|
29 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is the nuts!, October 16, 2003
I've been playing "Thursday Night Poker" for 20 years, and I've read a lot of poker books--and won a lot of money as the result--but none of those books have been especially good, and most have been downright terrible. This is the first all round excellent book on the subject I've found.The author avoids those problems I have with the majority of poker books on the market. First, he writes exceedingly well, a rarity among poker writers. The book is intelligent, readable and interesting. There are no wide page margins and large print. There is a lot of material. He sticks to the point. He's not a windbag, off the subject, boasting about his individual accomplishments, another common poker writer problem. Second, he writes with the Thursday night game or the low-to-medium-level casino game in mind, understanding that you want to stay in longer than you should because you are playing to have fun and dropping every hand, sitting around waiting for the nuts, isn't how you want to spend Thursday night. He writes about playing with sophisticated players, tight games and when bluffing can be effective. Third--he covers the games you're likely to encounter, emphasizing 7-Card Stud, High-Low, Holdem and Omaha and covering, but de-emphasizing Draw and Five Card Stud. He covers, for example, how to play High-Low declare and "cards speak." He covers the differences between no-limit and limit. He offers practice examples to be sure you understand his points. Fourth--He's a mathematician who writes clearly and provides the corrrect amount of text covering odds, pot odds and making seat of the pants calculations while at the table. He provides clear tables, and explains what you should expect to have in each game to win. Fifth--and this is huge--He tells you exactly what to stay with to see the flop and 4th street in Holdem or 4th and 5th street in 7-Card Stud (given seven players at the table). He provides easy to remember general rules such as not chasing a higher pair, the dangers of coming in second best, not chasing a flush to the River. My one small complaint is that he uses seven stereotypical poker players as examples from tight to "a calling station" to make his points. Game situations are more complex that that. I would have preferred instead discussion on how to play the tight game, how to play the loose game with more emphasis on position. Even the tightest players sometimes bluff or go on "tilt." Or how to mislead with your betting pattern over the course of twenty hands. He also might have discussed wild cards, which many players encounter, even if only to state that they dumb down the game--you get out if you don't have any, and stay (and raise) if you do. This is not a book for an advanced player, and it is not the book for large stakes for he assumes that you play to have fun. For most of us, this is the book.
|