Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating "platonic" dialogue treating human progress..., June 23, 1998
Solovyov's "Three Conversations" is a fascinating inquiry in the form of a platonic dialogue examining the nature of war and human progress. The initial subject for examination is more or less as follows: given the nature of man, is war an inevitable (a necessary, or even good) factor of history, or will humanity progress beyond the need of war?Like a typical platonic dialogue, Solovyov too ends his work with a "mythos", an account of the Anti-Christ. The most intriguing part of the work, it is a story of the final conflict between Good and Evil. In some ways, it is the counterpoint to Dostoevsky's "The Grand Inquisitor". A rich, thought-provoking book that is also a delight to read, I highly recommend Solovyov's "War, Progress and the End of History".
|
|
|
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating "platonic" dialogue treating human progress..., March 31, 2002
Solovyov's "Three Conversations" is a fascinating inquiry in the form of a platonic dialogue examining the nature of war and human progress. The initial subject for examination is more or less as follows: given the nature of man, is war an inevitable (a necessary, or even good) factor of history, or will humanity progress beyond the need of war?Like a typical platonic dialogue, Solovyov too ends his work with a "mythos", an account of the Anti-Christ. The most intriguing part of the work, it is a story of the final conflict between Good and Evil. In some ways, it is the counterpoint to Dostoevsky's "The Grand Inquisitor". A rich, thought-provoking book that is also a delight to read, I highly recommend Solovyov's "War, Progress and the End of History".
|
|
|
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating "platonic" dialogue treating human progress..., December 17, 2001
Solovyov's "Three Conversations" is a fascinating inquiry in the form of a platonic dialogue examining the nature of war and human progress. The initial subject for examination is more or less as follows: given the nature of man, is war an inevitable (a necessary, or even good) factor of history, or will humanity progress beyond the need of war?Like a typical platonic dialogue, Solovyov too ends his work with a "mythos", an account of the Anti-Christ. The most intriguing part of the work, it is a story of the final conflict between Good and Evil. In some ways, it is the counterpoint to Dostoevsky's "The Grand Inquisitor". A rich, thought-provoking book that is also a delight to read, I highly recommend Solovyov's "War, Progress and the End of History".
|
|
|
|