|
32 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Still a Current Issue, September 25, 2002
I finished reading, "Brotherhood Of The Bomb", by Gregg Herken on the same afternoon I read about new mini nuclear devices in two separate science magazines. These devices could theoretically change the policies regarding the use of these weapons as a first strike device by the Government of the United States. Small is a relative term, but these would be 1/100th the size of the Hiroshima bomb, or even smaller. There purpose would be to destroy bunkers that are located 250-300 feet below ground level.What should be done with atomic and thermonuclear weapons became and remained a divisive and astonishingly expensive issue for almost 40 years. The estimated cost of these weapons was estimated at $5.5 trillion dollars. And with the exception of the two used at the close of the war, none were ever used again in any conflict. The very existence of tens of thousands of warheads, and with them the ability to fundamentally alter or extinguish human life on earth, kept them in there silos or respective hangars and submarines. For readers new to the story of this part of scientific history you may wish to read more about the actual weapons before proceeding with this book. This book is about a few of the central personalities and their decades long fighting and deep-seated negative feelings that bordered on hatred. These emotions were the direct result of the differing views held by these scientists that grew from vying opinions of what was built, what was theoretically possible to construct, and how they should be used. It is naïve to feel that great scientific minds that create weapons that could possibly destroy our planet should be substantially different in temperament from the average human being. One would like to think they would be coldly objective when discussing what should be built, what can be built, and whether or not the weapons should be used. In this book Greg Herken shares conflict among some of the best known of the scientists and the lengths that were traveled to marginalize, and even criminalize one for the benefit of the other. Teller and Oppenheimer were compared by the author to Jefferson and Adams as two men who greatly changed the circumstances of the time they lived in, and then carried bitter differences between them to the grave. Teller remained active decades after the death of his nemesis, and of all the years he spent attacking Oppenheimer directly or in concert with members of the government. If this activity had been confined to the fruitcakes lead by McCarthy they would be easier to dismiss. But Teller never relented from leading the opposition against a man he wanted discredited, and criminally prosecuted. Oppenheimer was stripped of his Q Clearance security access one day before it was to expire. Since this came years after he helped lead the creation of a variety of weapons, the decision not to extend his clearance was worthy of the closed door kangaroo court he was judged by. What was even more disturbing were the absolutely illegal acts committed for years in an attempt to discredit him and any one he had contact with that the paranoids in Washington were concerned about. Imagine you are going to trial, behind closed doors, with the following handicaps. Your home, your office, and those of your attorney are illegally wiretapped so the prosecution knows everything you plan for your defense in advance. They know everything they have no right to know because the laws of the country forbid such invasions of privacy. Again another man of dubious mental stability was at the helm of these illegal wiretaps, the rather infamous J. Edgar Hoover. But even with all of the power of legal and illegal government, Oppenheimer was found guilty of nothing, and he lost his security clearance by a vote of 2 to 1, and this vote by a hand picked group guaranteed to vote against him. Security and infiltration by scientists, with communist politics, of the Manhattan Project did exist. They were in place from the very beginning with one example being Klaus Fuchs. Many others were guilty of youthful naiveté, but being a practitioner of pathetic judgment and turning over critical state secrets during a time of war are very different issues. I have never read any credible information that Oppenheimer was ever a communist much less a spy. His brother may have been a bit dimmer in his judgment, but again he was never even accused of passing secrets. But this was a time when lying about being present at a gathering at a person's home where radical issues were discussed could and did destroy many careers and lives. Telling the truth had basically the same effect. A refusal to take a loyalty oath also ended many careers. This is a great book on the human side of some of the men who are so well known as the creators of the most destructive weapons ever conceived. That they were brilliant has never been an issue, that they are human, and sometimes uncomfortably so, considering the positions they were in, is a new and somewhat troubling view.
|