From Publishers Weekly
Butler, no stranger to fraudulent health claims and quackery (he was founder and president of the Quackery Action Council) here presents a rogue's gallery of physicians, pseudo-scientists and self-appointed guardians of health, contending that they have taken Americans for the proverbial ride through rip-offs, health misinformation and just plain fraud. Although attacks on these people--who include Stuart Berger, M.D., Gary Null, Earl Mindell and Lendon Smith, M.D.--are hardly new, Butler's message of prevalent health fraud in alternative therapies does bear repeating. In addition to taking swipes at various alternative and New Age therapies, from homeopathy to crystal and faith healing and Christian Science, Butler bears down especially hard on chiropractors, calling them "masters of doubletalk and weasel wording." The media, he says--the Phil Donahues, Oprahs, Larry Kings and Geraldo Riveras--are also to blame for quackery. He hits on consumer magazines, names publishers who in the past have published books he believes are detrimental to health and chides Publishers Weekly book reviews for allegedly promoting suspect alternative therapies. Butler makes helpful suggestions about how to be a smart but skeptical health-care consumer, as well as about what other professionals (nurses, dentists, physicians, pharmacists, ethical chiropractors, librarians) can do.
Copyright 1992 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Butler, a nutritionist, attacks just about every alternative therapy in existence, including crystal healing, aromatherapy, and astrological counseling. Much of his data can be found in other works ( The Health Robbers , edited by Stephen Barrett and Gilda Knight, LJ 12/1/76), but he provides hard-to-find information refuting ultra-fringe therapies like firewalking and live cell analysis. Librarians may not appreciate his list of "book publishers to beware of," his suggestions that they place warning labels in books promoting unconventional therapies, or his allegation that many book reviews in Library Journal and Publishers Weekly "are done by non-experts who cannot tell the difference between a fact and a piece of nonsense." This is an extremely one-sided book mainly for libraries that collect heavily in alternative medicine. Others need more balanced viewpoints.
-Natalie Kupferberg, Montana State Univ. Lib., BozemanCopyright 1992 Reed Business Information, Inc.
See all Editorial Reviews