Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Remarkable insight into everyday Shinto, November 20, 2005
More than just a primer on Shintoism, Kasulis has authored an intelligent and indispensible book on understanding Japan and the Japanese. My neck muscles were getting tired from the constant nodding with assent at the many revelations (Ah! Naruhodo!) Few philosophers have been quite this successful in making the apparently mystical appear quite comprehensible.
The key point is that Kasulis successfuly explains the everyday joys of Shinto (which is what practioners actually relate to) rather than bogging down in doctrine that few Japanese are actually concerned with. A doctrinal approach to Shinto this is NOT, so if your goal is to know Susanoo no mikoto from Amaterasu Ômikami, then this may not be your best book on the topic. But to UNDERSTAND Shinto, you can do no better.
|
|
|
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Unexpectedly interesting, August 8, 2006
Spoke to a prof from University of Hawaii. Requested an introductory list on Eastern philosophy. Was pointed to this very clearly-written book for Shinto.
Found the book unexpectedly interesting -- in particular its first chapter, on Shinto spirituality: fertile food-for-thought for philosophy of religion (eg, definitions of "religion" and "spirituality", and nature of religious experience), as well as novel take on mental dualism.
The remainder of the book: essentially a survey of the history of Shinto -- less interesting philosophically, but still engaging as a case study of religious development. I do feel, on having read the book, that I've travelled miles in my understanding of Japan.
What does Kasulis say? He distinguishes "existentialist" from "essentialist". In "Mary is a comedian", the description is "existentialist" if you're describing (ie, Mary tells a lot of jokes) but "essentialist" if you're commenting on Mary's nature (ie, Mary tells a lot of jokes *because* she is a comedian). Kasulis wants (if I'm reading him properly) to "rescue" Shinto -- to separate an existentialist Shinto heart from an essentialist and expansionist ideology.
The middle section covers some 1400 years of Shinto development, along with forays into Japanese history generally. It's fascinating, but biased towards the existentialist yay, essentialist boo position. And there are worries here. On the one hand, maybe you're won't find a summary this short, and this comprehensive, without this level of vagueness; on the other hand, the glossing-over, and neatness of explanation, might raise the suspicion of skewed narrative. I just don't know enough Japanese history to fairly judge.
Here's my own glossed-over summary of some key points:
Chapter 1: When people disconnect from capacity for awe, they feel homeless. Shinto spirituality is about learning to feel "at home" with spiritually encountering mystery -- and not trying to explain away such experiences. Awe can come upon you suddenly, or can be found in the everyday; can be caused by nature (a glorious sunset), or by the manufactured (the original Magna Carta); and can be associated with joy or fear. Such presences are "kami". Kami is interdependent with the material, not separate from it. Shinto marks places that are specially able to give rise to feelings of being part of and "holographically" reflecting the whole. But one requires a "mindful heart": Shinto practices nurture sensitivity and responsiveness. Kasulis also discusses whether Shinto counts as a "religion" or is a cluster of folk beliefs.
Chapter 2: Shinto themes (including naturalness, simplicity, purity and taboo, purification, and separateness and communal solidarity) are part of the warp and woof of everyday Japanese life.
Chapter 3: Time immemorial up to eighth century. Native religion was in part animist, but "kami" was also associated with forces of nature. Shinto myths lack a cosmic struggle between good and evil. Kasulis contrasts two key eighth-century collections of folk traditions ("Nihonshoki" and "Kojiki") and touches on connections of the former with justifications for empire.
Chapter 4: Eighth to nineteenth centuries. Growth of essentialist Shinto was contravened by Buddhist-Shinto syncretism. When Buddhism waned, Shinto attempted to build an original philosophy -- the "Native studies" movement, exemplified by Motoori Norinaga, who spent three decades interpreting Kojiki.
Chapter 5: 1801-2002. Hirata Atsutane rendered Shinto suitable for expansionism, by, inter alia, emphasizing the emperor as holographic entry point and introducing afterlife reward. Starting with Hirata Shinto, the government supported an essentialist ideology of "State Shinto", which involved, for instance, distancing Shinto from Buddhism, and a religion of "Shrine Shinto", whose practices were compulsory and whose beliefs were equated with being Japanese. The allied powers could not dismantle State Shinto entirely: Kasulis discusses the Yasukuni shrine.
Chapter 6: It's difficult to separate "existentialist" and "essentialist" in Japan. Also, the existential/essential distinction can be applied to many, if not most, religions, and there's frequently a power struggle in terms of the dominance of one or the other.
|
|
|
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Deep Insights into The Nature of Religion, using Shinto As An Example, October 25, 2007
I generally expect books like these on the subject of Anthropology to be either dry and merely informative on one hand or dim-witted and missing big, important points on the other. This book was neither!
The author, not content with describing surface characteristics of Shinto or describing it in classical religious studies terminology that is biased towards religions such as Christianity and Islam, spends a great deal of time developing terminology and concepts that are unique to Shinto and these types of primitive religions.
Not only does he delve into the very psychology of religion, he discusses the oft-neglected relationship between intellectuals who invent ideology and folk beliefs that are simply passed down over the generations.
The most important thing to get from the book for a Westerner is essentialist/existentialist "split" the author talks about (though he later says the two forms overlap considerably), especially since the former is vastly dominant in Western/Abrahamic religions.
Overall, well written and easy to read (he goes over things and refers back to previous chapters to keep continuity) and highly recommended for anyone into Japanese history, world religions/anthropology or the psychology and nature of religion.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|