|
|
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Thought provoking and helpful, February 28, 2003
The heart of Achilles examines the ethical considerations set forth in the Iliad. Chapter 1 examines the psychological motives for behavior. Zanker says that the Homeric heroes were motivated by a system of shame and honor. For example, when the Trojans are gaining victory Hector urges them as such:Trojans! Lycians! Dardan fighters hand-to-hand! Fight like men, my friends, call up your battle fury- make for the hollow ships! I see with my own eyes how Zeus has blocked their finest archers arrows. Easy see what help Zeus lends to mortals, either to those he gives surpassing glory or those he saps and wastes, refuses to defend, just as he wastes the archives' power but backs us now. So fight by the ships, all together. And that comrade who meets his death and destiny, spirit or stabbed, let him die! He dies fighting for fatherland- no dishonor there! He'll leave behind him wife and sons unscathed, his house and estate unharmed-once these Argives sail for home, the fatherland they love." (Fagles, 15. 565 -- 579) The goal of their action is honor. And we can see in the same battle the Achean captains exhort their men with the flip side: "Shame, you Argives! All or nothing now- die, or live and drive defeat from the ships! You want this flashing Hector to take the fleet then each man walk the waves to regain his native land? Can't you hear him calling his armies on, full force, this Hector, wild to gut our hulls with fire? He's not inviting them to a dance, believe me- he commands them into battle! No better tactics now than to fight them hand-to-hand with all our fury. Quick, better to live or die, once and for all, then die by inches, slowly crushed to death- helpless against the hulls in the bloody press- by far inferior men!" Shame is to be dreaded, honor is to be sought. After Zanker lay the groundwork for the ethical, he examines the poems chief figure, Achilles. For Zanker, Achilles is challenging this traditional heroic code. Achilles is searching for a better reason to fight than personal glory (i.e. girls, gifts, gold, communal acclaim). Zanker's conclusions on these matters are thought-provoking. On one level this book is an aesthetic/ethical critical work. That is, a work that examines art and that that art demands an ethical response. On another level, this book is challenging previous (Kantian) ethical interpretations of the Iliad. The principal figure that Zanker is reacting to his Adkins. Zanker calls for a more perspectival look at the characters in the Iliad. I found this book accessible to me. I am not a Greek scholar. Zanker does not pretend that his audience is familiar with Greek. He does not quote from Greek like a lot of critical works on the Iliad. (This can be most frustrating because than the reader is forced to keep referring to his English translation.) This book obviously requires a working knowledge of the text of the Iliad. I recommend Robert Fagle's translation. This book help me understand the community of the Iliad. It helped me understand why the characters argue certain ways and responds certain ways. When I first read the Iliad i did not understand if character was saying something offensive or honorable. The community of the Iliad offers both sympathy and it challenges. In such an individualistic society as ours, we need to be reminded of camaraderie and honor. Personal gain is not enough, life is too short, where we go from here?
|