Essays on the Theory of Numbers (Paperback)

by Richard Dedekind (Author)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
Two most important essays by the famous German mathematician: First provides an arithmetic, rigorous foundation for the irrational numbers, thereby a rigorous meaning of continuity in analysis. Second is an attempt to give logical basis for transfinite numbers and properties of the natural numbers.

Product Details

• Paperback: 115 pages
• Publisher: Dover Publications (January 1, 1963)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0486210103
• ISBN-13: 978-0486210100
• Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 5.3 x 0.3 inches
• Shipping Weight: 5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #285,335 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

17 of 17 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Will Appeal to Students of Mathematics and Philosophy, November 23, 2003

By	Michael Wischmeyer (Houston, Texas) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

Richard Dedekind (1831-1916) is recognized as one of the great pioneers in the logical and philosophical analysis of the foundations of mathematics. Dedekind completed his doctoral studies under Gauss, was a friend of Cantor and Riemann, and worked under Dirichlet.

This inexpensive, 115-page book, Essays on the Theory of Numbers, contains two essays: his brief, famous essay Continuity and Irrational Numbers and his longer paper The Nature and Meaning of Numbers. This Dover edition (1963) is an unabridged and unaltered copy of the 1901 authorized English translation by mathematician W. W. Beman.

I particularly enjoyed his famous essay on the Dedekind cut and irrational numbers. Dedekind writes clearly and carefully and this first paper should appeal to all students of mathematics. The intent of the longer essay was to provide a logical basis for finite and infinite numbers as well as demonstrating the logical validity of mathematical induction. I had some difficulty with The Nature and Meaning of Numbers as some of Dedekind's terminology is outdated and unfamiliar.

Some statements can be reformulated easily to modern terminology. For example, simply substitute set for system and proper set for proper system. Dedekind uses the term transformation for function (or mapping). Inverse transformations and identical transformations are the same as inverse functions and identical mappings.

A system may be compounded from other systems (same concept as union of sets). The community of systems A, B, and C is the same as intersection of sets A, B, and C. While admitting that a null system has some value, Dedekind deliberately avoided using the concept of a null set in these essays. I did not at first recognize that similar or distinct transformations were equivalent to one-to-one mappings. I had difficulty with the Dedekind's use of the term chain when discussing the transformation of a system S into itself.

Dedekind was not successful in imposing his terminology on later mathematicians. Nonetheless, Dedekind's essays had considerable influence on mathematics, not only for their content, but for their clarity of expression.

Minor points: This 1901 translation often employs an unusual positioning of the verb 'is': If R, S are similar systems, then is every part of S also similar to a part of R. Also, while I encountered a few typos, none were particularly troublesome.

15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Accessible genius, October 13, 2000

By	Colin McLarty (Chardon, OH USA) - See all my reviews

This is not a book of "number theory" in the usual sense. It is a book combining two essays by Dedekind: "Continuity and irrational numbers" is Dedekind's way of defining the real numbers from rational numbers; and "The nature and meaning of numbers" where Dedekind offers a precise explication of the natural numbers (using what are now called the Peano axioms, since Peano made so much of them after reading Dedekind). They are essays in logic, or foundations of mathematics, or philosophy, as you like. And they are brilliant, readable, works of genius.

Probably the main value of the book is as an introduction to Dedekind's way of thinking about mathematics: his clarity, precision, and way of cutting to the bare core of a subject. You can find the same genius in Dedekind's THEORY OF ALGEBRAIC INTEGERS (available in a fine English translation by John Stillwell) but of course that is a more advanced text. The same style of thought works powerfully in all of Dedekind's mathematics. But most of it is very hard stuff. Here you see it in easily accessible form, suitable for even a smart high school student willing to think hard.

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars An interesting pair of historical essays, July 23, 2001

By A Customer

Richard Dedekind is one of the fathers of modern mathematical proofs. Reading his work will give you a glimpse into the early stages of this development. Indeed, his essay on Continuity and Irrational Numbers was, in part, written because Dedekind was trying to provide some rigor to what was not yet a rigorous science. The first essay is a classic. It is his description of a means of defining a number in a given space, which has since been referred to as a "Dedekind cut." His descriptions and proofs are exceptionally clear and straightforward. The second essay is a discussion of how a number system is constructed and its characteristics. It, too, shows Dedekind to possess a excellent ability to explain the ideas very clearly and simply.

There are two difficulties with the book, which I found serious enough to warrant only four stars. First, the terminology is rather antiquated, so that the descriptions are clear only once you are able to translate Dedekind's phrases; for instance, "a system S is compounded from the systems A and B" would today be written "the set S is the union of sets A and B." Second, there are a fairly large number of typos in the book, given its importance and the rigorousness of the work; for example, in the proof in paragraph 42 of The Meaning of Numbers, the phrase (not in Dedekind's shorthand) "the transformation of A is contained in B" should read "the transformation of A is contained in A." Most typos are as minor as this, but annoying in the unnecessary effort needed to bull ones way through them. A couple errors are more significant. I blame the translator and proofreader, not Dedekind.

All in all, the book is well worth the price and the effort to understand it.