanations that are a bit more complete than you get with words alone. This would have necessitated an equation or two but would have made the book much more valuable. It is interesting to see that thinkers in religion and cosmology both indulge themselves in the irrefutable hypothesis. If you want to pledge allegiance to, say, Eternal Inflation in which our Universe was ten to the hundredth power in line for creation, you need every bit as much faith as you do if you are enamoured with the Biblical Creation Myth. Punchline: If you want a brief review of the old cosmology as well as an introduction to what is currently going on - there has to be a better book out there somewhere. Dr. Roode proode@pol.net
|