Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
23 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An outstanding piece of research, September 20, 2000
Snowden is not an Afro-centric writer, he is a well qualified professor of classics, an accredited expert in his field."Blacks in Antiquity" presents a comprehensive history and analysis of ancient Ethiopian "black" culture. In the 18th and 19th centuries, some American anthropologists and theologians have attempted to rewrite Ethiopian history to show this advanced culture as one not truly black. The roots of that go into the very heart of the origin of western racism in Colonial America and can be found to affect our implicit views of race even today. Snowden shows from historical, textual and archaeological evidence that the Ethiopians were indeed a "black" race. He also establishes their position of respect and complete equal acceptance with other ancient cultures of the time. In essence, it shows, while perhaps not explicitly stating it, that racism is a much more recent invention than many have supposed-- especially those hold to a "Black curse" or "inferiority" theory in physiology or theology. If you want a volume that presents evidence in a straight foward and empirically supportable manner, this is an excellent choice.
|
|
|
20 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A well-written discussion of Greek-African contact, January 29, 1998
Snowden seems to really know what he's talking about. To someone as ignorant in the subject as I was, it was a great read to learn all about the contact between the ancient Africans and Greeks. The pictures and explanations of artifacts are especially interesting.
|
|
|
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Some Rays of Valuable Information Still Shining Through Layers of Dust, April 19, 2007
Frank M. Snowden, Jr. draws a thorough picture of the absence of racism in the ancient Greek and Roman cultures. He is analysing ancient texts, archaeological evidence (paintings, sculptures), encounters of war, integration in mythology and the participation in the theater and amphitheater of Blacks from the white Greek and Roman perspective. Closing with theory and practise of living together without prejudice in pre- and early Christian Classic Mediterranean civilisation. He reveals the irony that the Greeks and Romans if at all, then harbored some prejudices not against black skinned, but the even whiter north Europeans beyond their borders. Anybody who is interested in all of the above will find this book rewarding.
However, elapsed time (written in 1969) has caused this work to suffer immensely, not only exemplified by the use of the N-word and also "Ethiopian" not exclusively for the people inhabiting today's country area of that name, but Blacks in general. Which occasionally becomes awkward, when the context does not make it clear, which "king of the Ethiopians" the book is referencing: From Axum (today's Ethiopia), any given black kingdom or especially Nubia (today's Sudan). Most names of peoples and kingdoms are not in use today anymore and Snowden doesn't always reveal, whom he is referring to in general modern terminology. No maps are provided for easy clarification.
Intended as passionately anti-racist, by today's standard, this book unintentionally harbors a lot of racism, not only in the vocabulary:
Snowden avers, only retardet kids would not be afraid of the other skin color. That has been disproven. Kids in kindergarten do not fear kids of other skin colors. (His contrary statements concern with lacking selectiveness fear of adult males, which is no less untrue.) In fact, human toddlers till a certain age are programmed by nature to accept almost any given mammal population as normal companions, being able to differentiate every individual monkey, what older kids/adults can't do anymore.
The book constantly describes paintings and sculptures, with no exception commenting black bodies and faces with vocabulary either sounding like medical conditions or in the tune of "flat-nosed, puffy-lipped" etc. Reading that many hundreds of times, Snowden thereby establishes respective synapse connections in the reader's brain. He never describes white skinned as something like "squeezed-out-nosed, inflated-lipped" etc., in fact, he doesn't describe white folks at all. Which makes white the norm of humanity and blacks the deviation. Whereas in reality it is the other way around (if at all, of course), as white people are nothing else but paled blacks, i.e. black would be the human norm, with all other phenotypes deriving from that.
The perspective is white. Antiquity's norm is Greece and Rome. Not Egypt, Phoenicians, Ethiopia, Sumer, etc. The mingling is not told from the latter's viewpoints.
Even worse, most of the above are not considered to be black. In the meantime we know that all of the above and many more peoples in the ancient vicinity were black peoples. This is a mayor flaw of the book as for one thing, the meeting of black and white(r) cultures leaves out considerable, even the most important portions of the book's potential subject matter. For another, one of the important reasons for the lack of racism is missed: The infant by comparison Greek and Roman civilisations knew Egypt, Sumer and other more ancient cultures as role models, which have been faked/mistaken into white in the meanwhile. (Which explains the prejudice towards the back then "under-developed" northern European cultures.) Moses and other historical personalities still appear to be white in this book.
Also in its style, the book shows signs of ageing. The occasionally integrated ancient Greek vocabulary isn't translated, not even transscribed into the Latin alphabet and thus become unreadable for most readers. This intellectual arrogance has been dropped in the 1990s. I mean, really: 82 notes pages for 150 normal text pages (+ 100 picture pages), but these most essential transscriptions are not provided! Speaking of foot notes: It may happen that a foot note is longer than 2 pages and includes references back to the previous parts, to several pages of both of the two picture sections. As if that wouldn't be enough, the picture references within the normal text may be many dozen pages in advance, without giving the page numbers (but the picture numbers; in combination with foot notes). This is the epitomy of obstacle reading I have had to deal with in my lifetime yet.
Clearly, this book is to be venerated as pushing the envelope once. Now we are in dire need of a completely new book on the subject as even a potential extensive preface and some changes wouldn't be enough to adjust it to the times.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|