|
|
25 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Lots of potential, but ultimately mediocre, October 8, 2001
Lutzer chose a very good title and a very good premise for writing this book. And while there were parts of the book that were quite good, he ultimately tried to bite off more than he could chew with this book in my view.Lutzer's premise for the book is that there are ten 'lies' about God that he intends to analyze and refute. These lies are indeed attention grabbing and successfully generate interest in the reader to read what Lutzer has to say. Unfortunately in my view, in order to really do justice to many of these 'lies', much more than a chapter of examination is desperately in order. Whole books could be written on many of the lies that Lutzer attempts to contain within 20 page chapters, and the result is a book that doesn't dig nearly deep enough to do justice to the very compelling lies and subsequent questions that are asked in this book. Each of the lies are the starting points for the chapters in the book. I think Lutzer did a good job of identifying many popularly held views about God. The lies in this book are quite pervasive throughout the culture and it is good that Lutzer attempted to discredit them. But all too often, I found that the chapters started out better than they ended, with Lutzer doing a good job of setting the table, but falling short in the quality of the meal. In particular, Lutzer repeatedly reinforced what I guess is a deeply held belief of his that I don't agree with, and it is this belief that often hurts the quality of his analysis, in my view. In my view, he too often takes the easy way out on tough questions related to purpose, suffering, creation, and omnipotence by essentially saying that good answers aren't available to these kind of questions. Lutzer makes what I believe to be a cardinal mistake in today's church by appealing not to a faith bolstered by intellectual sensibility and emotional satisfaction, but to a faith that at its core, is anti intellectual. As such, at several key points in his book where a solid, Biblically based intellectual and philosophical examination would not only be appropriate but very compelling as both an intellectual and emotional proposition, Lutzer punts by essentially saying 'I don't know' way too often. And this is the fundamental failure of the book. I guess I'm not sure why Lutzer felt it necessary to write a book about a number of compelling topics if he didn't have more meat to offer. The ten 'lies' about God that Lutzer profiles are good and relevant topics for discussion. But unfortunately in my view, like most of the book, his ending points are not nearly as compelling as his starting points, where the reader is left with an appreciation of the immensity of God and how much we don't know, but no appreciation for how much God has revealed to us about Himself and how much we do know. And in my view, by falling short in his analysis of the ten lies in this way, he inadvertently goes a long way toward contributing to another lie about God - God is unknowable. So in conclusion, I would recommend this book to anyone who is struggling with appreciating the immensity of God. But for those who might pick up this book looking for tangible answers about the nature of God, His purposes, the reasons why things happen the way they do, I would suggest that they not base their whole analysis of these difficult issues to this book, and would commend them to additional research and examination of other books which more adequately address these areas. Because in my view, Lutzer simply doesn't do justice to many of these issues here. Readers who pick up this book to gain emotional solace or satisfaction on some of these issues may or may not find enough meat in here, but readers who turn to this book for intellectual sustenance on these issues will encounter too many chapters where the author at least flirts with anti intellectualism, and presents a God who too often doesn't reveal Himself or His purposes at all. And as a matter of both theology and emotional experience, I fundamentally take issue with this sentiment and believe it to be wholly inadequate to the God of the Bible and how He has revealed His purposes and holiness not only in Scripture but in the annals of human history in ways we can know and gain comfort and hope from.
|