Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
64 of 71 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Freedom isn't free, September 21, 2007
Great book on creeping nannyism in the U.S. The good thing about this book is that it doesn't present the case as being only about the "Left" trying to take our freedoms away (it includes an entire chapter on social conservatives). The book is about all kinds of "busybodies", who have a pet issue that they convince the local government to enforce. It usually is something they don't like and consider a "danger" (smoking, fast food, trans fats, alcohol, etc.).
Examples are of course smoking bans, "zero tolerance" alcohol policies, fun-free playgrounds (where any type of childhood exuberance is not tolerated), skateboarding bans, New York banning transfats, the Christian Right trying to ban pornography, etc.
Always, there is what the author calls a "nanny", who of course thinks they know better than us, what is good for us and society, and who then use police power to enforce this morality. The nanny is basically a puritanical authoritarian who can't tolerate anyone living differently than they do.
I can only say that this book rings very true. Having moved back to the U.S. from Germany, I noticed that even compared to Germany, there are a LOT of laws in the U.S. In Germany, there were also a lot of laws, but people were also much less uptight than Americans about certain things. For instance, it is legal in Germany for people as young as 17 or 16 to drink alcohol. And yet, there are not massive societal problems due to this. If you read and listen to the neo-temperance movement in the U.S., you would think that the world would end if we went back to the 18 drinking age.
Ditto many other things. In Germany, I noticed that older people might nag kids who skateboard around their neighborhood, but there are not the all-encompassing neighborhood bans on skateboarding, etc. that we have here. And why do we need them ? We then wonder why American kids turn to drugs, because they are so bored and so many things that might be fun are banned where they live. I personally think this is one reason American teens turn to drugs.
The Christian Right of course also wants to ban a lot of things, and they are in league with the Left on much of this ("zero tolerance"). I read through Sen. Brownback's recent book and it is scary how many things he wants to ban. And I think Brownback is typical for most "social conservatives" (under his and their logic, one could ban almost anything using the logic that it is "dangerous to the social fabric", and "harms the family". Exactly how family structures are harmed by porn, I fail to see, particularly considering that Utah is the U.S. state that downloads the most porn (and also has by far the strongest family structures in the U.S.).
Speakig of Utah, it is in some ways a great state. I found the state extremely clean and well organized. People are uber-friendly. But to me, it is one example of where we might be headed. Try ordering a beer in Utah. It is easier to get into some countries, than it is to order a beer in that state. They harrass you at every turn (this is why it is considered "America's least fun state"). Obviously, to the social conservative nanny, having fun on this earth is not a goal, and we should not have it as a goal. This is the religious philosophy behind bans - don't make life too fun, because that would be bad for religion.
I can tell you from personal experience of my own fight against the Nanny State. I live in Texas. As the author mentions, a Houston Democrat got it into his head that what Texas needs most is to not allow anyone to get a buzz on in a Texas bar. As the book mentions, the result was a practice in which police officers ("undercover") would "stake out" bars for people who "look inebriated". I am not kidding. They would arrest you INSIDE the bar. This happened particularly in Irving, Texas (coincidently, the world headquarters of Mothers Against Drunk Driving), and in some "po-dunk" counties outside Houston. [by the way, MADD is a useful organization, and has its purpose, but the author is also very correct in his attacks on MADD, because they have basically gone from being a safety-promoting organization to being an anti-alcohol organization].
All I can say is, if hundreds of us here in the Lone Star State had not gone absolutely ballistic and written to everyone in the state (the local news, the congressman, the governor, etc.), we might all be enjoying a cool lemonaide on Saturday night, rather than a beer, and Texas would right now be even worse than Utah, and all fun would have been exported out of state.
What I am trying to say is, yes, the author is right. The nannies are out there, and they are fighting hard. But we are also out there, and we are fighting hard. Write to congress, the governor. Go to local town council meetings. Write a blog. Write to your newspaper. Do something. It works !!
Freedom isn't free.
|
|
|
25 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book on Libertarianism, October 4, 2007
I first saw this book when Charley Reese had shown it in his article. When I saw it at the book store, I picked it up just to skim. Since then, this book has been a page turner I couldn't put down. The Libertarian ideas that are present can be used not only for the Libertarian but also for anyone that has a problem with big government. It goes to show how ridiculous some of the laws that have been instated have been. From laws requiring people to walk outside to smoke even in their own homes to taxes on fast-food, the book presents some great problems with big government.
|
|
|
26 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
What a frustrating book!, October 29, 2007
I think I discovered that there was a latent Libertarian living inside me after reading this book. Helmet laws, seat-belt laws, smoking laws have always bugged the heck out of me, and this book helped me explore why. This is one of those books that you wish every homeowner's association, city council, statehouse and federal house would read, as it systematically chronicles the good-intentioned road to hell that the anal-retentive control-freaks (he calls them nannies) daily pave. The material is endless, the stories are fascinating, but be warned that the feeling of frustrated anger can be about overwhelming at times as you watch a suburban mom spend time in jail for failing to "click it", or listen to how someone has lost the right to disable a (later proven) harmful airbag in his own car. The nannies have run wild, and the cost has been our liberty, and it is incredibly rewarding to hear someone so eloquently pointing out the process. Hopefully it's the beginning of taking back our country from those who would take away our dodgeball, our tag, and our rights to be as dumb as we want to be as long as it doesn't infringe on someone else.
Again, great reading, well-reasoned analysis, and courage to take on and defend the unpopular in the defense of liberty. Actual doing the job the ACLU claims to do and rarely does.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
by Andrew P. Napolitano
by Ron Paul
by Amity Shlaes
See all Editorial Reviews
