Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
38 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Unflinching Look at the Cauldron that Forges Women, October 17, 2002
By A Customer
With a lens that doesn't shy away from the 4 year old in a mini sequined gown, the cheesy backstage of a Las Vegas strip club, a surgical suite during a breast augmentation, or Panama Beach, FL at spring break, Lauren Greenfield's wide ranging photoessay provides an honest insider's view of the culture that forges women in the U.S. today. Anyone raising girls, anyone who was a girl, and anyone interested in trying to understand women, should have this book! What a magnificent find!
|
|
|
34 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
ARTWEEK REVIEW - FEBRUARY 2003, February 11, 2003
By A Customer
Lauren Greenfield's photographs from her most recent project, Girl Culture, represents an important return to traditional photography and a break with the popular, staged work of the past decade. Using a 35mm camera and working intuitively and spontaneously, Greenfield returns to the basics - picturing that which is important and reorganizing the chaos of the real world into compelling and complex images that speak to our experiences as emotional beings. This may sound simple, but over the past ten years, photographers have moved far from the traditional approach and into the imaginative fictions of Hollywood films, utilizing elaborate productions crews and massive digital prints. Greenfield, in a powerful and compelling exhibition and book, brings photography back down to earth, and in doing so, signals a shift in contemporary picture making.Greenfield has spent more than five years photographing young women and girls, plumbing the zeitgeist for clues about body image, self-esteem, consumerism and sexuality. As you can imagine, the results are not pretty. They are skewed toward the complicated psychological arena where self-awareness is mixed with victimization. The exhibition and book are quite different experiences due to the fact that the publication included interviews with the subjects. For a full appreciation of how vital this work is to photography and to women¹s studies, it is important to see them both. I found a pervasive sadness to the interviews, wherein women spoke of the pressures to be thin, stylish and sexual and then expressed admiration for these ideals, like an alcoholic who continues drinking, encouraging others to join in. The exhibition at Stephen Cohen Gallery is immediately remarkable due to the intimate scale of the photographs. The prints range from 11 by 14 inches to 16 by 20 inches with only a few being larger. This changes the experience of the work by drawing the viewers in close to read and interpret the images. Besides the modest print size, when we get close to the photographs, we can see the tiny specks of grain and notice that some of them are a bit out of focus. This may seem sound like a criticism, but these imperfections are a refreshing departure from the majority of contemporary photography, suggesting the haphazard complexity of real life and the medium¹s dependence on the artist¹s unique vision. Greenfield¹s photographs are well known from major magazines and often display a biting criticism and acerbic wit. These characteristics are used mercilessly in some of the images. Lillian, then 18, shops at Kirna Zabete, New York shows the pretty blonde sitting in an upscale boutique, holding a red shoe. Her mouth hangs open in mid-sentence and its red-lined, oval shape is echoed in the red, open-toed, ankle-strapped slingback she is holding. Lillian reeks of having too much money and too little taste, and the photograph is an indictment of her shallowness and vanity. In the interview, Lillian says she hates being a blonde but claims to be so only because she¹s an actress. Her awareness of the burden of beauty is outweighed by her greedy consumerism. Another highly critical image shows pornographic film star Taylor Wayne, who, dripping in jewelry, strikes a clichéd pose, her massive breasts practically bursting from her dress. She looks like a parody of herself, more of a mannequin than a real woman. Greenfield¹s tone is more forgiving when she examines subjects who have less control over their lives. The photographs of kids and teenagers, some at weight-loss camp, exude a compassion that is balanced with the artist¹s critical eye. Paula, 11, at weight-loss camp, Catskill, New York is heartbreaking but empowering. Apprehensive of the camera, the pudgy girl with crimson cheeks turns her body away, clasping her hands in front of her chest defensively. Greenfield photographs her in the shade without a flash, and the soft, cool-cyan light bespeaks the girl¹s vulnerability. Using wide-angle lens and slightly tilting the camera, she keeps our attention on the girl¹s face and accents her expression and wide body. The image is gentle but also has the effect of suggesting her inner power and creates an optimism not seen in the more critical pictures. So too with the image of Joyce, Elysia and Alison at their friend¹s sixteenth birthday party. Instead of primping or showing off, the three girls embrace and comfort each other. The picture is so intimate that it reveals an emotional support system so vital to many of the younger women pictured here. The power and importance of Greenfield¹s work arises from its combination of poignant subject matter, powerful compositions and framing, and the profound connection between the subject and tradition the artist creates through her masterful technique. The only weakness in the work is the dense contrast between shadows and lights in many of the prints which takes away from their emotional strengths. Greenfield is often referred to as a photojournalist, which understates her importance in the art world. She is certainly not driven to make pictures just because she is on assignment, but more likely out of the desire to express her personal vision through relevant subjects. Like Nan Goldin who, in 1987, showed that there was more to photography than postmodern intellectualism, Greenfield takes us away from the monotonous, digitized unreality of so much contemporary fine art photography. In so doing, she reestablishes the primacy of the individual artist¹s vision in connecting passion and subject matter.
|
|
|
27 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
American Photo Review Jan/Feb 2003, December 19, 2002
They are always blond, it seems, and always thin: the Popular Girls of every woman's haunted teenage memories. They are named Monique or Sandy or, of course, Heather, and their lithe legs stretch a mile from their fashionably rolled-up shorts to their totally cool sneakers - a degree of stylistic perfection unattainable by mere mortals. They seem so preternaturally gifted that you wonder whether such grace can persist into adulthood. (Maybe you hope it doesn't.) You also wonder whether these girls are happy. Lauren Greenfield wondered just that when she traveled to Edina, Minnesota, in 1998 to photograph a story for The New York Times Magazine on the expansive topic of "being 13." Her pictures of the glorious blond Alpha Girls ruling over the seventh grade there began to provide an answer. The photos also began to convince Greenfield that there was much to be revealed about the real lives of American girls. It all led to a new book, Girl Culture (Chronicle Books, $40), an ambitious effort that blurs the distinction between photojournalism, art, and social science. (An accompanying exhibition of the images opened in October at the Pace/MacGill Gallery in New York and will be traveling to the Stephen Cohen Gallery in Los Angeles in December and the Robert Koch Gallery in San Francisco in January.) "What I learned shooting the 'popular girls' in Edina was how hard it was to stay on top," says Greenfield, "and how insecure they felt about their social position. One said she was afraid she would come to school one day and suddenly find that she wasn't in the popular group anymore. Another girl said that if she could do it over again, she'd rather have real friends who liked her for who she was." Instead, she was rewarded for who she appeared to be. That raw truth - the tyranny of appearance in the lives of young girls and women-lies at the center of Greenfield's book. The girls in Girl Culture range from four-year-olds playing dress-up in spangly princess outfits to awkward teenagers arriving at a weight-loss summer camp to Las Vegas showgirls and strippers plying their trade. In one way or another, all of them are defined by how they look. Like the photographs in Greenfield's first book, 1997's acclaimed Fast Forward: Growing Up in the Shadow of Hollywood, the images in Girl Culture are often weighty with unflinching detail. In one shot, a showgirl named Anne-Margaret is seen reflected in her dressing-room mirror at the Stardust Hotel in Las Vegas. Taped to the side of the mirror is a handwritten note that reads I APPROVE OF MYSELF alongside pictures of models the dancer admires. That picture, shot on assignment for Stern magazine, got Greenfield thinking "about how girls construct their identities, how they use pieces of the outside world to express themselves." Soon, Greenfield, who recently became a member of the VII photo agency, began seeing aspects of girl culture all around her: on an assignment in Florida shooting a story on spring break, with its "girls gone wild" partying; while photographing Chattanooga, Tennessee, debutantes who complained about being fat as a size four; and while shooting the Edina teenagers, whose unforgiving social structure was described by one of their mothers as consisting of "tier-one, tier-two, and tier-three girls." Putting the book together, Greenfield says, was an intuitive process. "I made a lot of different pictures that seemed like pieces of the puzzle," she says, "but I didn't know until I was editing it whether they would all fit together." The puzzle included some surprising juxtapositions, tying together the worlds of girls and adult women. "When I looked at the exhibitionism of strippers, it reminded me of little girls and how they perform, how they look for approval," the photographer says. "In pictures, you can't help seeing the similarities in dress and body language." The work was also cathartic. Greenfield was once, after all, a little girl who grew into a woman in the American body culture, and she recounts her own teenage years of chronic dieting, anxiety about her own popularity, and a conviction that her outer appearance reflected the imperfections that lurked on the inside. In this Greenfield has plenty of company. One eating-disorder clinic estimates that 85 percent of adult females wake up each morning dissatisfied with their weight and appearance, determined to somehow replicate the ever-shrinking dimensions of "lollipop" actresses and models (so called because their heads look oversized atop their sticklike frames). Joan Jacobs Brumberg, a historian at Cornell University, who wrote the introduction to Greenfield's book, feels that the current cultural environment, fueled by commercial forces outside the family and community, is actually toxic for adolescent girls "because of the anxieties it generates about the developing female body and sexuality." One bright spot in this dispiriting landscape of insecurity and self-blame is the rise of girls' athletics, which is credited with giving at least some girls a body identity that arises from their abilities rather than their decorativeness. Greenfield says that the athletes she photographed-including tennis star Venus Williams, members of the Stanford University women's swim team, and players on the Little Indians softball team in Naples, Florida, where girls' softball is a local tradition-had a sense of a goal broader than themselves. "They have a larger and more important context in which to see themselves," she says, "that has to do with making a faster time, or coming through for their team, rather than simply looking good when they walk out the door." The book also features Greenfield's bracingly honest interviews with some of the girls she photographed, such as Stephanie, 14, whom the photographer met at the weight-loss camp, and Sheena, a 15-year-old struggling with her body image (see page 56). "I think it's a challenging culture for girls to grow up in," Greenfield admits. "My role isn't to condemn it, but to try to show the pieces, to put them together. This book is a subjective view of one aspect of the girl culture. It's not the whole story, but it's the part of the story that leaves no one untouched."
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|