|
|
57 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Primer on Primates, May 27, 1998
By A Customer
At first glance a high tech stock investment guide that relies critically on you being able to tell the difference between gorillas, monkeys and chimps appears unlikely to be a serious money maker. Yet if you had followed the investment philosophy outlined in Geoffrey Moore's Gorilla Game at the beginning of this decade, you could have turned $10,000 into a couple of million dollars. The stock market has attracted no end of charlatans and snake oil salesmen with a plethora of advice on how to invest and grow rich, ranging from complex mathematical techniques such as chaos theory to fairly simple advice such as buy stocks in companies you know and like. In its simplest form, most of the advice boils down to "buy low, sell high." though it is usually couched in more cultured language such as "buy at the peak of a stock's dividend yield ratio, and sell at its trough." Geoffrey Moore and his co-authors, Johnson and Kippola, have no use for such language. In a straight-forward and entertaining book, they outline how some high tech companies grow exponentially to dominate the segments in which they participate, how they become gorillas. Generally, the authors provided a lay-man's explanation of what has recently come to be known in economics as the Theory of Increasing Returns. Some of the high tech companies that best epitomize this theory are Microsoft, Intel, Cisco Systems and IBM in its heyday. These companies were able to get their proprietary architectures accepted as the standard (sometimes completely by luck), and they were smart enough to exploit this initial standardization and the high switching costs it entailed to gain market share rapidly and dominate their industries. These companies are the ones Moore calls Gorillas. In addition to the Gorilla, who is the dominant leader in a segment, we also have the Chimp (the challenger) and the Monkey (the follower). The chimp had a shot at being a gorilla but didn't make it. Unable to get over this, he limps along muttering "I could have been a contender." The example Moore brings up of a chimp is IBMs OS/2 operating system. The monkey has no such hang-ups and essentially mimics the gorillas product. An example would be AMD with its Intel-like chips. As Moore, and his co-authors point out, a monkey lives or dies on execution. From an investment strategy perspective, the rules are simple. If the company is a gorilla, buy the stock. If the company is a chimp, stay away from its stock. If the company is a monkey, it is probably a good trading stock (buy at the lows, sell at the highs). Perhaps the best part of using the gorilla game as an investment strategy is that it is a low maintenance strategy, letting you make money without biting your fingernails on a daily basis. The hard part is finding new gorillas--in many sectors they may never develop.
|