|
79 of 83 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The emotional competence framework, August 16, 2002
The author suggests five competencies in which we can manage ourselves: Self awareness (Emotional Awareness, self-accessment, self-confidence) Self Regulation (Self-Control, Trustworthiness, adaptiblity, innovation) Motivation (achievement driven, commitment, initiative, optimism) Empathy (understanding others, developing others, service oriented, politically aware), Social skills (influence, conflict management, leadership, catalyst, building bonds, collaboration and cooperation, and team). The book's frame-work focuses on the five competencies: Self-Awareness, Self-Regulation, Motivation, Empathy, and Social skills. I liked the personal stories illustrating the positive effects of soft skills. The storie sources came from friends, associates, and research cases. I disliked the conclusions drawn from the stories suggesting confidence in cause and effect of EQ results. I liked what Dr Goleman was advocating about the importance of people skills: social radar, arts of influence, and collaboration and teams. I disliked lack of detail methodology to achieve the desired results. I felt there was too much contrast between IQ verse EQ. The book provides a strong case argument for an investment in Emotional Intelligent. One shocking point the author makes early in the book, states that the top 1 percent of the Emotionally Intelligent in the IT field are 1200 percent more productive. I would have liked to read more cases studies about these observations and conclusions for his study. That statement alone sparked a ton of curiousity about EQ. I'm very interested in learning how effective IT managers are in accessing the emotional needs of their employees and customers and how to implement EQ to improve performance. I disliked the lack of practical application. There was a disconnect between converting ideas of EQ into action. I felt the book focused too much on the principles of EQ, rather than the practical application of EQ. Basically he did not effectively answer the question, " How can I uses the EQ in my job to make a difference." I didn't get the opportunity to say "cool EQ works for me"
|