Amazon.com: The World As Will and Representation: In Two Volumes, Vol. II: Arthur Schopenhauer, E. F. J. Payne: Books

Product Description

Volume 2 of the definitive English translation of one of the most important philosophical works of the 19th century, the basic statement in one important stream of post-Kantian thought. Corrects nearly 1,000 errors and omissions in the older Haldane-Kemp translation. For the first time, this edition translates and locates all quotes and provides full index.

Language Notes
Text: English, German (translation) --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Details

Paperback: 694 pages
Publisher: Dover Publications (June 1, 1966)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0486217620
ISBN-13: 978-0486217628
Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.4 x 1.6 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (31 customer reviews)

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #403,977 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

Look Inside This Book

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover

Citations (learn more)

100 books cite this book:

The Philosophy of Schopenhauer by Bryan Magee on 62 pages
Composing the Soul: Reaches of Nietzsche's Psychology by Graham Parkes on 11 pages
A Companion to Nietzsche (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy) by Keith Ansell Pearson on 10 pages
On the Basis of Morality by Arthur Schopenhauer on 9 pages
When Bad Things Happen to Other People by John Portmann on 8 pages

See all 100 books citing this book

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	82% buy the item featured on this page: The World As Will and Representation: In Two Volumes, Vol. II 4.7 out of 5 stars (31) $13.46
	8% buy World as Will & Idea (Everyman's Library (Paper)) 4.2 out of 5 stars (8) $10.36
	5% buy Essays and Aphorisms (The Penguin Classics) 4.8 out of 5 stars (28) $10.20
	3% buy Being and Time 4.2 out of 5 stars (51) $15.59

Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

(What's this?)

Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.

german literature(2)

germany(2)

philosophy(2)

schopenhauer(2)

german idealism(1)

See all 7 tags...

Help others find this product — tag it for Amazon search

No one has tagged this product for Amazon search yet. Why not be the first to suggest a search for which it should appear?

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

31 Reviews

5 star:		(26)
4 star:		(2)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(2)
1 star:		(0)

Average Customer Review

4.7 out of 5 stars (31 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

39 of 39 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A readable German philosophy that's worth reading!!!, November 30, 1998

By	dionysus (Sag Harbor, NY) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The World As Will and Representation, In Two Volumes: Vol. I (Paperback)

Schopenhauer proves that a German philosopher does not have to be nearly unintelligible to appear profound. Unlike Hegel and Heidegger, Schopenhauer does not hide behind ambiguous words or phrases. To the reader, Schopenhauer's views are as profound as they are clear. Starting where Kant left off, he gives new meaning to the word will; he makes will the thing in itself. Both volumes are essential reading. The first offers his entire system. From epistemology to metaphysics, to a great essay on where his philosophy differs from Kant's, the first volume is the foundation for the second. The second volume is classic Schopenhauer; this is the acid-tongued curmudgeon most people think of when they bother to think of him at all. The sections on death and the metaphysics of sexual love are mind-blowing. As it is expressed in his masterpiece, The World as Will and Representation, Schopenhauer's genius and originality of thinking tower over the views of most thinkers being pushed in universities today.

Comment Comment (1) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

107 of 118 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The vision of a giant mind., August 1, 2000

By	TheIrrationalMan (Basildon, United Kingdom) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The World As Will and Representation (2-Volume Set) (Hardcover)

Although the scientific premises of his philosophy are now considered outdated, Arthur Schopenhauer's contribution to modern philosophy continues to be an enduring and endearing one. Despite the fact that he wrote in the framework of Kantian idealism -- (with its dual-world metaphysics of "phenomenon" and "thing-in-itself") -- his thought has branched out into several directions, proving to be influential on some of the literary and philosophical luminaries of the nineetenth as well as the twentieth centuries. In his metaphysics, he was a voluntarist, propounding the nonrational, universal will as the ultimate reality (the "thing-in-itself") and the driving force behind all the manifestations of organic life as well as inorganic nature. The voluntarist doctrine of the will to power of Nietzsche was evolved from Schopenhauer, as well as the metaphysical vitalism of Bergson and, most patently, Freud's theory of the unconscious. In his epistemology, he was a phenomenologist and idealist, following the footsteps of Berkeley and the critical idealist Kant. In his aesthetics, he was a Platonist, holding the ontologically originary Form, or what he terms the "Platonic Idea" to be anterior to the aesthetic representation. In his ethics, he argued that to live means to desire and desire entails nothing but suffering. His reasoning was that desire induces suffering when it is frustrated from acquiring its object; upon overcoming its hindrances and realising its object, desire results in boredom since it has a new object in view and the cycle continues indefinitely. As such, desire leads inevitably to suffering. Schopenhauer's answer is asceticism ("the denial of the will-to-live"). The wise man does not commit suicide, but abstains from this life of useless striving and hopes for an annihilating death. In the meantime, he will look with compassion and pity upon his suffering fellow creatures. This element of Schopenhauer's philosophy reflects his unremittingly melancholy and pessimistic temperament, culminating, according to his biographer, in intense paranoia and the habit of sleeping at night with a loaded pistol tucked under his pillow. His ascetic morality is unique in modern Western philosophy. Being an atheist, Schopenhauer was arguably the first philosopher to effect a thorough break with the Judaeo-Christian tradition and to introduce strong elements of Eastern religion in his thought. (His voluntarism and asceticism have Hinduist and Jain Buddhist roots in the doctrine of reincarnation "metempsychosis" and the application of austerities upon oneself to liberate the soul from the karmic matter which magnetises it and causes it to be painfully reborn into the world of pain.) In terms of his style, he was an undisputed master of German prose style, writing in a lucid, witty and jargon-free Romantic "essay-style". He has exerted an influence on a number of key modern literary figures, such as Mann, Conrad and Hardy. His stress on style anticipates contemporary philosophising and its emphasis on literary form, as can be seen in the works of figures such as Derrida, Baudrillard, Heidegger, Deleuze et al. In addition, the unaffected purity of his philosophy is an indication of the great extent to which it approximates his own difficult and powerful personality. Only someone like Schopenhauer, whose character combined such a vehemence of desire along with such a brooding sensitivity to suffering, could have produced such a philosophy which argues for the most extreme restraining of desire. Altogether, "The World as Will and Idea" is a fascinating encounter with one of the most impressive thinkers of all time. Imagine it as an intellectual dialogue, an after-dinner debate in which you are challenged and entertained with the insights of a truly giant mind. Even if one does not share his assumptions, or agree with his conclusions, he still provokes those who read him with admiration and respect for his insight and genius.

Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

72 of 78 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A Life-Changing Book, January 2, 2005

By	Joseph Kimsey "Fareastnibelung" (Renton, WA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: The World As Will and Representation, In Two Volumes: Vol. I (Paperback)

I have spent this past year becoming quite acquainted with Arthur Schopenhauer. I can say, without hyperbole, that it has been an experience unlike any other. Unlike Kant, Hegel, and Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer's prose is consistently beautiful, and his literary style is essential in conveying truths about the world and ourselves that can be quite unpalatable. Schopenhauer's view of the world is bleak, and I agree with his assessment. He speaks of the blind drives and cruelties that motivate our species, and indeed the world itself, years before Nietzsche; and unlike Nietzsche he certainly did not embrace that cruelty.

As a metaphysician, Schopenhauer reveals many insights and a few weaknesses. S. appropriated several facets of Kant's transcendental idealism, but whereas Kant believed that all things possessed the attribute of "things-in-themselves", S. asserts that all things are comprised in essence as "Will". It is essential to grasp that S. defines "Will" as blind desire, NOT as a conscious universal mind (i.e., God). Schopenhauer's philosophy is thoroughly atheistic, although many of his philosophical insights slot neatly with Buddhism and parts of Hinduism.

Personally, I feel that of all the philosophers of transcendental idealism that came after Kant, Schopenhauer's system of blind will as the noumenal thing-in-itself to be the only one that is remotely plausible.

Schopenhauer's metaphysical insights on the arts are a mixed bag, but still intriguing. As a music lover, Schopenhauer unsurprisingly rates music as the greatest art and the sole art form that completely circumvents the will. In other words, music appreciation is completely contemplative, and does not involve egoism. I would rate music as the greatest of the arts too, but music can easily involve egoism: sensual music can make me desire sex, harsh music can make me feel abrasive, etc. In my opinion, his ranking of the arts, as a part of his metaphysical system, easily collapses when viewed as literal fact, but as poetic metaphor it works quite well.

Schopenhauer's greatest flaws are in the areas of natural science. His views on the development of consciousness are brilliantly insightful and slot easily with Darwinian theory, but he falls far short in denying the existence of atoms and preferring Goethe's theory of color over Newton's.

On ethics, S. is consistently insightful, but few would find his ethical thought attractive. Schopenhauer's beautiful prose on the essential irrelevance of death (especially in Volume II) is some of the most sublime there is. I mostly concur with Schopenhauer's views on animals, although I disagree with his belief that there is occasional justification for the exploitation of animals for human survival. As a vegan, I find Descartes', Spinoza's, and Kant's views on animals to be repulsive, so Schopenhauer's views are definitely an advance. Schopenhauer's view on sex is of the St. Augustine school, and as such I find it to be the least attractive facet of his ethical thought. S. was quite right in stating that our existence is permeated by sexual desire, but I disagree in trying to eradicate something that is the essence of all of us. It's much better, in my opinion, to indulge those desires responsibly, than repress what will always be there anyway.

Schopenhauer's endorsement of compassion is a wonderful antidote to Kant's flawed view of ethics. Whereas Kant tried to shepherd theology through the ethical backdoor, Schopenhauer rightly tells us that compassion, not rationality, is the basis of morality. Incidentally, it is well worth searching out Schopenhauer's hard-to-find book, "The Basis of Morality", which is a masterpiece of ethical thought.

Finally, there are Schopenhauer's pessimistic conclusions about life itself. He argues that there is no God, no soul, and no hope of a hereafter. I most heartily concur with his conclusions, and his eloquent description of the suffering of the world is necessary reading for both the shallow humanist and the pompous religious fundamentalist. It may disturb us to realize that we are at the mercy of blind forces largely beyond our control, but that same realization can make us more humane to each other, and to other species. It was Arthur Schopenhauer who so eloquently described our predicament, and for that I'll always be grateful.

Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 31 customer reviews...

Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Wrong, but genius.
Schopenhauer's masterpiece is divided into four parts:

I. The world as idea I.
II. The world as will I.
III The world as idea II.
IV. Read more

Published 15 days ago by W. Schultz

5.0 out of 5 stars A consoling masterpiece, a trusty friend for the rest of my life.
Imagine this. You are in your car at 3 p.m. on a Sunday afternoon. It's hot. You're painfully lonely, you have no friends to speak of. The sun is beating on your face. Read more

Published 2 months ago by Surge

5.0 out of 5 stars Schopenhauer says art really does get us to the Platonic universals
I read this book for a graduate seminar on the philosophy of art. It is important to note that the Germans look on art as more than art. Read more

Published 6 months ago by Michael A Neulander

5.0 out of 5 stars How is Hegel held over him?
I have read Schopenhauers works and would heartily agree with the other writers on its beauty, simplicity and philosophy. Read more

Published 23 months ago by KornTrickHick

5.0 out of 5 stars Towering work of genius from the philosopher of gloom
Arthur Schopenhauer is one of the most interesting great philosophers. A misogynist, misanthrope and great lover of music and art, he was kinder to his dogs than he was to... Read more

Published on November 17, 2006 by Greg

4.0 out of 5 stars More than a precursor to Nietzsche...
First, a word about the form of this two-volume work. Volume One contains the core of Schopenhauer's philosophy and is his one absolutely essential book. Read more

Published on August 23, 2006 by Brian A. Oard

5.0 out of 5 stars The Knight calmly facing Death and Devil!
Written when he was 30 Schopenhauer single-mindedly preserved the book and abstained form changing it in the subsequent decades and publications (however he wrote a supplemental... Read more

Published on March 9, 2006 by R. Hosseini

5.0 out of 5 stars Philosophy for independent thinkers
Schopenhauer's magnum opus towers high above the silly word games of the analysts. This book is philosophy at its very best- a book that no educated person should miss for... Read more

Published on December 3, 2005 by J. Duarte

5.0 out of 5 stars A monumental work
Though I am not completely sold to the idea that all life is but suffering and only a mere representation to the "Will's" endless striving, there is without a doubt that this book... Read more

Published on September 14, 2005 by A reader

5.0 out of 5 stars Timeless
As a philosophy student I appreciate any philosophical text that is clear and intelligible. The World as Will and Representaion is one of those philosophical texts... Read more

Published on July 30, 2005 by James P. Gibb

› See all 31 customer reviews...

.jsOffDisplayBlock { display: block; } .jsOffDisplayInline { display: inline; } .jsOffVisibility { visibility: visible; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayNoneBlock { display: block; } .jsOnDisplayNoneInline { display: inline; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; }

Customer Discussions

Beta (What's this?)

New! See all customer communities, and bookmark your communities to keep track of them.

This product's forum (0 discussions)

	Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
	No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight

Start a new discussion

Topic:

First post:

Receive e-mail when new posts are made

Prompts for sign-in

[Cancel]

Guidelines

Active discussions in related forums

Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
philosophy What does it take for a Proposition/Premise to be True...	15	24 minutes ago
philosophy Who's smarter? Einstein or Wittgenstein	21	1 hour ago
philosophy A Zoroastrian response to Tiantai	3	3 hours ago
philosophy Love.	80	16 hours ago
philosophy Eros in Mourning? (Henry Staten)	19	16 hours ago
philosophy Tiantai Buddhist Response to Hitler	61	21 hours ago
germany Germanophiles	56	9 days ago