Divorce Among the Gulls: An Uncommon Look at Human Nature (Paperback)

~ (Author)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Biologist Jordan here observes medfly courtship, gorilla motherhood, sea gull nesting squabbles and other remarkable activities in the animal world. Wherever he looks, he finds parallels with human behavior, and he speculates that the human mind is actually an extension of the animal mind. Whether he writes of fruit bats emerging eerily from a eucalyptus grove at dusk, the magical universe of insects in a field of alfalfa or a rat on a power line silhouetted against the moon, Jordan's prose is scintillating, for he has a poet's ability to enchant and a naturalist's talent for opening our eyes to the wonders of the animal world. Above all, he succeeds in making us humble about human reasoning capacity, for it may not be as original or as beneficial as we like to think.
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Review

"There's a major new talent to welcome to the ranks of nature writers. And simultaneously to the small legion-the cohort, really, maybe just the platoon-of good science writers. Move over, Stephen Jay Gould. Make way, Barry Lopez and Sally Carrighar. Here comes William Jordan to join you." -- Noel Perrin, Chicago Sun-Times

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 205 pages
• Publisher: North Point Pr (February 1997)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0865475008
• ISBN-13: 978-0865475007
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 8.8 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #2,051,599 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #31 in

  Books > Health, Mind & Body > Psychology & Counseling > Movements > Comparative

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An Amazing Book!, August 14, 2001

By	Diane Pellegrini (Ellensburg, WA United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Divorce Among the Gulls: An Uncommon Look at Human Nature (Hardcover)

I loved it! The Divorce of Gulls was introduced to me by a coworker for the info on the Medfly that she found interesting! And I read that small portion to pacify her and I had to read the rest! Such wonderful insights on human behavior! Mr. Jordan has a wonderful sense of humor! I love the way he reflects on life. It's not a subject that I normally read about: bats, rats, roaches, science experimentation - oh my!

It was a great book and I am going to recommend it to anyone (and already have =>) who will listen!

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A charming, disarming view of man and similar species., December 10, 1998

By A Customer

William Jordan's book is a gentle reminder that we share this earth with other creatures that may not be so far from the tree of our own personal roots. He nudges and cajols us into considering our own animal behaviour by his extraordinary observations of other species and their all too familiar human manifestations. From ants and seagulls to cockroaches and coyotes, Mr. Jordan takes you on a journey that insures you never see other species the same way again.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Delightful, April 22, 1998

By	Peter G. Roode (Gainesville, Florida USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

A delightful book written by a naturalist, Wm Jordan, who uses observations in the animal world to contemplate people and their relationships. For example he notes that about 25% of gulls undergo divorce, by reason of biological incompatibility, and speculates that amongst the human animal that, too, might constitute justifiable grounds for divorce. Here are but two of the chapters: DRACULA STUMBLES INTO BED He is making observations on fruit bats that he saw in Australia. One had difficulty in reaching its perch, and hung precariously, awkwardly, till he finally re-positioned himself, and this reminded Jordan of the time as a teenager he'd climbed a large rock and gotten stuck half way up. After watching his desperate attempts to reposition himself he concludes that while he does not know what thoughts a bat might think, he feels how the bat feels. There is a kinship there despite the void across the species. PHYSIOLOGY LAB The last essay. He describes his college physiology lab. Twelve "virgin minds, that is to say empty and unformed." The task was to demonstrate a biochemical reaction that occurs in the liver. For that they need livers, and for that they have white rats, though Jordan calls them "liver cases". They have nicknamed their instructor OWL, and he shows them how to kill the rats. "The rats look up. We students look down. We have shared ancestry with these creatures,... until some 68 million years ago when our destinies split." He describes many experiments. They write up their final reports. They get their grades. They have discovered nothing new to science. But then that wasn't the purpose. The whole point of the class was merely to get good data, so that they will have good grades, so that they can get into medical school. They have just been repeating experiments done earlier by other scientists. The animals were "educational sacrifices". Then he ponders the mind-set this type of course inevitably induces in the students. That life of animals is expendable. But it is a dangerous notion. If it gets carried away, what is to stop a scientist from extending it to humans? The Nazi's did experiments on cold tolerance during WWII. They were vitally interested in the subject, since their soldiers were freezing to death on the Russian Front. Their experimental animals were humans in such places as Dachau. The Germans developed, as a result, the best treatment of frostbite and hypothermia, and we use it to this day. Of course we all abhor the Nazi's as the epitome of evil. We'd never do it? Oh really? Think of the Tuskeegee syphilis experiments. American scientists once cut holes in the cheeks of retarded kids, inserted glass tubes and performed shock experiments to see if Pavlov conditioning in humans works the same as it does in dogs. Or how about our marching of soldiers into the site of a newly exploded atomic bomb in the 50's as "training"? New York University scientists once injected hepatitis virus into retarded children in the 1970's. The CIA tested pathologic microbes on unsuspecting people of SF and NYC. There have been more than 50 such "experiments" documented in the USA this century. How do we explain this? The author suggests that the true demon isn't politics or nationality. It lives in the human mind and it is called, of all things, reason. "Homo sapiens is not a rational creature, he is a rationalizing one". We rationalize the things we do. And so there is danger in our college physiology classes, for it teaches a new generation how to rationalize. Perhaps all is well, but the courses ought to recognize they are handling a dangerous thing, and they ought also to teach the students this, so that they keep it in check. The author's last sentence in the book: "Say a small prayer for the souls of us all."