The Imperial Presidency (Paperback)

~ Jr. Arthur M. Schlesinger (Author) "THE PLACE TO BEGIN is Philadelphia in the summer of 1787..." (more)
Key Phrases: constitutional comity, unwritten checks, emergency prerogative, United States, White House, Supreme Court (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., traces the growth of presidential power over two centuries, from George Washington to George W. Bush, examining how it has both served and harmed the Constitution and what Americans can do about it in years to come. The book that gave the phrase "imperial presidency" to the language, this is a significant work of historical scholarship.

About the Author

ARTHUR M. SCHLESINGER, JR., the author of sixteen books, was a renowned historian and social critic. He twice won the Pulitzer Prize, in 1946 for The Age of Jackson and in 1966 for A Thousand Days. He was also the winner of the National Book Award for both A Thousand Days and Robert Kennedy and His Times (1979). In 1998 he was awarded the prestigious National Humanities Medal.

---

Product Details Paperback: 624 pages Publisher: Mariner Books (August 12, 2004) Language: English ISBN-10: 0618420010 ISBN-13: 978-0618420018 Product Dimensions: 8.2 x 5.5 x 1.6 inches Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies) Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews) Amazon.com Sales Rank: #185,577 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

---

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Arthur Meier Schlesinger Page

Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
THE PLACE TO BEGIN is Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. Read the first page

Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
constitutional comity, unwritten checks, emergency prerogative, inherent presidential power, executive classification, presidential mystique, presidential supremacy, secrecy system, presidential usurpation, presidential right, presidential war, presidential domination, executive secrecy, warmaking power, presidential accountability, steel seizure case, imperial presidency, congressional consent, presidential presence, presidential abuse, pocket vetoes, executive privilege, presidential conversations, congressional government, concurrent authority

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
United States, White House, Supreme Court, Second World War, Secretary of State, State Department, Franklin Roosevelt, Electoral College, House of Representatives, New York Times, Vice President, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Top Secret, United Nations, New Deal, Andrew Jackson, Great Britain, Official Secrets Act, Tonkin Gulf, Woodrow Wilson, American Constitution, President Nixon, Theodore Roosevelt, John Quincy Adams, Justice Jackson

New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Citations (learn more)

100 books cite this book:

• Executing the Constitution: Putting the President Back into the Constitution (Suny Series in American Constitutionalism) by Christopher S. Kelley on 7 pages
• Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy by James M. Lindsay on 7 pages
• With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power by Kenneth Mayer on 6 pages
• All Things To All Men (A Touchstone Book) by Godfrey Hodgson on 6 pages
• Spaceflight and the Myth of Presidential Leadership by Roger D. Launius on 5 pages

See all 100 books citing this book

---

Books on Related Topics (learn more)

Worse Than Watergate by John W. Dean

Discusses:

• executive secrecy
• presidential accountability
• imperial presidency

The President, Congress, and the Constitution by Richard M. Pious

Discusses:

• unwritten checks
• emergency prerogative
• presidential usurpation

After the End by James M.Scott

Discusses:

• presidential supremacy
• presidential abuse
• White House

The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.

Discusses:

• emergency prerogative
• secrecy system
• presidential domination

Command Of Office by Stephen Graubard

Discusses:

• presidential presence
• executive privilege
• White House

War Powers by Peter Irons

Discusses:

• presidential supremacy
• presidential usurpation
• presidential war

Worse Than Watergate by John W. Dean Discusses: executive secrecy presidential accountability imperial presidency The President, Congress, and the Constitution by Richard M. Pious Discusses: unwritten checks emergency prerogative presidential usurpation After the End by James M.Scott Discusses: presidential supremacy presidential abuse White House The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. Discusses: emergency prerogative secrecy system presidential domination Loading...

---

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	70% buy the item featured on this page: The Imperial Presidency 4.8 out of 5 stars (8) $11.53
	9% buy The Crisis of the Old Order: 1919-1933, The Age of Roosevelt, Volume I 4.4 out of 5 stars (9) $11.56
	8% buy The Coming of the New Deal, 1933-1935 (The Age of Roosevelt, Vol. 2) 5.0 out of 5 stars (3) $12.21
	7% buy A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House 3.5 out of 5 stars (22) $12.21

Explore similar items

---

Tags Customers Associate with This Product  (What's this?) Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people. Check the boxes next to the tags you consider relevant or enter your own tags in the field below.  presidency(4) executive branch(3) imperial presidency(2) us government(2) See all 6 tags... Your tags: Add your first tag

Search Products Tagged with   See most popular tags

---

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

---

 

Customer Reviews

8 Reviews 5 star:  (6) 4 star:  (2) 3 star:    (0) 2 star:    (0) 1 star:    (0)           Average Customer Review 4.8 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews 51 of 57 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant and important., December 25, 2000 By  Mike Baum (Anchorage, AK USA) - See all my reviews    This review is from: Imperial Presidency (Hardcover) Whatever his shortcomings (see below), historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. has a great mind and writes with a silver pen. I am immensely impressed with his book on the growth of presidential power in America and cannot imagine a better introduction to my future studies on this important subject. The book's organization is superb. Appropriately, it first discusses the Founding Fathers' likely intentions in regard to the Presidency and where they disagreed amongst themselves. Next it explains the Presidency and its war power, tracing its development through the nineteenth century and into the twentieth, and paying special attention to the Second World War, the Korean War and Vietnam. Most of a 64-page chapter is devoted to President Richard M. Nixon's radical ideas and practices. Democracy and foreign policy is then treated, followed by the Presidency and its powers of secrecy, and finally, the Presidency and its future. As these subjects are dealt with, many facts are thrown at the reader, the totality being hard to absorb. Fortunately, nothing is explained in isolation. The author constantly backtracks, providing new historical context and rehashing material already covered. This practice, plus good organization and a high degree of literary skill (Dr. Schlesinger can *write*), make this book highly readable. Of particular interest is Dr. Schlesinger's discussion of philosopher John Locke's idea of presidential prerogative, of which I was previously unaware (and which I am still mulling over). This is the view that extraordinary national emergencies create temporary exceptions to normal constitutional restrictions on a president's power to act. This prerogative is supposed to come into play during clear threats to the republic that require immediate action and that are recognized by Congress and the people as legitimate emergencies; a president is also supposed to submit himself to the judgment of Congress (e.g., for possible impeachment) after exercising this prerogative, and not pretend that he had been acting within the Constitution (which might set a dangerous precedent). This idea is important because of its influence on the Founding Fathers, who were steeped in Locke, and because of its consequences. Correctly or not, President Abraham Lincoln invoked it during the Civil War, as did President Franklin Delano Roosevelt during World War II. President Richard M. Nixon also made use of it... with far less justification. Dr. Schlesinger's treatment of President Nixon, the size of whose index entry dwarfs that of any other topic in the book, is also fascinating. Dr. Schlesinger clearly is appalled by the man and devotes many pages to his schenanigans and his almost monarchical views of Presidential power. He demonstrates just how significant a departure was the Presidency under Nixon from the Presidency as conceived by the Founding Fathers. In a statement that is very true, Dr. Schlesinger calls Nixon's Presidency "a culmination, not an aberration, and potentially the best thing to have happened to the Presidency in a long time" (paraphrasing from memory, since I lost the page). It is unfortunate that Congress did not make the most of Watergate and put the Presidency into its proper place (e.g., see its shameful War Powers Act or the Presidency of Bill Clinton). This, Congress's own role in the expansion of Presidential power (its unwise, Cold War-inspired delegation of foreign policy discretion to the Presidency, its evasion of responsibility, its cowardice, etc.), is also given just and ample treatment. I am concerned about Dr. Schlesinger's possible biases. He discloses, for example, that he was an aide in President John F. Kennedy's administration, and indeed his view of Kennedy's Presidency is relatively rosey. He is also kind to President Roosevelt and must admire him, else he would not be a leading member of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute. And as David S. Wyman contends in his definitive history of America's response to the Holocaust, *The Abandonment of the Jews*, Dr. Schlesinger has long maintained (though it does not come up in this volume) that Roosevelt did all he could to save European Jews from the Nazis during World War II--in utter contradiction of the facts. My main criticism of *The Imperial Presidency* is theoretical. I am a strict constructionist, Dr. Schlesinger believes in a looser, evolutionary interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. He says as much in his first chapter. Quoting President Woodrow Wilson--that despot of democracy whose own collectivist impulses and subversion of the Constitution forced our American boys into the bloody trenches of a European war--he objects to the Constitution's being treated as "a mere legal document, to be read as a will or contract," and advocates that its meaning be determined "by the exigencies and the new aspects of life itself." I will state here simply that under this view of the Constitution, the document's meaning becomes anything anybody at any time wishes it to be--in which case it loses all utility, we might as well have no Constitution and kiss our individual rights goodbye to unscrupulous men and prevailing philosophies that might not, in fact, be in our best interest. We have the power of Amendment for a reason. I dare not speculate how Dr. Schlesinger's beliefs might have affected his scholarship. I will note with irony, however, that the constitutional views he expouses have greatly contributed to the "imperial presidency" he so decries. Was Nixon the chief culprit in Watergate--or was he the culmination of intellectuals like Dr. Schlesinger? Despite these criticisms, there is more good in *The Imperial Presidency* than bad. I will repeatedly refer back to it whenever I have questions about what powers our presidents have and how they got them. I might buy a more recent edition. Mine was published shortly after Watergate, the constitutional crisis that occasioned the book's writing, but according to Amazon.com's description of it, it is supposed to cover the Presidency through Ronald Reagan. My curiosity is piqued. 19 of 20 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Back and Improved...At Last!, October 28, 2004 By  G M. Stathis (cedar city, utah USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)       The year before George W. Bush took office as president I attended a professional conference where a graduate student offered a paper that posed the question whether Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s "Imperial Presidency" was still valid. Quite a debate ensued. Today, in the wake of the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war, and its application in Iraq, I am compelled to offer that this revised volume, with new introduction, answers the previous question with a resounding yea. This has been a very important volume in the study of the presidency, especially regarding the constitution, foreign policy, and war. In the shadow of the Iraqi affair, I would go one step further and say it is a vital work in these troubled times. No, the era of the Imperial Presidency never really went away; and yes, it is a vital concern for the future of the republic and global stability. Schlesinger has recognized this and once again warns us of pending dangers. 6 of 6 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Once again important, March 26, 2003 By  John Fix (Eastchester, NY USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)    This review is from: Imperial Presidency (Hardcover) Although this book focuses on Richard Nixon's abuse of Presidential power, it can apply to the present day as well. Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush have all extended the power of the Presidency in ways the framers of the Constitution would never have dreamed of. I agree with the reviewer who commented about the favoritism towards Kennedy and Roosevelt hence the four stars rather than five. A great read for anyone interested in the American Constitution as it relates to the powers of the President.		Ad feedback   Most Recent Customer Reviews 5.0 out of 5 stars Vintage Schlesenger Although this book was dated when I read it and is probably now considered a history book, I found it very enlighening and informative. Read more Published 14 months ago by Ronald D., Birch 5.0 out of 5 stars This is a great classical book We read this in college and it was one of the best books we ever saw on American politics and I read it again last week. Read more Published on May 23, 2007 by Orlando Citizen 5.0 out of 5 stars One of the great presidency books Does history repeat itself? Sure seems like it. Scary stuff. Published on February 14, 2007 by Jack Lechelt 4.0 out of 5 stars Schlesinger's most revolutionary book to date! Not Schlesinger's best work, however the Imperial Presidency may be his most revolutionary book to date. The book tended to be quite redundant and repetitive. Read more Published on January 15, 2003 by forchewzee 5.0 out of 5 stars Great examination of the power of the Presidency I used this book primarily for a study on the Presidency of Richard Nixon. Schlesinger presents infromation concisely and in highly enjoyable language. Read more Published on May 4, 2000 by Colin Walker Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews

---

Customer Discussions

This product's forum Discussion Replies Latest Post No discussions yet Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight Start a new discussion Topic: First post: Receive e-mail when new posts are made Prompts for sign-in   Guidelines Active discussions in related forums Discussion Replies Latest Post history Holocaust Denial Dissected 3287 1 minute ago politics As Obama Accelerates our Recovery from Bush, what are your partying strategies? 125 1 minute ago politics How can the Liberals grow our economy? 45 2 minutes ago politics Happy Veteran's Day to all the Vets on the board! 17 2 minutes ago history Most important drug user? Why? 9251 34 minutes ago american history What is the best comprehensive, authoritative book on American history (no textbooks please)? 2 23 hours ago american history Flaunt your Patriotism 15 1 day ago Search Customer Discussions Search all Amazon discussions

The History community Latest activity 2 minutes ago 21,921 customers have contributed 28,946 products, 804 discussions and more... › Explore the community The Politics community Latest activity 25 minutes ago 12,196 customers have contributed 9,532 products, 1,023 discussions and more... › Explore the community The American History community Latest activity 2 hours ago 9,068 customers have contributed 9,630 products, 757 lists & guides and more... › Explore the community Related forums american... (34 discussions) history (804 discussions) politics (1023 discussions) Explore more › See all Customer Communities › Your communities

---

Listmania!

Doing American History: Historiography, Theory, Methodology: A list by clio08723   Tunes to Washes Dishes To: A list by Jacob W. Day   Pulitzer Prize-Winning Presidential Biographies: A list by Christopher Nguyen "Chris Nguyen" Create a Listmania! list

Search Listmania!

---

So You'd Like to...

learn about Franklin D. Roosevelt: A guide by Mark Klobas   learn about Herbert Hoover: A guide by Mark Klobas   be spiffycool. like me. heh.: A guide by "xferinoc" Create a guide

Search Guides

---

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Be the first person to add an article about this item at Amapedia.com.

› See featured Amapedia.com articles

---

Look for Similar Items by Category

• Books > History > Americas > United States > 20th Century
• Books > Nonfiction > Politics > U.S.
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Political Science > United States

---

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:
History
History - U.S.
History: American
Government - Executive Branch
Government - U.S. Government
History / United States / 20th Century
United States - 20th Century
Executive power
Presidents
United States


i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Ad feedback

 

Feedback If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide? Your comments can help make our site better for everyone. Please note that we are unable to respond directly to all feedback submitted via this form, but we'll ask you to sign in so we can contact you if needed.

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

› View and edit your browsing history

Get to Know Us Careers Investor Relations Press Releases Amazon and Our Planet Make Money with Us Sell on Amazon Join Associates Self-publish with Us › See all Let Us Help You Shipping Rates & Policies Amazon Prime Returns Help

Canada | China | France | Germany | Japan | United Kingdom  And don't forget: Amazon Windowshop | AmazonWireless | Askville | Audible | DPReview | Endless | IMDb | Shopbop | SoundUnwound | Warehouse Deals by Amazon | Zappos Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice  © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates

Product Details

• Paperback: 624 pages
• Publisher: Mariner Books (August 12, 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0618420010
• ISBN-13: 978-0618420018
• Product Dimensions: 8.2 x 5.5 x 1.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #185,577 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

51 of 57 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant and important., December 25, 2000

By	Mike Baum (Anchorage, AK USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Imperial Presidency (Hardcover)

Whatever his shortcomings (see below), historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. has a great mind and writes with a silver pen. I am immensely impressed with his book on the growth of presidential power in America and cannot imagine a better introduction to my future studies on this important subject.

The book's organization is superb. Appropriately, it first discusses the Founding Fathers' likely intentions in regard to the Presidency and where they disagreed amongst themselves. Next it explains the Presidency and its war power, tracing its development through the nineteenth century and into the twentieth, and paying special attention to the Second World War, the Korean War and Vietnam. Most of a 64-page chapter is devoted to President Richard M. Nixon's radical ideas and practices. Democracy and foreign policy is then treated, followed by the Presidency and its powers of secrecy, and finally, the Presidency and its future. As these subjects are dealt with, many facts are thrown at the reader, the totality being hard to absorb. Fortunately, nothing is explained in isolation. The author constantly backtracks, providing new historical context and rehashing material already covered. This practice, plus good organization and a high degree of literary skill (Dr. Schlesinger can *write*), make this book highly readable.

Of particular interest is Dr. Schlesinger's discussion of philosopher John Locke's idea of presidential prerogative, of which I was previously unaware (and which I am still mulling over). This is the view that extraordinary national emergencies create temporary exceptions to normal constitutional restrictions on a president's power to act. This prerogative is supposed to come into play during clear threats to the republic that require immediate action and that are recognized by Congress and the people as legitimate emergencies; a president is also supposed to submit himself to the judgment of Congress (e.g., for possible impeachment) after exercising this prerogative, and not pretend that he had been acting within the Constitution (which might set a dangerous precedent). This idea is important because of its influence on the Founding Fathers, who were steeped in Locke, and because of its consequences. Correctly or not, President Abraham Lincoln invoked it during the Civil War, as did President Franklin Delano Roosevelt during World War II. President Richard M. Nixon also made use of it... with far less justification.

Dr. Schlesinger's treatment of President Nixon, the size of whose index entry dwarfs that of any other topic in the book, is also fascinating. Dr. Schlesinger clearly is appalled by the man and devotes many pages to his schenanigans and his almost monarchical views of Presidential power. He demonstrates just how significant a departure was the Presidency under Nixon from the Presidency as conceived by the Founding Fathers. In a statement that is very true, Dr. Schlesinger calls Nixon's Presidency "a culmination, not an aberration, and potentially the best thing to have happened to the Presidency in a long time" (paraphrasing from memory, since I lost the page). It is unfortunate that Congress did not make the most of Watergate and put the Presidency into its proper place (e.g., see its shameful War Powers Act or the Presidency of Bill Clinton). This, Congress's own role in the expansion of Presidential power (its unwise, Cold War-inspired delegation of foreign policy discretion to the Presidency, its evasion of responsibility, its cowardice, etc.), is also given just and ample treatment.

I am concerned about Dr. Schlesinger's possible biases. He discloses, for example, that he was an aide in President John F. Kennedy's administration, and indeed his view of Kennedy's Presidency is relatively rosey. He is also kind to President Roosevelt and must admire him, else he would not be a leading member of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute. And as David S. Wyman contends in his definitive history of America's response to the Holocaust, *The Abandonment of the Jews*, Dr. Schlesinger has long maintained (though it does not come up in this volume) that Roosevelt did all he could to save European Jews from the Nazis during World War II--in utter contradiction of the facts.

My main criticism of *The Imperial Presidency* is theoretical. I am a strict constructionist, Dr. Schlesinger believes in a looser, evolutionary interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. He says as much in his first chapter. Quoting President Woodrow Wilson--that despot of democracy whose own collectivist impulses and subversion of the Constitution forced our American boys into the bloody trenches of a European war--he objects to the Constitution's being treated as "a mere legal document, to be read as a will or contract," and advocates that its meaning be determined "by the exigencies and the new aspects of life itself." I will state here simply that under this view of the Constitution, the document's meaning becomes anything anybody at any time wishes it to be--in which case it loses all utility, we might as well have no Constitution and kiss our individual rights goodbye to unscrupulous men and prevailing philosophies that might not, in fact, be in our best interest. We have the power of Amendment for a reason. I dare not speculate how Dr. Schlesinger's beliefs might have affected his scholarship. I will note with irony, however, that the constitutional views he expouses have greatly contributed to the "imperial presidency" he so decries. Was Nixon the chief culprit in Watergate--or was he the culmination of intellectuals like Dr. Schlesinger?

Despite these criticisms, there is more good in *The Imperial Presidency* than bad. I will repeatedly refer back to it whenever I have questions about what powers our presidents have and how they got them. I might buy a more recent edition. Mine was published shortly after Watergate, the constitutional crisis that occasioned the book's writing, but according to Amazon.com's description of it, it is supposed to cover the Presidency through Ronald Reagan. My curiosity is piqued.

19 of 20 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Back and Improved...At Last!, October 28, 2004

By	G M. Stathis (cedar city, utah USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

The year before George W. Bush took office as president I attended a professional conference where a graduate student offered a paper that posed the question whether Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s "Imperial Presidency" was still valid. Quite a debate ensued. Today, in the wake of the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war, and its application in Iraq, I am compelled to offer that this revised volume, with new introduction, answers the previous question with a resounding yea. This has been a very important volume in the study of the presidency, especially regarding the constitution, foreign policy, and war. In the shadow of the Iraqi affair, I would go one step further and say it is a vital work in these troubled times. No, the era of the Imperial Presidency never really went away; and yes, it is a vital concern for the future of the republic and global stability. Schlesinger has recognized this and once again warns us of pending dangers.

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Once again important, March 26, 2003

By	John Fix (Eastchester, NY USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Imperial Presidency (Hardcover)

Although this book focuses on Richard Nixon's abuse of Presidential power, it can apply to the present day as well. Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush have all extended the power of the Presidency in ways the framers of the Constitution would never have dreamed of. I agree with the reviewer who commented about the favoritism towards Kennedy and Roosevelt hence the four stars rather than five. A great read for anyone interested in the American Constitution as it relates to the powers of the President.