|
|
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Extremely real in some ways, extremely not-real in others, September 8, 2003
I was designated as 'profoundly gifted' as a child, had some unusual abilities, and spent much of my adolescence in psychiatric institutions. As such, my identification with the 'gifted but troubled' kids in this book was extreme at times. I could understand the things they were saying, why they were saying them, and the ways in which they interacted with each other. I understood how deeply disturbed they were by the condition of the world around them, and I saw reflected in some of the characters my own tendency to connect with my non-human surroundings.However, as someone who spent a lot of time in psychiatric wards and special education with people who did not carry this designation of giftedness, I found some of the ideas disturbingly inaccurate. First of all, every single one of the gifted children was portrayed as misdiagnosed, while the other children were portrayed as properly diagnosed. While I have problems with the conventions of psychiatric labeling, these problems extend far beyond just gifted children. At one point, a character refers to the other children -- the non-gifted ones -- as "broken". So there is this unsettling dichotomy between the gifted-but-misdiagnosed kids and the broken kids. Reality is not that simple, and the book leans in the direction, as many institution-based books unfortunately do, of implying that some people should have been in such an oppressive environment and others should not have. The ones who should not have are the heroes of the book. Another concern is the stereotype -- which has gotten truly old by this point -- of the child diagnosed or misdiagnosed as autistic, who is really just extremely traumatized and possibly has special gifts or powers as well. I remember someone I knew, who was also autistic, reading this book and identifying strongly with it, up until she came to this character. Her response when they came to the point of describing autistic children who could read as not really understanding what we read was an exclamation of "What???" A large minority of autistic people are reading -- truly reading -- at an age well below the average reading age, yet this book uses the fact that a character is doing that as proof that he is not autistic (being autistic would, presumably, make him "broken", a stereotype a lot of autistic people are trying to fix). However, in all fairness, most clinicians don't realize that and would be as likely as the clinicians in the story to dismiss early reading as a meaningless splinter skill. The biggest problem I had with this whole area was the idea that these various characteristics being described existed in "gifted" children, but not in "broken" children, and that any diagnosis given to a gifted child was a sign of brokenness and therefore probably untrue. I have seen these same characteristics and skills in people with all kinds of diagnoses (for which the characteristics were often accurate, whether or not I agreed with the social implications of the diagnoses), and people with low IQ scores who would never be classified as gifted. My experiences as a psychiatric inmate and a special ed student led me to meet a lot of people who were like the people in this book, but who would never receive such a classification. Despite these misgivings, I found myself wishing, while reading this book, that I had a place like the Ark group home in the book to go to, much as I hate such environments in real life. To be somewhere where I am understood and not ostracized would be very nice, and to make the world a place where nobody -- not even those who are currently viewed as "broken" -- were ostracized, would be even better. I look forward, albeit with some uneasiness, to reading the sequels, and seeing where all these familiar characters go.
|