Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a missed chance to write a really good book on this topic, April 20, 2001
I read this book because the subject matter really intrigued me - 14th century France, the Inquisition, The Goddess versus Christianity. The book tells the story of Marie Sybille, a poor immigrant's daughter, whose destination it is to become a reincarnatin of The Goddess, and of Luc de la Rose, the son of a nobel man, who is destined to become the lover of the Goddess, and both together will have to save their ancient people from the Enemy. (what the ancient people is exactly is never explained, unfortunately) There are interesting facts (and fictions) about life in the 14th century, about the church and the Inquisition, but mostly not told with convincing detail, the scene doesn't really spring to life before your eyes. What is even less convincing are the accounts of the Goddess cult which remain too vague and fantasy-like to really inspire the reader. The twist of the plot towards the end makes interesting reading but if the author had taken care to make her characters more human and less black&white it could have been even more interesting. But when the good guys are always beautiful, tall, noble and trust-inspiring and the bad guys ugly, fat, mean-looking or otherwise dislikable, it becomes easy to guess what will happen next. In my opinion this could have become a really good book if the author had spent some more time and effort researching the background and making the book a bit more substantial. A story like that lives from the details, not from the plot. If the subject matter interests you I would recommend to read The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer-Bradley, which is far better told than this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Intriguing narrative, but weak climax, October 30, 2005
Whether this book is framed as “fiction” or “historical fiction” became important to me. I am not referring to the magic; Kalogridis assumes a world in which magic is real, and as readers we have to accept that. If you aren’t willing to suspend disbelief, you simply should not read this book (or any other book with a fantasy or science fiction element).
What I am referring to is the characterization of the Catholic Church. The idea of magic-practitioners masquerading their devotion under the guise of the Church is intriguing, and finds its real-life embodiment in syncretistic religions such as Santeria and Voodoo. However, details of the operations of the Church, and how religious officials of the time would have thought & acted, just don’t jive with the historical record. Maybe it is just me, but being somewhat familiar with the period & the Church, I found a lot of what they did in the book hard to swallow. Maybe this wouldn’t have been such a problem if the bookstore hadn’t sold me the book as “historical fiction”.
The narrative is characterized by frequent interruptions & temporal shifts. I would say you need to be prepared to read this book over a short period of time... otherwise it would seem easy enough to get confused. That being said, I don’t think this is really a defect in the narrative—in fact, it is essential to it. In my opinion the narrative was only really deficient in that the climax was too wimpy, and the resolution too brief. Without revealing too much, we’re supposed to get a sense of impending doom—but events earlier in the book clearly establish that we shouldn’t really feel a sense of doom over what we’re expecting. This relieves much of the dramatic tension, depriving the climax of its bite.
That being said, this isn’t a bad book. The concept is intriguing, the writing is good, and the background & setting are very good. But for the weak climax, I would have given it 4 stars.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Strange book, but intesting indeed, November 11, 2005
The Burning Times is a pretty odd little book. The main character Abbess Marie Franchise, whose secular name is Sybille, is about to be put on trial for heresy and attacking the Pope (something that's never explained in the book.) At the start of the book she is offered the chance to confess to two Dominican monks, one of whom, Michael, subscribes to the popular peasant belief that Sybille is a saint with healing powers. None of this, of course Michael knows, will affect the inevitable guilty outcome of her trial and subsequent being burned alive.
From the start Sybille refuses to admit any guilt, but says she will confess, to Michael only. The other monk, father Charles, doesn't want his young scribe to do this because he feels the temptations of the young and comely Sybille will be too much. But he is stricken ill and Michael goes to take Sybille's confession.
And that's what most of the rest of this book is: Sybille confession to Michael the monk. Because it's told as a narrative instead of the normal third person omniscient voice of novels a lot is left out that could have been included, so parts of this book feel sparse. But over all, the author pulls it off.
I do have to say that all refrences to magic and paganisum in this book made it feel like a fantasy novel. I know some authors who can pull of real pagen themes in historical fiction and not have it be sci-fi ish, but this isn't one of them.
I found the ending of the book to be very strange and not at all believable, but it did intrigue me and I may read it again to see it comes off as more plausible.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|