Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Individualist Anarchists: Men Against the State., April 10, 2006
_Men Against the State: The Expositors of Individualist Anarchism in America, 1827-1908_ by individualist anarchist James J. Martin, republished by the libertarian press Ralph Myles, is a fascinating account of libertarian history in America. Perhaps the first individual to refer to himself as an anarchist, formerly merely a pejorative, was Proudhon, whose cry that "property is robbery!" began a revolution. Later in America others developed the philosophy of anarchism, eventually creating a schism between those who were opposed to property (the communist anarchists) and those who supported private property so long as it could be defined as the total product of an individual's labor (the individualist anarchists). Anarchism developed as a trend in direct opposition to the state and often maintained the need for a radical form of decentralization. However, most anarchists were not violent, advocating a peaceful slugging off of statism rather than violent revolution. This is contrary to the depiction of anarchists in popular literature and the media. In addition, while anarchists advocated the abolition of the state, they did not propose that anything new be set up as its replacement. This distinguishes true anarchists from others who may have opposed the status quo at the time but who in turn advocated a different form of government.
This book traces the development of individualist anarchism in America from the early experiments in mutualism of Josiah Warren, to the development of philosophical egoism particularly emphasizing early advocates of money and land reform, to the writings of Lysander Spooner and other abolitionist anarchists who later came to support secession, to the writings of Benjamin Tucker in his journal _Liberty_. The book begins by showing how Josiah Warren, an early adherent to the communal developments of the philanthropist Robert Owen, developed a system of mutualism and became one of the earliest individualist anarchists in the United States. Warren created a time store which used a system of labor backed money, as well as was involved in printing a newspaper _The Peaceful Revolutionist_. Warren advocated many reforms and was involved in the creation of the mutualist experiment, New Harmony. His ideas and writings came to influence later anarchists particularly Lysander Spooner and Benjamin Tucker. However, Warren ran into difficulties when he was accused of advocating free love, which he did not. It is interesting to note also the link between anarchists and the spiritualist movement at the time. There was also some link between anarchists and feminists and proponents of "free love" and birth control such as Victoria Woodhull, though many of the prominent anarchists disapproved of this link and went out of their way to disavow it. Eventually the various experiments in mutualism and communal living underwent a decline and became fragmented. In the development towards philosophical egoism, several individuals stand out as early precursors of the later anarchists. Among these are Ezra Heywood, a pamphleteer involved in the anti-slavery movement who advocated for labor reform, William B. Greene, a money reformer who opposed usury and banking, J. K. Ingalls, a land reformer who argued against rent on land, and Stephen Pearl Andrews, a social philosopher who became an opponent to slavery. Anarchism also had a particularly interesting history among the abolitionists, many of whom began by opposing slavery but who subsequently ended up opposing statism in total. Among these was the individualist anarchist and proponent of natural rights Lysander Spooner. Spooner was a New England lawyer who wrote on the unconstitutionality of slavery and the unlawful nature of taxation. However, later Spooner was to become appalled by the treatment of the South by the North and supported the idea of secession. Spooner also came to write various letters to lawmakers arguing that their rule was entirely arbitrary and that they were usurpers, tyrants, robbers, and murderers. Spooner also wrote on the trial by jury arguing that by interpreting the Magna Charta, originally juries and not judges would rule on the law itself and not merely on the guilt or innocence of the accused. Spooner also wrote that the Constitution of the United States was not binding on its citizens because few of them had been around when it was signed or had actually signed the document. Spooner's ideas came to influence a subsequent anarchist Benjamin Tucker, a former M.I.T. student who published the journal _Liberty_. Tucker abandoned Spooner's arguments for natural rights, however he proposed the notion of equality of liberty. Tucker was influenced particularly by Proudhon as well as by Herbert Spencer (though Spencer was not truly an anarchist) and Max Stirner. Tucker's journal _Liberty_ became a centerpiece of the anarchist movement and played some role in defending anarchists from accusations leveled against them during the Chicago bombings. In Tucker, individualist anarchism came to see its fruition. Eventually though Tucker was to leave the United States, and support the Allies in the First World War. With Tucker's death came the end of individualist anarchism for a time until it was revived among revisionists following the Second World War. This book ends with a bibliographical essay and two appendices, an original foreword to the book by Harry Elmer Barnes, and a genealogy of Josiah Warren showing that he was not a relative of revolutionary General Joseph Warren.
This book provides a fascinating account of the forerunners of modern libertarian thought. It shows us the history of individualist anarchism in America and its opposition to statism. In the modern era, where the state routinely cracks down on individuals who oppose it, the writings of anarchist thinkers perhaps need to be re-examined in the light of the horrors that have been perpetrated on the individual by the state. This book offers an excellent opportunity for such a re-examination of the ideas of early anarchists.
|
|
|
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Mutualism, Liberty, and Economics Without the State, January 29, 2006
James J. Martin's MEN AGAINST THE STATE is well worth reading. Martin gives a detailed account of men whose thinking could be considered anarshism-not anarchy. Martin not only reveals a forgotten historical tradition, his writing is an example of a clear writing style that clearly explains complex concepts.
James J. Martin presents such individuals such as Warren, Andrews, etc., whose political writings were a constructive attempt to improve economic organization which was attempt to improve both living conditions and enhance a free economic theory that would benefit men. The section on Time Stores and mutualism in communities are interesting. These were examples cooperatives that worked surprisingly well until illness decimated these cooperatives. One should note that these individualists, or anarchists if you will, were not violent maniacs attacking the state and attempting to overthrow the state. These men were presenting concepts to withdraw from a rigged economic system and present an effective alternative.
Martin's section on Lysander Spooner is instructive in understanding the United States Constituion. Spooner demonstrates that the Constitution was not an applicable document to succeeding generations who were not around to sign the document. In other words, Spooner argued the only contracts that men should honor were those which they actually signed. Another interesting view of Spooner's was that the Constituion was a document that enabled free men to act independently. If this were so, then why did the U.S.Government use considerable armed force to crush the Confederates whose only political crime was the desire to seceed and to be left along.
Martin's sections on Benjamine Tucker are examples of clear logic and good writing. Martin cites Tucker's essay on the four monopolies that inhibted the middle class and working poor from economic advance. These sections are worth the price of the book. Readers should carefully read Tucker's views of the four monopolies which are as timely now as they were in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
James J. Martin has written a classic with a reading style that should be comprehensible to anyone of "residual common sense." Martin presented a political tradition that could be called anarchism. However, the men and ideas mentioned in MEN AGAINST THE STATE are not the conventional view of violent bomb throwing misfits that are often associated with views on anarchists. When James J. Martin was alive, he mentioned to this writer that there was a market for MEN AGAINST THE STATE by those who taught in law schools. In an age of monopolistic capitalism and an ever increased police state, MEN AGAINST THE STATE is an intellectual antidote to these trends.
|
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
the American tradition of self-reliance, July 29, 2008
MEN AGAINST THE STATE (1953)
by James J Martin
includes original forward by Harry Elmer Barnes
This book contains the biographies of several men who advocated varyious types of societies without government. They are some of the ideological ancestors of various modern movements including anarcho-capitalism, individualist anarchism, libertarianism and mutualism. Anybody who sympathizes with any of these philosophies should read this book!
'MEN AGAINST THE STATE' has a special place in my own memory because it was the first place that I learned about Josiah Warren. Warren was an interesting guy who actually got to put his economic ideas into practice. He founded various little colonies including "Modern Times" on Long Island, NY and a second incarnation of "Utopia" in southwestern Ohio. Unlike many contemporary anarchists, Warren believed in private property. His ideas were compared with Pierre Proudhon, although he denied any connection. The first four chapters deal with his activities and his influence. In my opinion, the chapters on Josiah Warren are worth the price of the book.
The most famous men in this book are Lysander Spooner and Benjamin Tucker. Both are discussed at length as well as Ezra Heywood, William H Greene, J.K. Ingalls and Stephen Pearl Andrews. You will notice some similarities between many of these men. Several of them started as ministers, and several of them were abolitionists. Nevertheless, many opposed the Civil War on various grounds ranging from simple pacifism to opposition to state aggression to the constitutional right to secession. It is interesting to hear the internal debates over issues that are still relevant today, such as taxation, labor organizing and the role of a central bank. "Individualist Anarchism" was a truly decentralized movement and these men often disagreed. What united them was their observation that government would not instill equality among mankind.
This book will be enjoyed by anybody who has ever been skeptical about whether governments help us or hurt us. I would especially recommend this book to Americans who want to know what happened to the great anti-authoritarian tradition in the generations after the Founders.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
by Benjamin Ricketson Tucker
by Ron Paul
by Bill Kauffman
