Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
36 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating mess, December 30, 2001
The real proof of this book's quality is that it would still be an absorbing and uncommonly well-written memoir of a seriously screwed-up childhood even if no one had ever heard of J.D. Salinger. Of course, it would never have been published either, so let's get down to brass tacks. As an "expose" of The Creep Behind The Artist, the prosecution is scattershot (there's a wearisomely prolonged and ultimately unconvincing effort to define him as an actual cult leader of sorts) but eventually sways the jury. And unlike the unsympathetic Joyce Maynard, who managed to cash in with her story first, Margaret Salinger seems to me fully entitled to whatever degree of payback this book represents. (It's not a hatchet job but she's not afraid to let hard-earned bitterness show at times.) When, as a teenager, she finally begins to see his toxicity as a parent and writes in her diary, ...it's a real stand-up-and-cheer moment.However, it must be acknowledged that the book is in desperate need of strong editing. The indiscriminate inclusiveness (i.e. the complete text of notes passed in junior high school) and irritatingly pointless footnotes (i.e. explaining where the chapter heading "To Sir With Love" comes from) are unfortunate deterrents to appreciating this book on its considerable merits.
|
|
|
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Digressive but Fascinating Book, November 25, 2000
I bought this book to learn more about one of my favorite authors, JDS, and the book starts out like a biography of the man, sure enough. It's even a bit overly scholarly at first (footnotes, analysis of Jewish life in America, etc.) and I thought it was going to turn into a tedious read... But the book changes form several times as Peggy excorcises her demons and finds new reasons to keep writing it. You might have heard some of the debate of the ethics of writing this book while her old man is still alive. But, ultimately this book is about Peggy Salinger and not about JD. She is a troubled, deeply scarred woman who finally makes peace with herself and her father through the writing of this book, and that cathartic process unfolds beautifully as you read.
|
|
|
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
It's Only a Memoir, February 26, 2005
Where's the editing in this book? While a memoir, by definition, presents facts (or not!) filtered through the author's memory, bias and interpretation, an editor or reviewer should still reflect upon the writing skills and organization offered to the reader. Unfortunately, Ms. Salinger offered the minutiae of her personal and family history in a way that was to the point in describing her tortured childhood, but often tediously anecdotal, and quite often ambiguous (did her mother beat her or was Peggy's memory lapse just that? Was Peggy clairvoyant? Was she her brother's protector or did she hate him initially as suggested by her father's comment?). Overall, the book suffers from a lack of structure and too many writing approaches - sometimes comic slang, sometimes well-written philosophical interpretation. It would be difficult to sum up Ms. Salinger's overall personal writing style. She almost sadly seems to attempt to copy her father's style at times. Her best approach, to me, is in the final section where she seems to combine both directness with deep, creative insight into her past and the characters inhabiting it.
Those looking for details of J. D.'s life and motivation should not expect to rely upon this memoir for facts. Either this accounting by Ms. Salinger was mis-advertised as such or, in my opinion, missed it's mark. The book is about Margaret Salinger, not J.D., and, as such, presents her journey from a perceived troubled childhood, through the not-so-unique emotional upheaval of adolescence - popularity, note-passing, boyfriends, some miserable teachers and loneliness (a la Holden Caulfield?), serious emotional and physical disabilities, to a final level of personal peace and acceptance of the fact that she apparently had miserable parents.
References to J.D. Salinger's writing were most often inserted into multitudes of footnotes, interrupting what written flow there was, but were haphazardly left in the text in other instances for no distinguishable reason. An ambitious initial and insightful attempt to relate Mr. Salinger's life's events to his motivation seemed to dwindle away as the memoir continued. Disappointment over this tactic arises not so much from the loss of interpretation but to the overall lack of focus and structure.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|