Heretics: The Other Side of Early Christianity (Hardcover)

~ Gerd Ludemann (Author), John Bowden (Translator) "The history of primitive Christianity sets out to depict the historical course of the first two Christian centuries, or, more precisely, it deals with the..." (more)
Key Phrases: church historiography, earliest community, New Testament, Old Testament, Jewish Christians (more...)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

Ludemann's critical examination of "holy scripture and its authority" is a meticulous historical investigation of early Christianity that seeks "to direct attention once again to Jesus." General readers may find the extensive documentation intimidating; but the argument is accessible, and the documentation is tucked away in notes. Beginning with Lessing's insight that the New Testament was a work of the Catholic Church and Lessing's claim that we may draw our own conclusions about Jesus, Ludemann sets about to welcome the heretics of primitive Christianity back into the Christian community as valuable human witnesses to the human Jesus. A heretic is one who makes a choice, and Ludemann notes that this was done on all sides in the processes of canonization by which the New Testament was formed, just as it must be done by contemporary Christians who would draw conclusions for the present from historical reconstructions. No doubt, some readers will be put off by Ludemann's assertion that the Bible is the word of human beings, not the word of God. Steve Schroeder

Review

In Heretics, Gerd Ludemann argues that the time from the first Christian communities to the end of the second century was not a period of great harmony, but was defined by the struggles of various Christian groups for doctrinal authority. Drawing on a wealth of data, Ludemann asserts that the losers in the struggle actually represented Christianity in its more authentic, original form. Since Orthodoxy has been defined by the victors in this struggle, it is the silenced alternative views that have been labeled "heretical". Ludemann's findings are important as well as liberating for understanding both Christianity and the Bible. Readers will gain a new understanding of Jesus and the early church from this compelling and controversial book. Heretics is a model of historical scholarship and theological investigation. Indeed, the first recorded clash and conflict over doctrinal propriety took place in the Jerusalem Christian community when Paul sought a cessation of the practice of circumcision and the abolition of certain dietary prohibitions. The subsequent debates regarding the nature of God, the definition of what would be come reliable scripture, the theology and doctrines of Christianity would rage around the rim of the Mediterranean and result in schism, conflict, commissions, and conferences. Heretics is the informative history of those fascinating times. -- Midwest Book Review

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 335 pages
• Publisher: Westminster John Knox Press (August 1996)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0664220851
• ISBN-13: 978-0664220853
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.3 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #659,165 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

37 of 39 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Challenging, Thought Provoking, yet still somehow Comforting, August 13, 2000

By	Bernhard W. Hoff "benhoff" (NJ United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Ludemann's main point appears to be that ALL Christians in the first century or so after Jesus were regarded as heretics by one or another group of their fellow Christians. Everyone, it seems, had their turn at being orthodox or heretical, even the original Jewish Christians and St. Paul himself. Ludemann convincingly illustrates these conflicts from the New Testament and other first and second century texts, most of which still are embraced as orthodox today (e.g. the Apostles' Creed, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Justin Martyr). But Ludemann goes beyond the mere fact of factions within the early church to consider why, and what it all might mean, even to us today.

Ludemann locates the source of the problem in the natural human response to Jesus' ministry and subsequent death. Jesus "lived out for his disciples the message of the boundless love and grace of God - in words and actions" to quote from this book. This love and grace is available to the poor, the outcast and the lost even without temple sacrifices and ritual observances. His message was also apocalyptic, that the kingdom of God (including the physical resurrection of the dead - a widely held belief in Judaism at the time) was at hand. Unlike other apocalyptic messages, He also taught that we humans can live the Kingdom of God now before it actually comes. This message of living the Kingdom of God attracted a wide and fervent following of believers who then tried to make sense of Jesus' death in light of his radical and apocalyptic message and eventually in light of the fact that the Kingdom did not come. The various "heretics" and indeed the emerging Catholic orthodoxy itself, each understood more fully different parts of Jesus' message and accordingly so emphasized them in their doctrines. Ludemann wonders if the whole notion of "heretic" is outmoded and whether those earlier outcasts should be "welcomed back into the fold" as contributors to the development of Christian belief.

What I personally find most interesting about this book is Ludemann's discussion of how the books of the New Testament were selected, and in some cases even written at all, largely due to "heretics". So it appears that II Thessalonians was a later anonymous re-write of St. Paul's genuine I Thessalonians to "correct" its' heretical implications, and in fact was meant to replace it rather than stand beside it. Ephesians and Colossians likewise seem to have been written by Gnostic inclined followers of St. Paul rather than Paul himself. The various "spins" in each of the four gospels are also mentioned as examples of the variety of belief in the various Christian communities. Ludemann with his modern sensibilities struggles with the notion of honest, earnest believers dealing in "forgeries". I do not understand it fully either, but from my own reading (see Fowden's "The Egyptian Hermes" and Doresse's "The Secret Books of the Egyptian Gnostics", both also reviewed by me) it seems that this was a common feature of sacred writings in antiquity. As for selection rather than authorship, the "heretic" Marcion was the first to assemble a Christian body of sacred books (Luke, Acts, and seven of Paul's epistles). Until then most Christians were concerned with statements of belief (e.g. the Roman, or Apostles' Creed) rather than scripture, strange as that may seem to us today.

This book challenged me with new thoughts and opened new understanding for me. In some places I was alarmed and disturbed, in others excited and strangely comforted. The brief epilogue "Ten Golden Words" is worth the price of the book all by itself and should be re-read every day by those who would seek God through the study of Scriptures. I highly recommend this book, despite its' sometimes ponderous prose. (It was translated from academic German, after all).

28 of 35 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Heretics show the 'other' truth of Jesus, January 23, 1998

By A Customer

If history is written by the victors, then it makes sense that the losers would have a different - though equally valid - viewpoint. "Heretics" provides just this view of the man we call Jesus. After 2000 years you wouldn't think there was much new that could be said on the subject - Gerd Ludemann has proved this wrong! Like the equally contentious, yet inspiring, "The Autobiography of Jesus of Nazareth and the Missing years" by Richard G. Patton, this book does sound true! It does make sense that there would be this power struggle as each of the different 'Christian' Church's wanted their definition of Jesus to be the 'official' version. This book will make you question, but ultimately reaffirm your belief in the Man from Nazareth. Excellent reading.

6 of 62 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Question of fact, February 26, 1999

By A Customer

How can we view findings about Jesus of Nazareth when there was no Nazareth at the time of Jesus. My readings conclusively tell me that Nazareth came into existance well after the time of Christ.