Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
39 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Still recommended reading!, November 29, 1999
A great deal of research and archaeological findings have taken place since this classic was first published. Nevertheless, I recommend this comprehensive volume for its wealth of description of Celtic iconography and other evidence. Scholars may justifiably differ with some of Ross' conclusions, and her work is not popular with those who believe that the Celts did not have a culture distinct from their Indo-European neighbors. However, she remains a careful scholar who shares her evidence and insights in a fashion that even newbies will find interesting and highly readable. To learn about more recent findings, also take a look at the works of Barry Cunliffe.
|
|
|
17 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
For the more advanced Celtic scholar, November 8, 1999
By A Customer
Definately not for the beginner in Celtic studies, while the book is archaic in some of its terminology and scholarism, it still offers a fairly good resource for those wshing to learn more about the Ancient Celts.
|
|
|
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A recommended read for those studying pagans and Celts, September 12, 2007
Pagan Celtic Britain is an exhaustive study of the archaeological and mythic evidence of pagan Celtic practices specifically in Britain. Filled with maps, drawings and photographs, the author charts the locations of cult sites, especially springs and wells, and then covers certain themes in pagan worship such as the veneration of heads, and explores the prominent horned and warrior gods, the various goddesses, and the significance of animals such as the boar, horse, and especially birds. Ross concludes by examining these themes as evidenced in a particular region, northern Britain.
At times this is a bit of bore to read, as there are pages that can go by where you feel you are reading nothing more exciting than a museum catalog. The limited analysis at times seems hesitant, leaving me to wish that the author was less concerned about saying the wrong thing and offending academia, and instead had the courage to state bold opinions about possibilities of what some of these things mean. For instance, there is the recurring image of the ram headed serpent. It is minimally described as being a fertility symbol but this is never explained. For instance, is it because the horns are associated with the horned god who symbolizes fertility? Why do horns symbolize fertility in the first place? And why is this image combined with a serpent? I realize there are some things we can't know without getting into someone's head (obviously an impossibility) but at the same thing a lot can be inferred and more ideas can be presented, with the caveat that the theories are inferential and stated as such to give the reader food for thought.
Reading this I also realized how important it is to study the Gaulish material since it equates with the insular studies and specimens are much more numerous and analyzed. I am also further reminded of the fact that the Celts have over 300 named god/desses which we know of, most of which are named only once. This is apparent in this study with the huge amount of material which is catalogued. Also included are numerous gods and goddesses for which we have names but no epic. It is curious to contemplate these and wonder what their "stories" were.
However, speaking of ideas, I did like the theory that the Druids were perhaps attempting, in their last years, to codify and perhaps homogenize Celtic pagan ritual and belief. This allows for interesting speculation about what kind of networking they might have done, what institutions or systems they might have created. This impetus was stopped by the Romans, leaving you to wonder what might have happened otherwise. And, lastly, I was somewhat bothered by the author's slight contempt for the Druids. She rather looks down on the whole idea of Druids as philosophers, putting it off as classical author's romantic ideas towards the "noble savage", and in fact savage and barbarian are terms she uses for them. I thought this was a bit of the old imperialist and colonialist attitudes of the British, still vaguely coming through.
In the end though, I thought this was a very worthwhile read (despite the negatives I have written about here.) It provided depth and detail regarding the pagan Celts of Britain that would certainly be worthwhile for the student to read. A bit on the dry side, but with useful information and knowledge.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|