Star-Spangled Men: America's Ten Worst Presidents (Paperback)

by Nathan Miller (Author) "On New Year's Eve, 1977, as Jimmy Carter's first year in the White House was ending, the president was in Teheran, the guest of honor..." (more)
Key Phrases: worst presidents, White House, United States, New York (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review
In Star-Spangled Men, presidential biographer Nathan Miller compiles a subjective list of the 10 crummiest presidents in history. His criteria for ignominy: "bad character, the inability to compromise, a lack of vision, poor political skills, dishonesty, and an inability to communicate." Richard Nixon and Andrew Johnson are obvious choices, Jimmy Carter and William Howard Taft somewhat less so, though probably deserving according to Miller. Many readers probably can find a selection or two to quarrel with on these pages (Is Calvin Coolidge really one of the 10 worst?), but nonetheless will appreciate Miller's candid assessments. (The most controversial part of the book is certainly its brief epilogue, which details "the two most overrated presidents": Thomas Jefferson and John F. Kennedy.) Miller provides 10 neat summaries of 10 arguable failures in this good bit of opinionated writing that turns the klieg lights on some of American history's dimmer stars. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Publishers Weekly
Combining brief biographical profiles with scathing critiques, this one-man's rogues' gallery offers up Miller's (The Roosevelt Chronicles) opinions on who he considers to be the least successful American presidents. The trenchant though often superficial nature of this account is first revealed in the table of contents, where Miller lambastes William Howard Taft for being so fat he got stuck in a White House bathtub and characterizes Benjamin Harrison as looking like a "medieval gnome" with a handshake like a "wilted petunia," as if these qualities affected leadership. In an epilogue, he deflates two more presidents as the "most overrated"?John F. Kennedy, whom he calls a "confirmed cold warrior" (wasn't virtually everyone in those days?), and Thomas Jefferson, whom he accuses of wrecking the nation's economy and leading the country to war with Britain through the Embargo Act of 1807. Miller writes with passion in this irreverent broadside, where opinion tends to overstep analysis.
Copyright 1998 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 272 pages
• Publisher: Scribner (February 25, 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0684852063
• ISBN-13: 978-0684852065
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.6 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 8.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (24 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #349,582 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Nonpartisan Hit Piece, March 2, 2000

By	Joel M Sax (Trabuco Canyon, CA USA) - See all my reviews

In an age of ultra-partisan hit pieces, this thoughtful and factual account is refreshing. You may not agree with Nathan Miller's choices of the ten worst presidents, but I believe you will find this a very readable and intelligent critique of ten different men who have attempted to lead the country. Though I remain one of those who felt last year's whole impeachment sideshow was a waste of precious tax dollars, I have to admit that I had to agree with much of what Miller has to say about Clinton's character. (Our current president is not on the list, though Miller has reserved the right to include him in future editions.) He also makes excellent cases against presidents who have been revered, such as Andrew Johnson who faced impeachment in 1868 for his undermining of Reconstruction. Calvin Coolidge is pilloried for refusing to forgive the debts of our Great War allies and, indirectly, contributing to the rise of Adolf Hitler. Some of the choices are predictable (such as Richard Nixon), but others like Jimmy Carter may (or may not) surprise you. Miller doesn't pick on people for party or ideology: he seeks instead to define for each man what exactly it was that made him so bad for the country. Those who are picking our nation's leaders this year should review this book before selecting from the candidates.

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Why Not....The Worst? (Presidents, that is), November 19, 2003

By	W. C HALL (Newport, OR USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Star Spangled Men: Americas Ten Worst Presidents (Hardcover)

Modesty is rarely a politician's strong suit. When he sought his country's highest office in 1976, former Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter titled his campaign memoir "Why Not The Best?" The former president, no doubt, would not be happy to find himself included in this far less flattering work. In this witty and informative volume, author Nathan Miller focuses on Carter and nine other chief executives who he rates as the worst presidents in our history.

Some of his choices--Andrew Johnson, U.S. Grant, Warren Harding, Benjamin Harrison, Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan--are pretty much consensus picks. The inclusion of Carter and Richard Nixon will no doubt stir the ire of their partisans. And putting Calvin Coolidge and William Howard Taft on the "ten worst" list is definitely debatable. But that's part of the fun of this book. Miller writes with an obvious delight for his subject matter. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, you will have to concede he lays out his arguments with a definite sense of conviction. Perhaps the greatest prospect for debate will be the epilogue, in which he argues that Thomas Jefferson and John Kennedy are our two most overrated chief executives.

Although these tales of incompetence, corruption and failure might seem disheartening after a while, there's one positive thought the reader is left with when it's all over....we've survived this bunch, so we're likely to survive a few more turkeys!--William C. Hall

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars America's Worst: A Useful Object Lesson, March 11, 1998

By	Randolph Marcus (Rockville, MD United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Star Spangled Men: Americas Ten Worst Presidents (Hardcover)

Miller has given us a valuable history lesson whose readership should include every candidate or potential candidate for the presidency. Although Bill Clinton is not considered for this book, will he become a "Starr (sic) Spangled Man?" This chapter is yet to be written.

In any event, the portraits of our White House schemers, wusses, and do-nothings are well sketched out, although I would have preferred more depth on the great "worst" -- U.S. Grant and Richard Nixon. The analysis seems a bit thin on these men, both of whom had such rich and and extraordinary pre-presidential careers. The chapter on overrated presidents, Thomas Jefferson and JFK was on the mark, althogh here, too, deeper analysis would have been welcome. I would quarrel with MIller on one major point. In his table of contents, he lists the 10 worst presidents in order from poor to horrid. If one regards the actual harm a president did to the country, I would rank order the final four as follows: Harding, Pierce, Nixon, and Buchanan. Buchanan was the very worst because he did not even attempt to halt the drift to the bloodiest period in American history. Nixon was bad enough, but his resignation prevented him from doing more harm; give him credit at least for not prolonging the agony and departing the scene voluntarily. For us history buffs, Miller should now try a new arcane theme. How about America's best Secretaries of Commerce?