|
|
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The classical and largely skeptical SETI volume, revised, September 10, 1999
They aren't here, that's for sure-are is it? Nothing is sure in this wide-ranging collection of essays. Opinion seems fairly evenly divided: about half say we are probably alone in the galaxy, and the other half say we probably have intelligent neighbors. Clear to me is that extraterrestrial life is very, very likely, since life itself is probably-as several of the writers in this volume assert-an emergent property of matter and energy. "Intelligent" or communicating extraterrestrial life is another matter. The guess here is that it is much less common.Jared Diamond, who writes one of the essays, makes the point that intelligence, as we define it, has evolved here on earth only once, and so the argument from convergent evolution, sometimes advanced to support there being intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy, is not convincing. Diamond gives the example of the woodpecker which did not evolve in Australian, nor did any other bird converge sufficiently to assume the woodpecker's niche there. The damnable thing about the arguments both for and against intelligent extraterrestrial life is they are all based on assumptions: if your assumptions differ, your conclusions almost certainly will. Another problem is defining "intelligent" life, or even life itself, for that matter. One of the writers defines life in terms of matter that goes through a Darwinian evolution, which I guess is the way life is defined these days: seems strangely narrow, but maybe not. The amazing truth about intelligent life is we may be looking right at it and not recognize it! This is an excellent (although uneven) book that I read at varying degrees of attention: some of it is highly technical, and some is popular. It's revision of the 1982 edition. The title refers to the quote from Fermi, whose famous opinion about extraterrestrial intelligent life was summed up in the skeptical phrase: "Where are they?" What he meant was, if they existed they'd be here by now. This book addresses that argument, mostly in agreement with Fermi. One authority estimates that humanoid-like beings would have explored the entire galaxy in 60 million years. My question (and the question of others) is WHY would they? Further I suspect that ETI may not share our psychology, and have no desire to explore at all. Or may have no need to explore, or may have explored so long ago there is no trace...etc. One author comes close to the old idea that the stars themselves are "alive" by postulating life forms that live within the stars as "plasmobes." He even sees possible life on neutron stars. My bottom line belief is that intelligent life evolves into something that we can't recognize as being alive (and, paradoxically, maybe it isn't). It may be that life is just a primitive step on the way to Becoming; that our consciousness is just a trick of the evolutionary mechanism, and that it is information itself that is alive, and that "real" "intelligence" in the universe is something beyond our kin and beyond our ability to comprehend in the slightest, just as our day-to-day concerns are beyond the comprehension of a bacterium.
|