A Short History of the Printed Word (Paperback)

by Warren Chappell (Author), Robert Bringhurst (Author) "FOR NEARLY TEN CENTURIES, typographic printing has been a force of immense importance..." (more)
Key Phrases: printing types, foundry type, letterpress printing, Short History of the Printed, New York, World War (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
This classic volume should find its place on every design student's bookshelf. Here is the history of the printed word, from the earliest alphabets through the evolution of the printing press. The contributions of the great printers and typographers are here. A new chapter by Robert Bringhurst takes up this history where Chappell put down his pen, covering the most recent developments in the printed word. Over 200 illustrations appear throughout.

Product Details

• Paperback: 315 pages
• Publisher: Hartley and Marks Publishers; 2 Rev Upd edition (June 1, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0881791547
• ISBN-13: 978-0881791549
• Product Dimensions: 9 x 5.7 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #301,823 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #32 in	Books > Computers & Internet > Graphic Design > Desktop Publishing
  #79 in	Books > Computers & Internet > Graphic Design > Printing

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Chappell's "Short History" is Lively and Thorough, June 18, 2000

By	Peccator (Phoenix, AZ United States) - See all my reviews

A thoroughly enjoyable read on the people, places, and things that make up the history of type and publishing. Warren Chappell's book was revised and appended by noted author Robert Bringhurst and this book is the perfect complement to Bringhurst's own "Elements of Typographic Style". The content is alive with names, significant facts, technological contributions, and lots of good illustrations. This is an amazing book that is well-written and historically significant, and the authors fill in all of the gaps on the history of type and printing. The short history they describe is concise and thorough. The only disappointment is Bringhurst's final chapter on "The Digital Evolution and the Close of the Twentieth Century", where he completely overlooks the significant contributions of the people and technologies in the digital age and opts instead to explore the work of a few small private presses. Also, how can one brief summary chapter hope to describe the accomplishments of the last thirty years? Sadly, Bringhurst missed a real opportunity to provide a keen insight on the digital revolution and its impact on the printed word. All the same, this is a "must have" book for typographers, type designers, and typophiles.

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars a must read, June 19, 2003

By	Martin Lallier "lallierm" (Montreal, Qc Canada) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

The book is a great source of information. The 4 (not 5) stars is given cause the book is filled with postscript errors (missing letters, ligatures replaced by spaces, accented glyphs...). Disapointing for a book about typography.

9 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars What Historians Don't Know, July 14, 2000

By	Simulacrum - See all my reviews

Among graphic designers, one of the finest, most popular books in recent years is Robert Bringhurst's The Elements of Typographic Style (Hartley & Marks, 1992). In this book, Bringhurst revisits a classic history of typography, publication design and printing techniques that was originally produced in 1970 by Chappell (1904-1991), a book designer, illustrator and author who had studied with Rudolf Koch. Of eleven highly readable chapters, all were written by Chappell, with the exception of the last on "The Digital Revolution and the Close of the Twentieth Century." Why reissue Chappell's book? As Bringhurst explains in the preface, "He knew some of the things that historians know, but mostly he knew what historians don't know. I wanted the names and dates set straight, insofar as possible, and yet to hear the story told as Chappell told it, from a workbench rather than a keyboard, with silences in place of self-advertisements, and graver marks and acid stains in place of any footnotes." (Review copyright 2000 by Roy R. Behrens from Ballast Quarterly Review 15, No. 4, Summer.)