Mad In America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and The Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill by Robert Whitaker
$11.90
|
Last Resort: Psychosurgery and the Limits of Medicine (Cambridge Studies in the History of Medicine) by Jack D. Pressman
$68.00
|
It is not a pretty picture, according to Braslow, who faults these California physicians for choosing "looking over listening." The story begins with a discussion of the physical restraints that were widely used around the time of World War I. This approach gave way to hydropathic treatment, an apparent therapy but in reality, according to Braslow, just an extension of the physicians' larger agenda of "discipline and control." This antipsychiatric note -- reminiscent of the work of Paris philosopher Michel Foucault -- rings throughout the book, the doctors with their single-minded agenda of ordering and disciplining, willing to alter the nature of their "therapeutic rationale" with every innovation.
Next in the parade of physical therapies was malaria-fever therapy for neurosyphilis, developed in 1917, followed by the various shock therapies of the 1930s: insulin coma (or shock) therapy, metrazol (pentylenetetrazol) shock therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy. The first machine for electroconvulsive therapy arrived at Stockton State Hospital in 1943 and was immediately enlisted in efforts to control patients' behavior. This, indeed, is the main theme in the therapeutic interventions of psychiatry, according to Braslow: electroconvulsive therapy permitted psychiatrists to see disruptive behavior not just as a problem of order in the institution, but as a sign of illness, a treatable disease. In his view psychiatrists were not interested in diagnosis. Control was their real agenda, and in the case of electroconvulsive therapy this meant controlling excitement, agitation, and the like. (This strikes me as a not unreasonable therapeutic objective, given that excitement in mania, for example, could have a fatal outcome.)
On the heels of electroconvulsive therapy followed far worse -- lobotomy -- and Braslow presents an unremitting chronicle of the unscientific mutilation of patients. Strikingly, at Stockton State, 85 percent of those subjected to lobotomy were women (the rate was 60 percent nationwide). Why so many women? Braslow argues that these psychiatrists found the body of a female patient to be a "more concrete, objective entity and hence more amenable to surgical intervention" than a male patient's body. Although these doctors were blind to sexual cues coming from men, from women such cues gave rise to an operative orgy. They even performed a clitoridectomy on four of their patients who underwent lobotomy.
The book's larger theme concerns "the power of biological therapies to alter the way in which doctors perceive both their patients and the doctor-patient relationship." There is truth in this, and Braslow's analysis of the experience of the women with some of these physical therapies is devastating. But his account is highly sectarian as well. Chlorpromazine, according to him, "was introduced in the early 1950s, because of its ability to control behavior." Coming from the psychiatric left, he bears a deep grudge against any approach that situates psychiatric illness in the brain, and he slides over the fact that some of these physical therapies had the capacity vastly to ameliorate patients' symptoms.
There is one more thing. Braslow writes with a light touch, and the book makes riveting reading, particularly the bits of dialogue between psychiatrists and patients that he excerpted from the transcripts. Anyone interested in learning how the arrogance of science and pseudoscience can lead medicine over the brink will profit from reading this biased but rewarding study.
Reviewed by Edward Shorter, Ph.D.
Copyright © 1998 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS.
Product Description
Mental Ills and Bodily Cures depicts a time when psychiatric medicine went to lengths we now find extreme and perhaps even brutal ways to heal the mind by treating the body. From a treasure trove of California psychiatric hospital records, including many verbatim transcripts of patient interviews, Joel Braslow masterfully reconstructs the world of mental patients and their doctors in the first half of the twentieth century. Hydrotherapy, sterilization, electroshock, lobotomy, and clitoridectomy--these were among the drastic somatic treatments used in these hospitals.
By allowing the would-be healers and those in psychological and physical distress to speak for themselves, Braslow captures the intense and emotional interplay surrounding these therapies. His investigation combines revealing clinical detail with the immediacy of "being there" in the institutional setting while decisions are made, procedures undertaken, and results observed by all those involved. We learn how well-intentioned physicians could rationalize and regard as therapeutic treatments that often had dreadful consequences, and how much the social and cultural world is inscribed within the practice of biological psychiatry. The book will interest historians of medicine, practicing psychiatrists, and everyone who knows or has seen what it's like to be in mental distress.
See all Editorial Reviews
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|