|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The most important rejoinder to Huntington, April 10, 2009
Full disclosure: Patrick Jackson is a good friend and sometimes collaborator.
Civilizing the Enemy advances many important claims. The core of the book is a study of how policymakers, principally in the United States, legitimated the rehabilitation of western Germany, thus paving the way not only for its reconstruction as an industrial power but also its remilitarization. They did so, Jackson argues, by propounding a theory of "western civilization" that located Germany within the same community of values as the United States.
Political discourses of "Western Civilization" had other, if related, implications for American identity and foreign policy. Once people understood the American project--its experiment in liberty--not as something separate from Europe but as part of the destiny of an entity called "The West," it became increasingly difficult to justify traditional forms of US isolationism. Defending the American political project required defending "The West," a community that stretched from California to (at least) the Elbe.
What Jackson describes, in fact, is the naturalization of the concept of "Western Civilization." The notion of "the West" as a political community may now be taken as self-evident around the globe but, as Jackson shows, this is a relatively recent development. Jackson traces our current notion of "Western Civilization" to 19th Century German intellectuals, shows how ideas about "The West" were transmitted to American elites via Columbia University's "Contemporary Civilization" program. Founded in 1919 as a "why are we fighting World War I" class, Contemporary Civilization emerged as a model for subsequent courses--often called "great books" classes--that once flourished in American higher education. These are the very same courses that Alan Bloom lamented the passing of in The Closing of the American Mind, and which cultural conservatives often see as crucial to the defense of the "immemorial" western tradition.
In this respect, Jackson's book is also a direct--and perhaps the most important--rejoinder to Huntington's immensely influential The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Jackson not only proves that "The West" is an invented, and imagined, community, but offers an alternative understanding of what civilizations are and how we should think of them. In other words, unlike many of Huntington's other social-constructionist critics, Jackson thinks we should take civilizational politics seriously.
At the same time, Jackson's book is also a call to arms in ongoing debates in social theory and social-constructionist methodology. Jackson firmly rejects ways of thinking about the significance of rhetoric and argument that focus on the mental states of individuals. Invoking theorists from Wittgenstein (e.g., Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with a Revised English Translation 50th Anniversary Commemorative Edition) to John Shotter (e.g., Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind), Jackson develops a theory of "rhetorical commonplaces" and the consequences of their configuration for, in this study, American foreign policy.
Along the way, Jackson also challenges us to rethink the supposed "traditions" of American foreign policy and their relationship to one another over time and space (e.g., Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World). In addition, he elaborates the political significance of grounding political arguments in terms of "Western Civilization" rather than "Civilization," and shows how the use of the latter term links Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush.
This is a rich work, but it is also not one for a casual reader. Perhaps one day Jackson will write a popular version of the book, one that focuses on his important arguments about the nature and history of "Western Civilization." But, for now, he has given us a work that serious readers with a background in international relations, philosophy, social theory, and sociology will find challenging and provocative.
|