|
|
27 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Typical British Druidry, February 21, 2004
The problem with selecting books to read on Druidism/Druidry today is that there are some huge differences between the way that the Druids in Britain and in America work. This book is a very short introduction into typical British Druidry.The key difference between the two is that British Druidry is very Wiccanised. This book is the prime example. It isn't to say that this is a bad thing...but I can hardly find any differences in Celtic Wicca and Druidry as described by Emma Restall Orr. I don't think, therefore, that this book is representative of the Druid movement or good for beginners. What do I mean by "Wiccanised"? 1.The use of the four Classical elements. It is popular in modern Paganism to use the four classical elements: earth, fire, air, and water. However, these are not the Celtic elements, which one would think should be used in Druidry, a Celtic religion. (those elements being only three: land, sea, and sky, or earth, air, and water) 2.Orr makes reference to casting a circle and working within the circle. In Druidic tradition, all things are sacred, and there is no need to sanctify space by casting a circle. Also, a circle is formed by the four elements, which I've explained are not Celtic. If you placed the Celtic elements they would form a triangle. Not only this, but casting a circle is a Wiccan practice. It was invented by Gerald Gardner and his lackeys and has no backing in any historical Celtic religion. 3.Her history... where are the references, where is the proof? There is no well documented history in this book, and if one is looking for a history on the Druids, I'd recommend "The Druids" by Peter Beresford Ellis. I have no huge critisisms for this book, or for Emma Restall Orr. I found "Spirits of the Sacred Grove" (now under the title "Druid Priestess") to be an enjoyable read. However, when Celtic Wicca is passed off as Druidism, I can't help but critisize it.
|