Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lord or Legend, December 16, 2008
In Lord or Legend Boyd and Eddy are not out to prove with absolute certainty that the Bible is accurate, because they understand in reality it is impossible to prove anything about the past. They do however, present the historical evidence that is found for Jesus as not just a man, but as Christ and also evidence for the reliability of the Bible. Though they are both pastors, they have great insight that goes beyond their faith. I think this book can help Christians and non-Christians see Jesus from a different perspective then maybe they have before. It is great that someone from the Christian circle is not afraid to jump into historical and often secular discussion about Jesus. Lord or Legend? is a question we all should not be afraid to explore. I think this book is a great start to a discussion about who Jesus was historically and what that means for us now.
|
|
|
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Open-Minded Look at the Life of Christ, December 8, 2008
Boyd and Eddy present excellent arguments for the credibility of the Gospels and the divinity of Christ in this book. They address all of the major claims against the reliability of Scripture with honesty and humility, admitting that they have also had their doubts in Christianity but that its truth stands up against critical examination. Boyd and Eddy do not even claim that the historical evidence proves with absolute certainty that every aspect of the Gospel's portrait of Jesus is historically accurate, but they do claim that if one remains open to the historical possibility of that portrait they will find this to be the most historically probable understanding available. Form this open outlook the authors approach such topics as belief in the supernatural, the theology and culture of first-century Judaism, the accounts of the apostle Paul, the genre of the Gospels in relation to Jewish oral traditions, the historical veracity of the Gospel texts, the credibility of the Gospel authors, the consistency and plausibility of Scripture, and the literary and archeological evidence of the Gospels. In each of these discussions Boyd and Eddy compare the claims of Scripture and the arguments against it with historical evidence and logical reasoning apart from their beliefs as Christian men and provide extremely credible conclusions for the divinity of Christ. This book is great for anyone, Christian or non-Christian, who is willing to approach the historical life of Christ with an open mind and see where the evidence leads.
|
|
|
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Historical Veracity of Jesus Christ's Diety, August 5, 2009
Gregory A. Boyd and Paul Rhodes Eddy co-authored "Lord or Legend?" for "critically minded laypeople" in hopes that their research would "provide a solid intellectual foundation" to their faith, and they are true to their mission. The book's content is very academic in nature, covering two specific areas of study: 1) earliest religious beliefs and mythology and 2) the historical reliability of the Gospels in the Bible. This book was a challenging piece for me, and I consider myself to be a voracious and eclectic reader. Not only were the authors intellectual experts in their field--ancient historical veracity-- but their vocabulary sprang from a veritable dictionary tucked away in each mind. More than once, I found myself re-reading a sentence to grasp its message.
Due to my Christian upbringing, I have seldom had cause to consider some of the arguments touted by naturalists, so Boyd and Eddy's work was a trip into uncharted territory for me. Indeed, some of the opposing positions and interpretations of Jesus' story were absolutely fascinating! For example, Boyd and Eddy tackle "The Discrepancies within and between the Gospels" with surprising integrity, bringing to light apparent contradictions I never knew existed.
The authors also weave a fascinating thread of Jewish history and religious customs throughout their analysis of the "Lord or Legend?" debate. And since their use of the historical-critical method closely studies topics such as oral tradition, textual reconstruction, and literary corroboration, the peppered anecdotes and authors' personal insights help ease the cerebral focus of the text.
Because Boyd and Eddy so convincingly refute, or at least reasonably explain away, nearly every legend theorists' argument, I was almost relieved to read their concession that the "Testimonium Flavianum" we have today is, in all probability, a reconstructed version of Josephus's original. The authors had previously, however, established that Josephus, the single most important Jewish historian in ancient times, indisputably acknowledged Jesus' very existence. So the slight allowance for the Christian interpolation in the "Testimonium Flavianum" does little to alleviate the authors' unashamed (and valid!) bias.
"Lord or Legend?" is an invaluable volume for readers seeking intellectual, compelling arguments for and against the historical veracity of the Jesus story. Boyd and Eddy gave me a greater appreciation and understanding of the struggle some have for accepting Jesus as God, while deepening my own beliefs for accepting Jesus for Who He said He is. As they so eloquently put it, "No story could be imagined in which a lover sacrificed more for a beloved who deserved it less."
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|