City Baseball Magic--Plain Talk and Uncommon Sense about Cities and Baseball Parks (Paperback)

~ Philip Bess (Author) "The SABR Ballparks Committee, sponsors of both The Urban Baseball Park Design Project and this essay, is peopled largely by sober citizens who happen to..." (more)
Key Phrases: new urban ballpark, new stadium construction, urban ballparks, Armour Field, Comiskey Park, Wrigley Field (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Bess approaches baseball park design from the perspective of a committed urbanist and baseball fan. . . . He argues convincingly that the issues that surround stadium design are important to everyone, and are the same issues that confront cities as a whole: suburbanization, the dominance of the automobile, neglect of central cities and local neighborhoods, and architectural standardization." -- Kevin Fry, AIA Memo

"This brief and fascinatingly illustrated polemic urges other cities and baseball clubs planning stadiums to look at the alternative of the urban baseball park as a means to building better stadiums, promoting (mixed-use) economic development, and creating one-of-a-kind urban environments." -- Libby Howland, Urban Land

Product Description

City Baseball Magic is a polemic on behalf of the traditional urban baseball park, and an exercise in "pragmatic idealism." Todays new "retro" baseball stadiums look wonderful, but they are outrageously expensive and do not provide the intimacy nor foster the sense of community that was possible with the classic neighborhood ballparks (built in the early 1900's) because they are conceived as suburban buildings. They are a drain on taxpayers, they yield seating arrangements that are worse for the average fan in the upper deck, they result in huge ticket price increases, and they tend to destroy the physical and spatial fabric of cities. But most of these liabilities can be ameliorated by once again understanding the baseball park as an urban building subject to the physical constraints of urban networks of streets and blocks. To demonstrate this thesis, Bess offers the wonderfully conceived Armour Field plan, a proposal for neighborhood design and a new ballpark that was originally presented in the late 1980's as an alternative for the new stadium that the Chicago White Sox were determined to have built to replace the venerable old Comiskey Park on Chicago's south side. Still relevant today, the proposed ballpark addresses social, cultural, and economic issues, as well as issues of baseball and urban aesthetics; and demonstrates the superiority of the traditional urban baseball park over the modern stadium in ways both tangible and intangible. Includes 46 illustrations and photos.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 64 pages
• Publisher: Knothole Pr (September 8, 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0967398606
• ISBN-13: 978-0967398600
• Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 5.8 x 0.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #546,928 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars What the White Sox and Rangers should have read., April 27, 2001

By A Customer

This author is considered one of sport's architecture's most important proponents of the forgotten values that made parks such as Wrigley Field and County Stadium great places to watch baseball: designing ballparks where the common fan and not the suite-holder have first priority. His book examines why not all new ballparks are great parks, and identifies those factors that put Jacobs Field and PNC Park in a different league from The Ballpark in Arlington and Comiskey Park.