|
79 of 92 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Second best Plato collection in English, January 12, 2001
Here is what you get:CONTENTS Editorial Note (editors) Introduction (Huntington Cairns) Apology Crito Phaedo Charmides Laches Lysis Euthyphro Menexenus Lesser Hippias Ion Gorgias Protagoras Meno Euthydemus Cratylus Phaedrus Symposium Republic Theaetetus Parmenides Sophist Statesman Philebus Timaeus Critias Laws Epinomis * Greater Hippias * Letters * * denotes items whose authenticity is seriously doubted. The most irritating thing about this collection is the moronic, but mercifully short, Edith Hamilton introductions to the dialogues. Let us take some examples from her introduction to the dialogue "Euthyphro": "When Socrates asks what then is piety, he [Euthyphro] gives the answer characteristic of the orthodox everywhere - in effect 'Piety is thinking as I do.'" Is this really the case? Is that all that Moses, Isaiah, Paul, Augustine, Aquinas, and Martin Luther, to name only a few, had to say on the subject? Here is another: "Socrates makes a distinction fundamental in reasoning and often disregarded, that the good is good not because the gods approve it, but the gods approve it because it is good." There is several hundred years of intense philosophical and theological debate (still continuing) settled in a pretty summary fashion. Finally, there is this: "The real interest of the dialogue, however, is the picture of Socrates just before his trial...keenly involved in a discussion completely removed from his own situation." One of the charges against Socrates was of course impiety. Also, I guess, it is ridiculous to assume that there is much inherent interest or significance in asking questions about the metaphysical grounding of the good, especially by comparison with Hamilton's fascinating "People" magazine approach to philosophy. In one sense, the introductions do, however, perfectly introduce Plato. The multiple layers of stupidity in the introductions make a striking contrast with the multiple layers of insight in the dialogues themselves. When the reader goes from Hamilton to Plato, it is wonderfully pleasurable to feel the effect of the author's IQ jumping about 200 points. As others have noted, if you have a free choice, "Plato: Complete Works", edited by John M. Cooper is the Plato collection to get. The translations are more modern, the introductions are smarter (if not longer), the footnotes identifying people, places and events more numerous, and many more of the works of uncertain authenticity are included, which have historical significance if nothing else. If you do have to buy this collection for school or because it is used as a reference by some other work you're reading, don't despair. You're still getting Plato. Also, you're getting the better index. Here, for example, is the index entry for "habit" from this collection: habit: in education of infants, Laws 7.792e, force of, ib. 4.708c; and nature, ib. 7.794e; and temperament, ib. 2.655e; and virtue, Rep. 7.518e, 10.619c And here is the entry from the Cooper collection: habit: L. 2.655e, 4.708c, 7.792e, 7.794e; R. 7.518e, 10.619c.
|