|
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A practical methodology based on three key ingredients, July 23, 1999
How different it is to be a reader in 1999 of Sense and Respond by Stephan Haeckel compared to what it was as one of the subjects in the eighties of which he writes. Then, no formal Sense and Respond model. Just "make-it-up-as-you-go" - euphemastically called "being flexible".Now at last, something more than rhetoric to rely on. For over two decades we have been promised competitive edge through technology investment, magic formulae for change management, super profits through continuous process improvement, market dominance through customer focus and a whole lot of other so-called "silver bullets". A whole generation of management by best-seller has meant that the more things change the more they stay the same. And why? Because they have all missed the truly unique elements of Steve Haeckel's formula. Governance principles and reasons for being have been around for generations. Leaders who do more than communicate and hope are well written-up. Organisation theory based on a systems approach is not new and modular organisation structures are not original. Neither is mass-customisation or the steering of a business based on manipulation of data managed as a corporate resource so that business transactions are reflected in decision support systems. Learning organisations based on adaptive loops are common, customer-driven process re-engineering case studies abound and project managers don't survive if they don't keep track of who-owes-what-to-whom. So what is unique about Steve Haeckel's brew? First, like Harold Geneen and his "grandma's soup" of the seventies, he's cooked slowly, tasted often and stirred in small amounts of lots of ingredients when the taste was not yet right. But most importantly he has based his brew on good stock. From the start he realised that you can't revive corpses. He has admitted that corporate transformation (the process that changes a caterpillar into a butterfly) and not reformation (work with what you've got) is what's needed to deal with the real world of change (continuous discontinuity). Second, he's produced a uniquely implementable version of an extraordinarily elegant commitment management protocol. He has thereby shown how to co-ordinate systematically the dynamics of 'who owes what to whom' in a way that enforces consistency with the governance principles and other policies of an enterprise. More importantly, he has demonstrated that the key to transforming a traditional business, so that it can thrive in an environment of continuous discontinuity, lies in equipping leaders to track the interactions of negotiated commitments to produce outcomes within the boundaries of the strategic intent of an enterprise. Not only has he dealt with the human factors of this critical equation, he has translated the sophisticated theory of commitment management protocols into robust practice and exploited hitherto ignored technology. The result is an order of magnitude more powerful than the business process re-engineering with which it is all to easily confused. Thirdly, he has successfully integrated a carefully selected inventory of proven components to produce a result in which the whole is considerably greater than the sum of the parts. The finished work displays a lustre that only comes from extensive rubbing against the real world. Key to this outcome has been Steve's understanding of the organic nature of the system that is an adaptive enterprise. For him, the system that deals with the problem of responding to the unpredictable is more than a mere academic abstraction. Each ingredient he has introduced has had to stand up before hundreds of discerning critics - his own customers to whom he has been accountable for an 'outcome'. Steve has understood that an adaptive enterprise is a dynamic interaction between real people, innovative technology, sophisticated intellectual concepts, practical leadership skills and sound information management methodologies. Neither one or all three of these unique elements of the Haeckel formula can magically make any old 'bus driver' a brilliant 'cabbie'. Nor, should they. This is not a book for the addicts of management by best seller. But any leader of a traditional corporation who can't 'sense' that Steve has got the problem right, who can't 'interpret' commitment management as a survival issue and who doesn't 'decide' to embark on an integrated journey of corporate transformation ought to 'act' in the interests of shareholders and make way for the present. The future is here and the early adopters of the Haeckel method of transformation will make change their ally and the unexpected their active business partner. As a former CIO of Westpac Banking Corporation and after 25 years in electronic banking I offer a word of advice. If you operate a traditional business in today's market place you will ignore this book at your peril.
|