|
|
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Worst Book Ever Set in Venice, August 9, 2002
By A Customer
Henry James said something to the effect that everything that can be said about Venice already has been. Unfortunately, that didn't stop Paula Weideger. This is undoubtedly the worst book set in Venice I have ever read or hope to read. "Set in," Venice, not "about" it: the only thing this book is about is its monumentally unappealing author. Previous reviewers have adequately described the persona Paula Weideger presents here-a spiteful, self-obsessed, incapable whiner who drags her mysteriously complaisant husband halfway across Europe essentially on a whim, who, in spite of her pride in her research about the city, is continually surprised by facts available in any decent guidebook (it takes three trips before she even notices that there is something bizarre about the Venetian address numbering system), who wastes her readers' time with an account of her computer tribulations, and who doesn't have a good word to say about anybody.Is there anything good to say about her? Early on, it's possible to entertain the idea that Weideger is up to something clever. Just as "Paul Theroux," the disagreeable first-person narrator of Paul Theroux's books, is a fictional character related to Paul Theroux but not identical to him, perhaps Weideger has created an even more disagreeable character called "Paula Weideger," to breathe some fresh, ironic life into the I-found-paradise-in-Italy genre. Not a chance. Theroux's game requires conscious craft and some authorial distance from the persona. Weideger has neither: her writing is so unselfconscious it's confessional. That's why reviewers have reacted so strongly to her as a person: instead of writing about Venice she's committed one extended act of unintentional self-revelation. It's like a blog between hard covers. But wait, there's more. No previous reviewer has remarked on the real problem with this book-the sheer incompetence of the writing. I don't mean that the sentences are badly put together; for the most part they aren't. But that's journalism. A travel memoir calls for the tools of fiction-observation and curiosity. Weideger has neither. She seems to think that the way to tell you what something is like is to pile up physical descriptions, rather than selecting the details that convey significance. Naturally, this external style fails miserably when it comes to describing people. Weideger doesn't even seem to realize that it's possible to characterize people in terms of their beliefs and motives rather than their clothes. There's no better example than Weideger's husband, who's so undercharacterized we never even know why he accompanied her to Venice when he assertedly really didn't want to. Possibly worst of all, Weideger has no sense of humor whatsoever (an earlier reviewer's remark to the contrary was dipped in sarcasm). To give her her due, like a stopped clock she can't help but have the occasional insight. The church of the Gesuiti, across the canal from where she lived, is every bit the neglected marvel she says it is (it's still living down the bad rap it got from William Dean Howells in the nineteenth century). And Carnevale, commercial though it is, is vivid enough to bring her prose briefly into something like life. But do yourself a favor. Don't waste your time or money on this book. Read Jan Morris, or Martin Garrett, or Paolo Barbaro, or any decent guidebook instead. Better yet, go to Venice and see what Weideger missed.
|