From Booklist
Philosopher Sorabji, Professor of Ancient Philosophy at King's College, University of London, skillfully explores the debate in Western thought over the moral status of animals. Beginning with its roots in the arguments presented by Aristotle and the Stoics, the central argument concerns whether or not animals have the requisite "rationality" to be treated as equals or near-equals, with most sides arguing that they do not. "Rationality" usually being defined by these philosophers as the ability to speak, the Western view has been that animals "don't have syntax, so we can eat them." Still, these philosophers are forced to negotiate many mental twists and turns to make their theories fit their own conflicting perceptions of what animals are and aren't capable of knowing and doing. Medieval Christian beliefs on the subject are also discussed, and a thoughtful critique on the more contemporary belief systems of animal rights proponents Singer, Reagan, and Midgley is presented. Recommended for anyone concerned with or interested in the origins of today's animal rights debate.
Brian McCombie
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Description
"[Sorabji] starts . . . by examining philosophical treatments of animals in ancient Greece. From there he goes on to current thinking and argues that the animal rights movement is philosophically incoherent. His philosophical analysis is so thorough that anyone who's thinking about these issues has an obligation to read this book."--Vicki Hearne, Lingua Franca