Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Splendor of Discipleship, February 9, 2000
Another Dulles masterpiece---clear, balanced, sympathetic to the pope's position but not without some critical questions. The book gets at the religious vision animating the moral and political positions. A dazzler.
|
|
|
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent Theological Condensation, July 7, 2001
This is one of the best books that I have read on the theology of Pope John Paul II. The book Witness To Hope by George Weigel was good but lacked the theological ideas/philosophy of this Pope. I highly recommend this book as to Catholic theology for both Catholics and Protestants.
|
|
|
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Doing JUSTICE to John Paul, November 24, 2008
An American friend of mine once remarked that most people's impression of John Paul II amounts to little more than `pro-life, anti-communist'.
Now if one counts oneself a traditional Catholic, as I myself do, the above perception indicates nothing less than tragedy on an enormous scale.
Heartbreaking tragedy, as I consider all the implications involved in millions of people believing in John Paul as representing little else, than being against abortion and communism ...
A Papacy that can hardly be reduced to `pro-life, anti-communist', but which over twenty-six years addressed and rejuvenated countless dimensions of the Catholic faith. leaving countless numbers with a profound sense that they have witnessed one of the greatest, most overarching and far-reaching papacies of the past two thousand years.
What is desperately needed then, is literature that testifies to the sweeping scope and enormity of John Paul's mission.
To this task, Avery Dulles' book makes a most admirable contribution. Clearly it focuses on John Paul's thinking and teaching, rather than his vast legacy of decisive, pragmatic ACTION that had such enormous geopolitical impact - including though not limited to, the Gandhi-like pacifist movement begun in 1950's Poland by the future pope - then a simple priest - which would so alter the world.
(For as Gorbachev said, 'Without the Pope from Poland, the mighty changes in Eastern Europe would have been inconceivable.' But for that story, one will need books like Weigel's Catholic biography `Witness to Hope' or Kwitney's non-Catholic biography `Man of the Century', which reveals John Paul both as a very ***human*** being, with both human shadows and human greatness ...)
But here in Dulles' book, what we get is not a focus on John Paul's vast legacy of direct action and initiative, but on his equally vast legacy of ideas.
As Dulles makes clear in highly accessible layperson's language, the scope of what John Paul addressed was truly STAGGERING.
Truly staggering then - once one gets beyond the media stereotypes - is not only John Paul's profound and personalist meditation on the Christian Mystery, but also its implications for our contemporary culture in countless regards - from economics to human rights, from ecumenism to the world religions, from war and non-violence, to secularism and epistemology, from gender and the `Theology of the Body' ... to how much else besides? The list goes on ...
(How many people, for example, would credit the man who became John Paul II, with radically arguing for the importance of the female orgasm in ***1950's Poland***?!).
And running like a golden thread of love through all of his profound thought, there is the dignity, the dignity of the human being, human freedom, human rights and EMBODIED human existence ... the new dignity conferred to all of these through the Mystery of Christ.
There is so much more one can say about John Paul's epic achievement. But this is a book review and not a book. I will simply leave the reader with a small sampling of the rich panorama, which Dulles' book details in depth.
In the interest of integrity, I will also note that my very small selection is not without bias on my part.
I am, as I have said, deeply concerned with the inherent tragedy and evil I see in smearing John Paul's legacy with a reductionist caricature such as `pro-life, anti-communist'.
The world deserves the truth and my own selection here is purposely made to balance the one-sided portrayal of the media. That said, here is a sampling of Dulles' exegesis of John Paul's thinking (which was clearly written during the late pontiff's lifetime).
On matters of social order and economics, Dulles explores not only John Paul's stringent critique of communism, but also of `capitalist neo-liberalism' which as [John Paul] puts it `subordinates the human person to blind market forces and conditions the development of peoples on those forces. From its centres of power, such neo-liberalism often places unbearable burdens upon less favoured countries'.
In explicating John Paul's social thinking, Dulles himself is worth quoting at length:
'John Paul describes the devastating effects of consumerism in many of his encyclicals ... In the consumerist culture, he says, the market is flooded with luxury goods that are acquired for purposes of amusement or as status symbols.
The rich are surfeited by a superabundance of possessions and ***enslaved*** by the tasks of managing and protecting their wealth. Meanwhile the poor are left in dire misery ...
In accordance with his personalist humanism, John Paul II insists on the priority of labor over capital...
Labor, while it should ideally redound to the benefit of the laborer as individual, has larger purposes.
It is intended also to benefit the family, the nation, and the universal human community.
Opposing the unbridled thirst for profits and power, John Paul II calls for a theology of development that takes account of the whole human person and every person.
Authentic development, he maintains, must respect the cultural, transcendent and religious dimensions of human life.
In light of these broadly humanistic goals, it is possible to correct some of the errors of what the pope calls "ECONOMISM" - a view that elevates enterprises only in terms of productivity and profits [Emphasis mine].'
To turn to another set of issues, there is John Paul's rejection of authoritarianism in the Church. In this context, Dulles cites the entire legacy of John Paul's work, including his contribution to Vatican II, made while he was still a bishop from Poland.
The book makes clear then, the future John Paul's role in Vatican II's thinking on religious freedom and how that has continued to be expressed in his teaching, quoting him as saying: `Religious freedom, an essential requirement of the dignity of every person, is a cornerstone of the structure of human rights ...
The Church addresses people with full respect for their freedom. Her mission does not restrict freedom, but rather promotes it. THE CHURCH PROPOSES; SHE IMPOSES NOTHING [Emphasis in original]'.
Had the late Pope been simply the ultraconservative caricature, so often presented by the media, the Vatican II trajectory of freedom would have been negated ... rather than reinforced.
But as Dulles makes clear to the unprejudiced reader, John Paul's papacy worked to extend Vatican II's commitment to human rights and freedom.
Clearly related to the issue of religious freedom, is the matter of the salvific value of other religions. For it must be admitted that for many centuries, the Catholic Church can be seen as intimidating non-Catholics with fear of hellfire ...
But a radical new thrust has been born in Catholicism, and Dulles documents how much, how very much, the Pope from Poland has had to do with this.
This revolutionary thrust emerged clearly at the Second Vatican Council, where major positive statements about other religions, were made for the first time.
As Dulles makes clear, John Paul continually re-emphasised the new approach of Vatican II in innumerable ways.
At this point, I find myself disagreeing with Dulles somewhat, when he writes that in his treatment of other religions, 'John Paul II ... makes no doctrinal moves that clearly go beyond the council, but he does give an interpretation of the council that, at least in emphasis, is original.'
In other words, John Paul cannot be said to have definitively gone beyond the council - except in his emphasis, his emphatic call that is, to value other religions.
But my own feeling is that John Paul's teaching on the other religions is definitely more radical than anything offered by Vatican II.
For example,John Paul has said:
'Normally, it will be in the sincere practice of what is good in their own religious traditions and by following the dictates of their own conscience, that the members of other religions respond positively to God's invitation and receive salvation in Jesus Christ, even while they do not recognise or acknowledge him as their saviour.'
Thus, the head of 60% of global Christianity, decisively sheds the usual interpretation of Extra Ecclesiam Nullus Sallus (`Outside the Church, there is no salvation') by arguing that the **normal** way for non-Christians is through their own religion. And in my view, this is more decisive than anything said by Vatican II.'
In regards to the matter of salvation, Dulles also draws attention to the controversy surrounding what may yet amount to one of the most radical, groundbreaking positions ever held by any Pope, ever.
For although it is not at all clear, there is evidence, that late in his life John Paul may have joined with Origen, John Henry Newman and Hans Urs von Balthasar in questioning eternal hell ...
That is, though it is not clear-cut, John Paul may have said: "Eternal damnation remains a real possibility, but we are not granted, without special divine revelation, the knowledge of WHETHER or which human beings are effectively involved in it(Emphasis mine).'
Yes, if John Paul did write these words, it would consolidate the view that may increasingly emerge of John Paul II in future years ... a faithful traditionalist, faithful in this case, to the traditional Christian teaching of Hell, yet unwilling to condemn anyone to perdition or even to admit that human beings must necessarily be involved with...
Read more ›
|
|
|
|
by Avery Robert Cardinal Dulles
by Avery Dulles
by Avery Cardinal Dulles
by Avery Robert Cardinal Dulles
