|
27 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Right...then wrong...now right again (sort of), December 31, 2002
I'll start off with the caveat that I believe David Halberstam is America's finest living writer. "The Reckoning" ranks in the middle-tier of Halberstam's body of work, only because it hasn't aged as well as a classic like "The Best and the Brightest." Halberstam's 'big concept' here is as follows: Beginning of car industry: Ford (and U.S.) - Good! Nissan (and Japan) - Flat on their backs or making scooters, lawnmowers, surviving WWII, etc. ----- In the 50s and 60s: Ford / US - Good! (but overconfident, cocky, arrogant) Nissan (then Datsun) / Japan - Bad (making cars on equivalence with cheap transitor radios) ----- By mid-80s (the book was published in 86): Ford (as proxy for US economic model) - Bad! (Hubris brings great fall, etc.) Nissan (as proxy for Japanese economic model) - Good! (Height of Japanese bubble economy and 'The Japan that Can Say No') ----- By mid-90s (Book starts to look very dated): Ford - Ascendant! (tenures of Red Poling, Alex Trotman put Ford back on top) Nissan - Collapsed! (popping of Japanese bubble economy; Nissan loses touch with consumers, bleeds red ink) ----- 2002 (Book regains its relevancy): Ford (as proxy for US) - Punch-drunk fighter stumbling around taking an eight-count after brain-dead Jacque Nasser era Nissan (as proxy for Japan) - Firing on all cylinders worldwide thanks to amazing leadership of Carlos Ghosn ----- It is worth noting that contrary to Halberstam's premise, Nissan is succeeding *despite* the Japanese model, not because of it. [Ghosn's real success has been his attack against long-held Japanese core principles such as guaranteed lifetime employment.] What would be great would be a re-release of 'The Reckoning' with about a 75- to 100-page update by Halberstam bringing the events of the last 16 years into focus vis-a-vis the original premise of his 1986 publication.
|