|
|
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Decent Book, but Not Recommended, June 22, 2004
If you're looking for out-of-this-world theories, shambling writing, and freakishly inept research, by all means, buy this book. However, if it's a truly objective guide to mysterious beings you want, you'd be better off turning to something like 'Cryptozoology A to Z."John A. Keel (who's this mysterious 'we' he keeps talking about?) claims in this book to be objective, presenting only the facts of the cases concerned so that the readers may draw their own conclusions. He then proceeds to outline his explanation for many of the occurrences, which, by the way, has something to do with an inter-dimensional 'something' using feeble human minds to mess with our lives and our planet. His style of writing seems to indicate that he believes that the phenomena and creatures mentioned don't really exist at all, and are all a part of the massive hoax being portrayed by something not of this Earth. Not only is his account subjective, it is patchy and uncoordinated, jumping from topic to topic with no apparent connections between them. It's as if he's written this book just to show off the sheer amount of stuff he knows as it comes to mind, without really attempting to organize it logically. In fact, his writing (which is somewhat amateurish and downright insulting at times) gives the impression that all he really wants to talk about is the Mothman of West Virginia, and he has to include these other phenomena just to justify the book's existence. Many of the facts not directly concerning the chornicled phenomena are inaccurate, including some of the biblical references, the dates, and the fact that he repeatedly asserts that the Mesozoic period ended a mere 9 million years ago...it was 65 millions years, sir. I'm sorry to disillusion you. In fact, the only saving grace of this book that I can detect is the sheer numbers of cases he records. His theories may be confusing and more than a little off-the-wall, but at least he masses the 'evidence' to 'support' them. It's a good resource to check when looking for accounts of the appearance of the phenomena, and I would recommend for that reason and that reason only. Keel, why don't you stick to the Mothman, huh?
|