From Publishers Weekly
An astrophysicist on the senior staff of NASA's Space Telescope Science Institute team, Chaisson was centrally involved in the extensive testing and deploying of the Hubble Space Telescope, which was launched in 1990. The orbiting observatory, designed to measure distance in deep space with great precision, was the subject of bickering and power-juggling among government agencies, academic astronomers and project engineers. Chaisson, who kept a log of his own work with this profoundly complex, nearly 20-year-long project, offers an observant account of the development and difficulties attached to Hubble's progress, including the problems related to its early orbiting and the flaws discovered in its crucial 94.5-inch primary mirror. Careful to protect related military-intelligence secrets and teasing readers with allusions to the military's large, and largely deleterious, role in the project, Chaisson mitigates the expose aspect of his report. Amateur astronomers, however, will surely reflect the same glee Chaisson demonstrates as they follow his abundantly illustrated chronicle of this "Big Science" effort.
Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Library Journal
When launched in April 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope was billed by NASA as able to "see beyond the edge of the universe." The hype quickly turned into bureaucratic stonewalling when the telescope began showing various engineering flaws. To Chaisson, director of educational programs for the Telescope Science Institute and an unabashed Hubble enthusiast, NASA's posturing and mismanagement were not only administratively unsound, they were just plain bad science. In this insider's account, he lashes out against many key entities (the press, the project subcontractors and engineers, and certain egotistical scientists), but his most biting criticism is reserved for NASA. Chaisson shows how, public perceptions to the contrary, even the hobbled Hubble has produced valuable images. Unfortunately, parts of his book plod with a glut of detail and semitechnical material that can lose many readers. Despite its literary imperfections, this book is a good chronicle of the Hubble episode and how "Big Science" can become counterproductive. For larger public and undergraduate libraries.
- Gregg Sapp, Montana State Univ. Libs., BozemanCopyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
See all Editorial Reviews