|
|
73 of 77 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the finest works ever penned, November 7, 2003
By A Customer
As a professor of English literature I have read thousands of books, short stories and histories. The Forty Days of Musa Dagh is one of the greatest pieces of literature ever written. It is certainly not as well known as The Great Gatsby or The Grapes of Wrath, and it usually only receives serious study at the university level, but this does not diminish its importance as one of the greatest works of fiction. It is stirring and disturbing, it relentlessly forces the reader to confront visions of the human psyche, of the darkness of evil, and of the power of courage. How anyone can draw a moral parallel between Werfel's The Forty days of Musa Dagh and Hitler's Mein Kampf (see Holdwater NYC, Sept. 20, 2003, below) is beyond comprehension or scholarship, and tells me that either they did not read the novel, or that they read the novel but did not understand it, or that they understood it but could not stare at it directly because what stared back at them was their own deformed reflection. What Holdwater is engaging in is called sophistry: he wrote twelve horribly written rambling paragraphs and articulated almost nothing. Having read several books on the Armenian Genocide - most recently The Burning Tigris by Peter Balakian - I notice also that Holdwater conveniently left out any mention of Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Viscount Bryce (Morgenthau being the American ambassador to Turkey during World War One, and Bryce being the British Ambassador to the U.S. until 1913) both very erudite deliberate statesmen who wrote extensively in their memoirs regarding the genocide of the Armenians and the dispositions of Taalat and Enver when confronted with the incomprehensible evil of the crimes they were committing. In addition he omits any mention of the efforts of the American Red Cross during world war one to relieve the suffering of the Armenians, and also fails to mention the hundreds of American, British and French missionaries in Eastern Anatolia during the years 1915 to 1922, many of whom wrote thousands of pages on what they observed. Is it not even possible Mr. Holdwater that there is just a little tiny bit, perhaps even a sliver - a shred even - of some evidence that at least a tiny genocide may have taken place - considering there is a mountain range of trustworthy evidence that seems to point in this direction? But this is the point of sophistry to get the ball bobbing and bouncing haphazardly back and forth, to inject illogical arguments into the matter that seem logical based on false assumptions, and in so doing reach ridiculous conclusions that distract from the truth. Another thing that strikes me in Mr. Holdwater's book review is his total lack of compassion and seeping hatred. He does not display even a sense of sadness let alone remorse towards the hundreds of thousands of Armenians who even the Turkish government admits died horrible deaths. The Turkish government's official position is that about 500,000 Armenians died as a result of what they term a "forced migration for their own safety." This is a great paradox: Holdwater claims to have read a book that is essentially about compassion, yet he himself displays none. Holdwater lastly recommends the reader not to place too much faith in Amazon's "yes" or "no" survey, my recommendation is, don't place too much trust in someone who has probably not read the book they claim to have read, someone who does not seem to possess even a little sympathy towards human suffering.
|